Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys. Been scouting these forms for months since I got my car last year. I'm in Alberta Canada but this seems to be the best forum for info. 

 

Anyhow, I have a. 1989 r32 gtst with the rb20det, fmic, rb25 turbo, walbro 255, blitz intake and bov delete. It will not idle when warm. The car will stall coming to red lights after the rpm drop almost everytime. I have a brand new tps sensor in the car and I still get code 43 (tps code). So I'm wondering is this my issue? Does anyone have any idea what the voltage is supposed to be going into the tps? I have 5v at the 3 wire plug and 12v at the tps sensor it self. I set the tps to. 0.48 where it should be and still nothing. I watched the voltage go up smoothly with the throttle all the way to wot (car off, ignition on) it reads 4.08v. 

 

My iicv will not help adjusting my idle either.. 

 

Also while I'm revving the car. I'll hold and maintain idle at 3k or 4k whatever I tried it at it sounds like a misfire Is also happening. I have brand new plugs in the car so I'm certain it's not that. It boosted fine last summer with no hesitation or missing, (haven't been able to drive it since because of winter here). 

 

What do you all think it is? Clearly an issue at the tps or something. 

 

Thank you all for the help on this, I hope to have this solved rather quick. I do plan to swap some Toyota echo coil packs in very shortly too, if anyone has some info on wiring that would be appreciated too! 

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/476326-help-rb20det-tps-issue-wont-idle/
Share on other sites

RB20s do not use the analog output from the TPS for the ECU.  They really only use the closed position switch for the idle position.  The potentiometer on them is for the TCU.  The idle switch should be set so that it changes state just as you start moving the throttle away from closed.  If you bend over the idling engine and you manually move the throttle bellcrank, at the very very first movement of it, the ECU should double pulse the injectors.  If you hear that at that point in the rotation, it is set correctly.  The trick is to set it too high, so you can tell that it is doing it, then adjust it down from there.

You MUST have the IACV working, otherwise it will stall coming to a halt.  Take it off, dismantle it and clean it with solvent.

28 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

RB20s do not use the analog output from the TPS for the ECU.  They really only use the closed position switch for the idle position.  The potentiometer on them is for the TCU.  The idle switch should be set so that it changes state just as you start moving the throttle away from closed.  If you bend over the idling engine and you manually move the throttle bellcrank, at the very very first movement of it, the ECU should double pulse the injectors.  If you hear that at that point in the rotation, it is set correctly.  The trick is to set it too high, so you can tell that it is doing it, then adjust it down from there.

You MUST have the IACV working, otherwise it will stall coming to a halt.  Take it off, dismantle it and clean it with solvent.

OK so you don't feel like this is a wiring issue? I mean the tps is brand new and as far as I know setting it to 0.48 is all it should need to be done. I did clean my iacv but it won't adjust idle. I'll screw it either way and doesn't affect anything. I unplugged the tps while I did it. 

1 hour ago, Kraaken.r32 said:

and as far as I know setting it to 0.48 is all it should need to be done

No, you didn't listen to what I said.  RB20s are not RB25s.  The RB25 uses the analog output of its TPS (That's the potentiometer) for setting the idle point.  And the correct voltage setting for that is ~0.45v.  The RB20 DOES NOT use the potentiometer of the TPS for any function.  The pot is only for the transmission computer.  The RB20 uses the TPS's switch.  A digital switch.  On, off.  There is no 0.45 volts associated with that.  It is a simple click decision.  If you look closely at the TPS you will note that there are two connectors.  One for the ECU and one for the TCU.  In a manual car, the TCU one is not even really connected to anything.

As to whether there is a wiring problem with your IACV....there could be, but that is impossible to internet diagnose.  Dirty/seized up is always far more likely than a wiring problem unless someone clumsy has been buggering around with it.

Have you reset the ecu since putting in the new sensor?
To make sure its not the old code.

What happened to the old one, did it just die?

As gts boy said it might not be switching correctly.

How long has it been doing it?
Throttle body could possibly need a clean.

What got changed before it started this behaviour?

6 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

No, you didn't listen to what I said.  RB20s are not RB25s.  The RB25 uses the analog output of its TPS (That's the potentiometer) for setting the idle point.  And the correct voltage setting for that is ~0.45v.  The RB20 DOES NOT use the potentiometer of the TPS for any function.  The pot is only for the transmission computer.  The RB20 uses the TPS's switch.  A digital switch.  On, off.  There is no 0.45 volts associated with that.  It is a simple click decision.  If you look closely at the TPS you will note that there are two connectors.  One for the ECU and one for the TCU.  In a manual car, the TCU one is not even really connected to anything.

As to whether there is a wiring problem with your IACV....there could be, but that is impossible to internet diagnose.  Dirty/seized up is always far more likely than a wiring problem unless someone clumsy has been buggering around with it.

OK sorry didn't understand. Now I got it. So what you are saying is I should be able to adjust it forward till it idles ok then test? 

