Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So the smaller throat diam of the GTR AFMs makes no difference.

Another thing a friend did, that i also see on Jap cars is remove the hot wire sensor from wahtever AFM you are using and simply drill a hole in your inlet pipes to suit. Some good resin to seal it, onto the pipe, and away you go.  

If i go twin with RB26 head thats all i was going to do with the Z32 or Q45 AFM with the std RB20 Pfc.   But i was going to try and put the full AFM in the pipe from the intercooler to Inlet plenum, figured the AFM may even read more accurate as it is sensing the cooler air post intercooler...would have to extend the wiring though...ppls thoughts?

If you relocate the AFM hot wire sensor into a larger diameter pipe then it will show lower air speed (therefore lower voltage) for the same volume of air ingested. It isn't quite linear, but simplistically, if you take an RB20 AFM hot wire sensor and stick it in a 90 mm housing it will show around 4.0 volts at the same airflow that it showed 5.1 volts in the original 80 mm housing. The problem is at idle it will show 1.0 volts instead of 1.3 volts, and that may be too low for the ECU to use.

That is the main reason why the Z32 AFM upgrade is popular, they show almost exactly the same voltage at idle, the advantage is they tapper off as the airflow increases. As I said not a linear change.

I have seen a couple of cars with airflow meters in the pipework from the intercooler to the plenum. Most usually the 90mm Q45 AFM's. The problem with doing it seems to be mechanical as they are plastic and the inlet flange (where the airfliter box usually bolts on) is not very strong. They also seemed to have additional retaining methods (epoxy and bolts) holding the hot wire sensor in place. Obviously being under boost, you can't afford to have any leaks.

This is also quit effective if you locate the BOV before the AFM, that way you don't get the sudden spike of richness when the BOV vents.

Have I opened Pandora's box enough?:rofl:

you can buy z32 afms from REPCO and the like, cheap there a std bosch part and the plug is also std bosch part I would think you could get them around $380-390 ea(with plug)NEW, as i got two cheaper but only cos i know the guy.

the rb20/25 afm is an excellent upgrade an better than the z32 up to around 530rwhp

,its only if you are going to go more than 530rwhp would i suggest buying z32

(keep in mind i'm talking for a GTR)

yes larger scale (std afms~400rwhp to rb20/25 540rwhp)

and larger size 80mm(std 65mm) less restriction then std afms

(same physical size as z32)

same plug as std so will plug straight in but you will need to change pfc setting and you should aways check on dyno for safe air/fuel ratios as it uses slightly different load points from the mapping

ps i de-screened mine as well to flow better

hope that helps

pete

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...