Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Street Registered 242rwkw R33 Skyline.
Looks stock underneath the bonnet!
Potential for 290-300rwkw E85.

Trent from Chequered says with E85 and Sard 850cc injectors, could crack 300rwkw or just under.
I have Sard 850cc E85 compatible injectors for $400 extra,
Trent quoted $650 for the tune.
$1100 on top, you have yourself a near 300rwkw R33 street registered.

Nissan Skyline R33 GTST
1996 model
198 000kms
Manual
$15000 spent on modifications:

Brand new multi layered steel head gaskets.
New VRS kit installed.
New thermostat
New timing kit (idler, tensioner, waterpump etc all changed)
Gates racing timing belt done.
ARP Head studs
Work done by Forced motorworx

Front mount intercooler (Return flow, no holes cut)
Apexi Power FC
HKS 2540 ball bearing turbo (in factory position)
Splitfire coilpacks
3" turboback exhaust
manual boost controller
GTR plumback blow off valve
Aftermarket aluminium Radiator with silicone radiator hoses
17" Volks SE37 Light weight wheels
Cusco Coilovers - height adjustable
HID Xenon driving light
s - 6000k kit
Apexi boost gauge
Short shift kit
blue dashboard led's
Alpine headunit
Jaycar front splits
New rear window tint.

242 RWKW - Tuned by Paul @ Chasers (Have email for proof)
half a years rego left

The BAD:
Rear RHS quarter panel has a scratch and a ding,, boot lid has a very slight bump which is hardly noticeable and needs to be readjusted), chipping paint on sideskirts.

Boot is locked shut, latch is caught. If you want a car with great street power then this is for you, under the bonnet the motor looks like standard. Standard airbox etc.

Been pulled in defect stations/epa checks and drove off with no extra paperwork smile emoticon
Sell with or without a RWC - to be negotiated
Genuine reason for sale

Tom
0431223124
Located in Narre Warren, VIC

$7900 SLIGHTLY NEGO

AFTER QUICK SALE HENCE THE PRICE! GOING OVERSEAS ON THE 8TH

post-93416-0-32072900-1434975818_thumb.jpg

post-93416-0-21179500-1434975824_thumb.jpg

post-93416-0-05609700-1434975831_thumb.jpg

post-93416-0-42677500-1434975836_thumb.jpg

post-93416-0-99799000-1434975858_thumb.jpg

Edited by Thomas Sabo
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...