Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

what ratio is the stagea front and rear diffs?

what ratio is a r32 gtr?

and a 33 gtr?

how can i tell them apart?

cause ive got a gtr sump modified and its got the gtr front diff in it still and i was wondering whether it was the same as the stagea one so it matches the diff one ;)

thanks

Brad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/58738-stag-front-and-rear-diff-ratios-what/
Share on other sites

I thought Stageas where the same as GTS4's, and the autos are different.

Best to count the rotations of the drive shafts versus the input shaft. That will tell you the ratio and only take a few minutes.;)

rs4 rs4v 25gfour etc all seem to have 4.3

rs4s 260rs seem to have 4.1

we had a rs4s rear subframe that we put in our converted car, as far as we can see its identical to our gtr ones (electric hicas etc)

the 260 and the rs4s subframes are narrower than the normal non hicas subframe in the stagea tho, so you will want spacers on the wheels

hope that makes sence

okay have heard of rs4 and rs4v but what is an rs4s? Is that a manual version or something, ie the 1998 onwrds series 2? Just have never seen reference to an rs4s edition. What is different in the spec?

thanks saft.

PS any luck on the exhaust bits as yet?

ahha, cool on the rs4s spec. No dramas on the zorst. thanks for trying though dude. I'm in no rush, probably will get it sorted out at some stage, but if by chance you come across the bits required to complete the set, just PM me through SDU or something, I'm on there more than here obviously, but I'll find the PM here anyway. cheers and have a great break.

rs4 rs4v 25gfour etc all seem to have 4.3

rs4s 260rs seem to have 4.1

we had a rs4s rear subframe that we put in our converted car, as far as we can see its identical to our gtr ones (electric hicas etc)

the 260 and the rs4s subframes are narrower than the normal non hicas subframe in the stagea tho, so you will want spacers on the wheels

hope that makes sence

The build plate on my RS4V states a final drive of RC 40, which tells me it's an R200 @ 4.083:1. This data corresponds to what is printed on page 108 or the 2003 Nismo catalogue:

WGNC34 4WD ~'98/8;

RB25DET R200 (or R200V), 4.083:1

RB26DETT R200 4.111:1

from Aug 98 onwards;

RB25DET M/T R200V 4.111:1

RB25DET A/T R200 (or R200V) 4.083:1

RB26DETT R200 4.111:1

The shortest diff available was in the 4WD RB25DE '98/8~ at 4.363:1

The R32/33 GT-R's are listed at 4.111:1, while the R34 is a 3.545:1 !!!

well i pulled my stagea front diff apart and the diff crown wheel says LS48:11

and what i beleive is a gtr front diff (my enlarged sump) i checked the crown wheel and it said LS37:9

does this mean 4.11 for the stagea?

and 3.79 for the gtr? (might possibly be a sump from a gts-4 ??)

any ideas guys???

well i pulled my stagea front diff apart and the diff crown wheel says LS48:11

and what i beleive is a gtr front diff (my enlarged sump) i checked the crown wheel and it said LS37:9

does this mean 4.11 for the stagea?

and 3.79 for the gtr? (might possibly be a sump from a gts-4 ??)

any ideas guys???

The first number is the number of teeth on the crown wheel. The second number is the number of teeth on the pinion, so..........

48 divided by 11 = 4.363636364

37 divided by 9 = 4.111111111

Hope that helps :(

well i pulled my stagea front diff apart and the diff crown wheel says LS48:11

and what i beleive is a gtr front diff (my enlarged sump) i checked the crown wheel and it said LS37:9

does this mean 4.11 for the stagea?

and 3.79 for the gtr? (might possibly be a sump from a gts-4 ??)

any ideas guys???

It's interesting that you have a 4.3 front diff, what does your build plate say for the final drive ratio?

(it will be 'RC xx')

  • 2 weeks later...
It's interesting that you have a 4.3 front diff, what does your build plate say for the final drive ratio?

(it will be 'RC xx')

the build plate (blue one) says RC40 :P hope that helps

and also to SK thanks for that info mate it definetely helps :(

well 4.3 will be better for take off i suppose and possibly explains the bad fuel economy on stock rs4 stag's, possibly mine may have been changed

whats everyone elses build plate say for RC..????

cheers

Brad

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...