Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

:headspin: 1994 GTST Skyline

HKS T51R SPL turbo

Custom Tubular stainless manifold

HKS Wastegate

Apexi AVCR Boost Controller

Microtech LT12s

Large FMI

Bilstein Suspension

HKS Springs

3.5in mandrel exhaust

17" Alloy Wheels

New Tyres

Custom Plenum

650cc Injectors

600hp Clutch (new) and lightened billet flywheel

Bosch 044 fuel pump and surge tank

Alpine stereo (amps, speakers, subs etc)

Forged oversized Pistons

Forged RB26 I-Beam rods

Tomei 1.8mm metal head gasket

Replaced all gaskets

Machined Crank

New bottom end and conrod bearings

plus more! Reason for sale - just finished putting the engine back together (forgie's etc) and found that it has cost too much money

Price starts at about $50,000, as that has been what I have spent, but realistically according to the market at the moment , asking around the $29,000 mark is quite reasonable

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/49717-r33-gtst-large-hks-t51r/
Share on other sites

Interior has been completely colour coded metalic silver and the boost gauge and AVCR controller is on the dash. I f anyone wants pics, i don't have any until after the weekend as the head as to be retensioned for running in procedures, so after the weekend i'll have some pics for whoever wants them.

Update on power as was dyno tuned on the weekend

231rwkw at 15psi on pump fuel and still on base timing. When we increased the timing by 1 degree, the power jumped up by 8kw at the rear. Now modifying the intercooler pipe (inlet side) due to a possible restriction and going up to 20-25psi on Saturday, then tinkering with the timing for ultimate power.

Will be at this years Jamboree, it's white in colour and a HKS sticker on the rear quarter windows, so if any one is interested, please feel free to approach me and ask some questions...... i won't bite!

Reason for sale - just finished putting the engine back together (forgie's etc) and found that it has cost too much money and due to new family additions, something has to go (baby seat in this skyline is not a good idea)

Dude Sell the baby on eBay. This beast soudns way too sweet

Ok, cool

New baby and seat for sale, 7months old, doesn't scream or dirty nappies, user friendly, 6" chrome momo's on stroller with 100shot NOS for up hill dashes to the change room and one owner since new!

At least we all still have a sense of humour amoungst us all!

OK update agian 23psi = 305rwkw, need to send away the microtech to have a 3 bar map sensor upgrade to get more boost, we need 30psi+ to get what I want!!!!!!!! Couldn't go above 23psi due to cheap crap hose clamps boosting off!

And yes it is running down the strip at Jamboree!

before rebuild 13.27 on 7psi, about 180kw! standard cams!

I will have to get the print out and scan it to send you the dyno graph, i will have it at Jamboree if you will be there.

For engine bay pics post your e-mail so I can send them to you.

OK update agian 23psi = 305rwkw, need to send away the microtech to have a 3 bar map sensor upgrade to get more boost, we need 30psi+ to get what I want!!!!!!!! Couldn't go above 23psi due to cheap crap hose clamps boosting off!

And yes it is running down the strip at Jamboree!

That seem rather weak considering how amount of air a t51 must be moving at 23psi. There has to be a restriction somewhere else in ur system causing the low power figures.

What compression is it running now with the 1.8mm head gasket??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...