Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi,

There are alot of r33's out there, getting imported with about 100K on the clock. So that's a major service point with the timing belt. My question is, how long do these engines last before having to get rebuilt?

Will they last another 100K before another timing belt is needed and at what km would the engine need to be rebuilt?

Thanks,

Dizzo

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/51283-r33-engine-life-expectancy-rb25det/
Share on other sites

There's no definate km's where it must be rebuilt for any engine

it's all about how you treat it. Start her up eveyr morning and take it to the redline in every gear while it's cold, dont service it, drive it to it's limits all the time and dont expect it to last too long

Take it easy, treat it well, service regulary and you shouldnt have a problem for a fair while.

there was a guy in NT (I think), who had his R31 station wagon do more than 1,000,000 km without a rebuild. I think a mate of mine still has the newspaper clipping...

Yeah, you are kinda asking "How long is a piece of string?", but I gather you want to know how long you can go without a rebuild if properly looked after... I don't see why you cant get more than 300,000 km (assuming the previous owner looked after it too). But I expect the turbo to let go before that...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...