Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a 1995 R33 GTR, which is fairly stock, except the usual exhaust and intake pod filters.

Here is my issue and this has me stumped. A year ago, I had started a thread here about seeing something called a VACS (Variable Airflow Control System) come pre-installed on my car when I bought her. The VACS is conneced to the ECU with 5 wires - two go the AFMs , one goes to ground, and the other two are soldered into the ECU circuitry, away from the pinouts. I knew that thing was useless, so people on here suggested I take it out. I disconnected that VACS from the ECU (just unplugged it), and the car starts to run crazy rich - 10.3-10.6 afr on idle.

Then I tried to use a stock R32 GTR ECU, with the O2 sensor ground connected so that it runs on the R33 GTR loom (as suggested by Nistune), and the car starts off, but idles extremely lean - around 17.3-17.8 afr. I am confused as to why it would be.

Asking for help from anyone who might have some ideas about the causes. The AFMs are stock and so are the injectors, at least from what I can tell. What throws me off is the inconsistency between the R32 and R33 ECUs, where one is causing extreme leanness, and the other is causing extreme richness. Shouldnt there be a semblance of similarity in the two, as they both run RB26DETT off of the same sensors, and shouldn't have opposing effect.

There are also these images that I want to share, of my R33 GTR ECU's internals, for anyone who might be able to tell me if the ECU is stock (in terms of the R580 chip) or it seems to have been modified with a chip or anything else. The first image shows the ECU itself with the chip, and the second one shows the wiring that goes from that stupid VACS into the ECU. I disconnected the VACS from the plug you see on top left corner of the second image and that is when the car runs extremely rich. With an R32 GTR ECU, the car runs extremely lean.

Any help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, all.

20150920_073837.jpg

20150920_074017.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...