2 hours ago, Slap said:

Have you reset the ecu since putting in the new sensor?
To make sure its not the old code.

What happened to the old one, did it just die?

As gts boy said it might not be switching correctly.

How long has it been doing it?
Throttle body could possibly need a clean.

What got changed before it started this behaviour?

I believe it is an old code but I don't know how to reset the ecu. I removed my neg battery cable and let it sit for a minute but didn't help. It has been doing this since I owned my car. About a year. One thing I haven't done is clean the throttle body. Maybe that's next 

I believe it is an old code but I don't know how to reset the ecu. I removed my neg battery cable and let it sit for a minute but didn't help. It has been doing this since I owned my car. About a year. One thing I haven't done is clean the throttle body. Maybe that's next 
You can look it up specific or just wait for my buddy here to correct me.

Negative terminal off - Ignition on - press and hold brake for aprox 3-5 mins. Done.
Turn off key - put terminal on.

The ecu retains some power so by pressing the brake it tries to light the signals and drains the ecu.
1 minute ago, Slap said:

You can look it up specific or just wait for my buddy here to correct me.

Negative terminal off - Ignition on - press and hold brake for aprox 3-5 mins. Done.
Turn off key - put terminal on.

The ecu retains some power so by pressing the brake it tries to light the signals and drains the ecu.

Sounds simple. I'll give it a shot and then pull the codes after work today. Thank you! 

  • Like 1
13 hours ago, Slap said:

You can look it up specific or just wait for my buddy here to correct me.

Negative terminal off - Ignition on - press and hold brake for aprox 3-5 mins. Done.
Turn off key - put terminal on.

The ecu retains some power so by pressing the brake it tries to light the signals and drains the ecu.

Sounds simple. I'll give it a shot and then pull the codes after work today. Thank you! 

So did some diagnosing. Everything is checking out perfect. We had a scan tool to monitor everything and the tps is working, iacv working, the only thing I'm unsure of is the O2 sensor. Also I'm going to coil pack convert the car this weekend so that should solve any misfire I have I believe. But the idle hunt is still there. Now I got it to the point it will idle very well, but when I rev it a couple times the car will then drop the idle to 500 or less and struggle to stay alive. 

[emoji849][emoji51][emoji3166][emoji856]

 

I have had to much negative feed back when i assist with things like this not that all the feed back is bad

. Hopefully someone will chime in b4 the temptation to hypothesis becomes to much!

 

 

Ahh i remember this... and i quote gts boy here as a flash back.

 

"Gents,

When Slap is asking about closed loop, he's talking about closed loop fuelling.  I suspect when Johnny Dose is talking about closed loop (in above posts) he's talking about closed loop idle speed control.  So, talking at cross purposes.

As has been posted before;

At idle (ie, TPS closed, ~0.45v) the ECU is definitely in closed loop idle speed control.

At idle, provided the O2 sensor is warm enough, the ECU will be in closed loop mixture control.  But this often fails and the ECU will just revert to the idle fuelling map.

At idle, the ECU does not change timing based on O2 feedback.

At idle, the ECU adds AND subtracts timing from the base 15° according to its needs for idle speed control, but is aiming to run 15° and control speed with IACV wherever possible.".

 

 

18 hours ago, Slap said:

emoji849.pngemoji51.pngemoji3166.pngemoji856.png

 

I have had to much negative feed back when i assist with things like this not that all the feed back is bad

. Hopefully someone will chime in b4 the temptation to hypothesis becomes to much!

 

 

Ahh i remember this... and i quote gts boy here as a flash back.

 

"Gents,

When Slap is asking about closed loop, he's talking about closed loop fuelling.  I suspect when Johnny Dose is talking about closed loop (in above posts) he's talking about closed loop idle speed control.  So, talking at cross purposes.

As has been posted before;

At idle (ie, TPS closed, ~0.45v) the ECU is definitely in closed loop idle speed control.

At idle, provided the O2 sensor is warm enough, the ECU will be in closed loop mixture control.  But this often fails and the ECU will just revert to the idle fuelling map.

At idle, the ECU does not change timing based on O2 feedback.

At idle, the ECU adds AND subtracts timing from the base 15° according to its needs for idle speed control, but is aiming to run 15° and control speed with IACV wherever possible.".

 

 

15 degrees is the proper timing for the rb20? I heard was 20 degrees? I'm going to retime the car this weekend as well after my coil pack conversion is done. So basically the O2 sensor would have no bearing effect on the idle of my car? I'm horrible when it comes to electrical.. So excuse me if I'm understanding things wrong here. 

