Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Rexbomb dollar for dollar...great car and money well spent....

pre-2001 models only...forget the newer REX it's under powered and a heavy weight...even RWD cars can flog it. I had my 2000 STI from new and on my second GTR....had to pour a lot of money into the GTR to exceed the standard of the STI, but the STI is driven everywhere and anywhere.

Krawler it's nice to dream, but wake up!

Skylinegeoff "eat it in third" sorry the race is over and the rex was backing off...look at your speedo and may be his brake lights are glowing as you pass. It's not worth the risk after 160. If you can't be in front or catch and pass within 300 metres...give it up. (the track is a different matter)

Ferni 210rwkw with less traction and all that extra weight = not enough to win....but maybe in your mind, refer comment for Skylinegeoff.

Serious-Seven try making yourself understandable...woop ass!!!!

Now take it all with a sense of humour...as I will, when the replies and excuses/reasons for Losing/winning etc come in.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 13_devil

OMG! this is a 1st, i have never seen an un-man car destroy a wrx or any car for that matter  

dude get ur P's before u come in here and talk about ur soo called "fc" destroy other peoples cars, bit hard to do that hay if u cant drive  

i second that..... lol

GTR STI .....dude i in ore of your cars... u lucky and to have to fine ass bitches like that...is it r33 or r34 gtr? wouldn't a r34 (stock) just own all....

Sorry, just stating what i have seen/experienced.... even without launching in my car i have beaten wrx's (one in particular had lightweight racing wheels and exaust from what i could see)... my mates gtst with ~210rwkw, i can't beat unless i launch. Maybe the wrx's i have come up against just have bad drivers.

LOL...... you dont believe it ?

Pfffft.. i dont care.. there is already people who have seen what i have from these forums in real life.

you two kids are just keyboard warriors.

Ok then... Christmas present from Santa? Then why did you change your thing to 'Sleeper :P'

Yeah, I learned how to use a keyboard once

And how am I a kid, your 15

I'm not even going to bother replying to any of your stupid comments on how i got my car.

I have so much to say about you but what for ? where behind keyboards and argueing... what a waste of time.

anyway, WRX's are pretty hard to beat off the lights with the usual GTS25-t you find on the street.

But since they have such short gear ratio's that launch doesnt last to long.

once you hit over 100km/h you see your car rocketing past the WRX.

anyway, WRX's are pretty hard to beat off the lights with the usual GTS25-t you find on the street.

But since they have such short gear ratio's that launch doesnt last to long.

once you hit over 100km/h you see your car rocketing past the WRX.

Are you tripping on something?, RB25 eats EJ20's... well atleast from what i have seen.

Are you tripping on something?, RB25 eats EJ20's... well atleast from what i have seen.

Sorry kid, but i think you didnt get what i was saying ? Offcourse a WRX could do a better 0-100 then a GTS25-t. But anyone in this particular forum would choose a R33 over a 99WRX ;)... i said the r33 is better.

GO THE RB25DET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sorry kid, but i think you didnt get what i was saying ? Offcourse a WRX could do a better 0-100 then a GTS25-t. But anyone in this particular forum would choose a R33 over a 99WRX ;)... i said the r33 is better.

GO THE RB25DET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Look KID, no you didnt say the R33 is better, im gonna have to shove a sign up ur ass Quoteing 'WRX's are pretty hard to beat off the lights'

I have so much to say about you but what for ?

Yeah dont worry, I know a few people on here that have much to say, to you to.

I recon I could beat a wrx to 100 pretty much every time, when my car was stock and I couldn't drive it as well as I can now it only took till about 110k's, recon I could have one easily by 80 now if I dont get it off the line anywayz!

Sorry kid, but i think you didnt get what i was saying ? Offcourse a WRX could do a better 0-100 then a GTS25-t. But anyone in this particular forum would choose a R33 over a 99WRX ;)... i said the r33 is better.

GO THE RB25DET!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Ding Ding Ding There goes the school bell again... Lunch time now. "Guess what guys... I got a new matchbox car today"

Rexbomb dollar for dollar...great car and money well spent....

pre-2001 models only...forget the newer REX it's under powered and a heavy weight...even RWD cars can flog it. I had my 2000 STI from new and on my second GTR....had to pour a lot of money into the GTR to exceed the standard of the STI, but the STI is driven everywhere and anywhere.

Krawler it's nice to dream, but wake up!

Skylinegeoff "eat it in third" sorry the race is over and the rex was backing off...look at your speedo and may be his brake lights are glowing as you pass. It's not worth the risk after 160. If you can't be in front or catch and pass within 300 metres...give it up. (the track is a different matter)

Ferni 210rwkw with less traction and all that extra weight = not enough to win....but maybe in your mind, refer comment for Skylinegeoff.

Serious-Seven try making yourself understandable...woop ass!!!!

Now take it all with a sense of humour...as I will, when the replies and excuses/reasons for Losing/winning etc come in.

Agreed... Take it from sum1 who's been there n done that. :throwup:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
×
×
  • Create New...