Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey All..

Im looking at getting the iridium plugs (pre-gapped at .8mm), but it seems after searching that people use different heat ratings..

What is the recommended range for a car that would be pushing about 200RWKW in the future ??

I would think the BKR6EIX would be the go - however, if anyone thinks the BKR7EIX i would like to hear...

:P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/54967-spark-plug-heat-range-6-or-7/
Share on other sites

yes, definately use the 7 as you will be pushing higher combustion temperatures so this plug is better designed for that....also I have more horsepower than this and the 7's are great....don't go 8 or 9 though, very bad.

I think 6's are too cold for 12 psi, 7 would do... I run 14 psi with sevens all day long and they work fine. I would only go 6's if you are having knock problems. Sometimes if your plugs are the wrong heat range or too hot like 8's or 9's they can act like glow plugs and cause you mixtures to detonate early in the cylinder causing knock.

my 2 cents, correct me if i am wrong :(

I think 6's are too cold for 12 psi, 7 would do... I run 14 psi with sevens all day long and they work fine. I would only go 6's if you are having knock problems. Sometimes if your plugs are the wrong heat range or too hot like 8's or 9's they can act like glow plugs and cause you mixtures to detonate early in the cylinder causing knock.  

 

my 2 cents, correct me if i am wrong :(

Actually 6's are a hotter plug, 7 are a colder. you had it the wrong way round :-)

I got sixes then mate/tuner said take them back and get sevens - it won't hurt.

I've had no probs running sevens with stock boost even on cold mornings and there's room for improvement next time we tune and up the boost.

allrighty then - looks like im hearing a bit of support for the 7's..

Well ill actually do a correction - i am runing stock boost levels, but with the full exhaust and intercooler its actually running about 8psi at WOT (acording to boost gauge)..

But - thanks for the replies guys - 7's it is.

allrighty then - looks like im hearing a bit of support for the 7's..

Well ill actually do a correction - i am runing stock boost levels, but with the full exhaust and intercooler its actually running about 8psi at WOT (acording to boost gauge)..

But - thanks for the replies guys - 7's it is.

I'm running 6's in my car at the moment, with around 15psi, but the plugs have been re-gapped to around .7 - .8, and haven't had any problems, the only reason I would go 7's is if I’m getting detonation or pre-ignition, where the plugs is re-taining the heat and as soon as fuel is pumped into the cylinder it ignites, at the wrong time... But with stock boost you won't have anything to worry about.

So most people go 7's if thier running more then stock boost, and usualy for a saftey thing.

Yep - i just heard back from Repco..

BKR7EIX - not available, according to ngk - they only make them in BRK7EIX-11, which are gapped to 1.1m...and ngk dont recommend re-gapping iridiums...

BKR6EIX - available, $24 each.....

So - for the iridiums pre-gapped to .8m, i think i have to go 6's....

Yea i know about the copper - main reason i wanted to go the iridiums is because i can change them way less frquently..

My intercooler piping crosses the block, so i have to disconnect it everytime i change the plugs...

So to go iridiums, it will save me time and $$ in labour...they last about 100k....

Looks like ill be going the BKR6EIX's...

I use NGK BKR7E (V-Power 'grooved' plugs) gapped at 0.9mm. Nope, no misfires, even at 17psi. These plugs are the best ive used (considering the platinums misfied like all hell at 0.9mm) and best of all, they're cheap! Stuff like octane booster fouls plugs easily, so if they are a bit shagged, toss em out and throw in a new set every 10,000ks...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Consider a 35 too...
    • He's right ~ there is no 'magic' with stuff like this ... it is more likely that in the process of looking for the short, the loom/wire 'incidentally' got moved in the process, thus removing the short ~ now, that maybe a wire (in a loom) rubbing against the edge of some grounded metal, that's worn through the insulation, causing the (now intermittent) short to ground. If one wire in a loom has been damaged in this fashion, it's reasonable to presume that other wires beside it may have also be damaged, and now exposed...you can bet the green crusty copper corrosion will start... ...that'd be a pisser, Murphy's Law steps right in as GTS observes...but worse, something like that is easier to find when shorted...ie; unplug bulb and fuse, and put multimeter in continuity mode so you get constant beep, and carefully poke about hoping to find if some movemet of the harness stop the beeping.... ...it's still all a bit Arnie tho' ..It'll be back... 😃
    • Yeah, but knowledge of one wire's insulation worn through to short on earth implies the possibility of other wires doing the same. I had my power steering die, because the wire that runs to the solenoid valve on the rack runs in the same loom as the power wire for the O2 sensor. And when the O2 sensor/wire did something stupid and burnt part of that loom to death, the only indication was the shit(ter) fuel economy and the heavy steering. It took deep excavation of the looms in the bay to find the problem. Not wear through in that case, but similar shit.
    • Ah, I thought he'd wired it to one of the spare ECU inputs! Too long ago since I read that post, ha ha. I've been arguing with radiators, harmonic balancers, alternators and rust since reading it.
    • Correct. The ECU cannot read oil temp. (Well, I think it probably can in some situations. I did have the thought of potentially repinning the ECU when I was doing oil pressure). I am using this into the MPVI dongle, so that the MPVI dongle can read oil temperature. It is attached to a VDO gauge which is obviously calibrated to whatever curve the sender actually is using. This would be easy if I could setup a table of voltage to temperature like many sensors, but it appears I cannot do this and can only setup the transform rule which appears to be Input (voltage) x Multiplier, and add an offset. This to me means it MUST be linear. So it may be a complete waste of time wiring this into the ECU. The idea was that the MPVI3 has standalone logging. I wanted to use this instead of a laptop with serial cable (for wideband) for long datalogs. Given the wideband also has electric interference, I may never trust this either in a world where the serial wideband and the analog output wideband do not agree. Last time I did a trace I could see the two wideband traces follow each other, but one was a little leaner than the other. I plan on playing with voltage offsets and actually driving the thing to see how close they correlate. If they never correlate... then, well, maybe I'll never use either. Ideally I'd like to have the Analog wideband read ever so slightly leaner than the serial one, because the serial one is 'correct'. Tuning the car to be ever so slightly too-rich would be the aim. Not needing to have a laptop flying around in the footwell connected with cables is... an advantage. About the only one from the forced upgrade to MPVI3.
×
×
  • Create New...