 

Thank you for the help

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have been being VERY quiet about what you're alluding to, as it is something that ticks me off... The number of cars from factory that run coil overs is HUGE! Most of them these days do... The other part that annoys me, is people saying "Well all the incabin adjustable suspension is illegal by blah blah blah"... If that's the case, then why can I buy a car brand new that can do it if, FULL STOP in cabin adjustable suspension is illegal...   Also, I could just chuck some aftermarket shocks in my car, throw the stock springs on, after my blue slip, dump my super low springs back in. Same shock and spring style setup... Hell, they could also be the same colour springs etc.     I'm voting, BlueSlipper didn't want to touch the above car for some reason. Whether it be some sort of bias against the car, the owner, them maybe having previously done dodgy shit and now they're being super careful in case they get slapped in the face by the Gumbyment again... Find a new blueslip place.   And can confirm as you had said, yes there are holy bibles of vehicle heights, and all sorts of other suspension stuff. Heck your run of the mill mechanic, and tyre shop has access to all of that stuff. It's how they do wheel alignments...
    • Funny story Heading to Sydney this morning on the HWY there was some slow traffic, so I gave it the beans and midway through my overtaking "power run" I lost all power It seems that I missed a hose clamp,  and the MAF and filter went WiFi To make this more problematic, the little tool kit that lives in the boot, is sitting in the sun room at Goulburn......LOL Luckily for me I found a bit of steel on the side of the road that could be used like a rusty and bent flat head screw driver to tighten it up enough that it got me into Sydney, it is now all tight like a tiger with the aid of a 8mm socket Note to self: Use my brain and double check stuff, and always keep that little tool kit in the car for when I have a brain fart
    • Oh, and as for everyone with their fuel economy changes, I switch between E10 and 98 in the company car. Even do when I had personal cars that could run on E10. You know what changed my fuel economy in any noticeable way? How I drove, and where I drove. Otherwise, say on full tanks of just back and forth from work only (So same trips, same sort of traffic), couldn't notice a difference that I can correlate to the type of fuel in use. In the current vehicle, that's over 42L of USABLE fuel. While 98 is all "more energy dense", it also has higher knock resistance as it takes more energy to get it to ignite too. The longer hydrocarbons, typically more tightly bound. So running the same ignition map, can also produce less power, if there isn't enough time to get it all burnt through properly, as yep, the flame propagation speed is different from lower octane fuel to higher (Higher has a lower flame propagation, due to the more tightly bound and harder to self ignite funs. This is also typically where, a vehicle that is designed purely to run on 91 (Whether it be E10 or normal 91) usually sees absolutely no real world difference in fuel economy for the normal man, woman, or dog.
    • We've got some servos around me that have 91 with E10, 91 (no E10), 95, and 98. At those stations the change from 91 E10 to 91, is typically around 8c/L.   But lets not get started on the price of fuel in Oz. It's ridiculous. All the service stations around me, bar one, the price of fuel has been over the $2 mark per litre for the cheapest, 98 being around $2.45. That one service station is a CostCo, fuel from it comes from the same refineries, and makes no pitstops, it runs great, including the 98. In fact, I've had no issues on CostCo fuel, but plenty of issues at other stations!. The CostCo fuel, was $1.65 roughly this week for 94 with E10. $1.88 for 98. Servos directly across from it, $2.10 for 91 E10, and $2.48 for 98. The part I had to laugh at? If I drive multiple HOURS away from Brisbane, say out near Nanango, or Kingaroy, or even out to Goondiwindi, the price of their fuel, is the same as what it is at the CostCo... Oh, and that BP servo at Goondiwindi is HUGE and goes through epic turnover of fuel, so it's not sitting there for weeks going to shit. And what blows me away, my mate is one of the people who drives the Fuel Tanker all around QLD, delivering to all those places. At the same company his previous role was doing the "local haul" deliveries... Same truck, same driver, same pickup point it all comes from. So you tell me, how the hell it is 60c/L CHEAPER for fuel, when nearly all else is equal, except they require a B-Double to drive half a day out of Brisbane, and half a day back, every second day, compared to the delivery that can be under 30 minutes drive from the fuel pickup point... Not to mention, go five blocks down the road, and Ampol to Ampol will vary 30c/L... And I've had this conversation with my mate... The way it's priced, is just typical, pure and utter rubbish... He also does runs from Brisbane, to all over QLD, down to Newcastle, Sydney, Nowra, Melbourne, Geelong, and even out to parts of the NT depending on the companies needs. His main stuff is all the longer distance away from home for a few days at a time, then when he's back, he loves to just pickup extra shifts wherever he can in whichever truck, hence all the weird different places.   Oh, as for getting E10 into all the fuels in Australia... It was very quickly highlighted, that we don't have enough biomass available to use to make E10 sustainably like they require, and it would dramatically cut into our, and the worlds food chain supply...   I vote we all just start running on liquid methane gas... Plenty of that just getting tapped off at tips from underground decay... (Note, this is pure just stupid commenting. I could very easily highlight the reasons its not a good idea especially on scale...)
    • Am I correct in assuming that the R35's are getting the classic skyline haircut off the odometer?  Quick search on carsales, there are 33 08 and 09 GTR's for sale, only 2 of them have more then 100,000km's on them (116,075 and 110,000 respectively).  And somehow there are about 25 for sale with around 60,000kms? Looks like the classic skyline haircut to me =/
×
×
  • Create New...