Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The main radiator fan is attached to the water pump housing and its a clutch fan , it only hooks up when the engine gets to operating temp ( DON'T try to hold it while the engine is going ). When you say it works , how do you know ? Its always going to be free spinning , you have to make sure it hooks up when the engine is hot .If you rev the engine when cold it will free spin , do it when the engine is hot and it will make a different soundand blow ( suck towards the engine ) a lot more air .

This overheating did it just apear or has it been happening for a while and it just got worse? when do you hear the belt squiek ?

It doesn't matter that you didn't remove the plug on the block to drain old coolant out .

The reason you do it is to get rid of most of the old coolant , the way you went about it you left water in the block . Next time you change coolant undo that plug , ignition on climate control to max ( hot )and either undo the bottom radiator hose or open the radiator plug , then flush with hose , leave it until most water comes out , do everything up then fill with redy mixed coolant ( buy ready mixed its easier and about the same price , i use 33% but you can use 50% if you like ).

If when you pull the thermostat out it works ok , you may want to buy a lower temp thermostat ( the temp should be on it ) .

Its normal for the coolant to come up when you are reving the engine , as long as it doesn't shoot up .

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Ah, now I know what you mean about the clutch fan - I will test it next time I drive the car. So it obviously gets faster when it "hooks up". I am pretty sure I have heard the different sound in the past but will re-check it.

The overheating has only been recent and on the hottest days - not that many since summer started, but thats Melbourne! First time it ran hot was probably 2-3 weeks ago now, weather was hot and I had just driven the car for 2x short 20 minute runs. Coolant spat out of the over flow as it was bubbling over [in the overflow reservoir]. Problem is at that time I had put the standard Radiator cap on just the night before, which runs at a lower pressure to my Nismo one. I put the Nismo one back on and didnt see any problems until the next hot day I think, which was like a week later.

The belt squeak is usually around start-up time [from a cold start] and usually goes away not long after, say a couple of minutes.

I had the car in my garage when I was testing the coolant / revving and didnt want to get it everywhere!

You have been a great help so far wrxhoon, thanks a lot!

Its hard to see the fan spinning faster but you can tell by the sound , it sounds different when its under load .

Another way of testing it , try blocking the radiator front ( cardboard will do ) , when the engine is hot if the fan operates as it should , when you rev the engine ( say 3-5000) you will see the radiator geting sucked in a little , that won't happen if the engine is cold .

To me it sounds like you have a crook thermostat ( but its only a guess ).

If you overfill the plastic coolant reservoir it will always overflow , even if everything is working well .

At the time of the first overheating / overflowing I hadn't touched the coolant or level in 12 months so I don't think it was related to the amount in the reservoir. Even now it isn't overfilled.

In a way I am hoping its the thermostat that's stuffed, otherwise it could be a much bigger problem...

Running around 110 on the factory gauge is normal on a warm day.

I have since gotten my stock radiator re-cored ($350) + nismo thermostat + nismo radiator cap and even on the hottest days my factory oil temp sits BELOW 90 degrees.

On a normal day it will sit in the middle of 70 and 90. After consistent high-revs (over 4500) for around 5mins the oil temp sits a bit above 90.

It seems the 34's do run a little hotter. You could install oil cooler or do what I did.

I had thought about getting the Nismo Thermostat and may decide to get one if my current one is stuffed, thanks Ed! I already have the cap, but i dont have the cash to do anything with the radiator unless its rusted out or something!

I wouldn't keep driving it around like that... I would get your mechanic to check the thermostat asap... mine was stuffed and I didn't know as I haven't got an oil temp guage (R33) and the factory water temp guage is not really an accurate indicator of whether the car is running hot (and it was)! a month or 2 later my car started to miss whilst cold and before I had diagnosed it as the thermostat I had wrecked my piston rings and spun a big end bearing... I should have had it at my mechanics long before that :)

Im not saying that it was solely to balame for the engine failure but it was a major contributor.

Good luck :cheers:

Guest RedLineGTR
I heard the water temp gauge stays in the same spot from around 80~100 degrees. :)

I have a aftermarket gauge in my r33, not saying the r34 and the r33 are the same but with the stock gauge the point where it sits i've seen temps from 60deg-95 deg and it hasen't moved much from one position.

I am leaning even more towards the problem being the thermostat now, will try and get it out tonight [weds]...

edit: Radiator was hot after the mrs took it for a short trip yesterday, top hose was pretty hot "couldnt leave your hand on it" hot. The bottom return hose was not even warm it felt about the same as the ambient temperature. Engine was too warm to do it last night, will remove thermostat tonight and test.

Any advice on whether using a Standard replacement or a Colder Nismo thermostat is better? I am leaning towards just a std replacement at this stage, nismo ones are probably better suited to track cars rather than daily-driven, like mine.

Opinions? Thanks.

I am leaning even more towards the problem being the thermostat now, will try and get it out tonight [weds]...

edit: Radiator was hot after the mrs took it for a short trip yesterday, top hose was pretty hot "couldnt leave your hand on it" hot. The bottom return hose was not even warm it felt about the same as the ambient temperature. Engine was too warm to do it last night, will remove thermostat tonight and test.

Any advice on whether using a Standard replacement or a Colder Nismo thermostat is better? I am leaning towards just a std replacement at this stage, nismo ones are probably better suited to track cars rather than daily-driven, like mine.

Opinions? Thanks.

maybe your radiator is blocked?

I'm using nismo thermo and on cold days it takes awhile for water temp to come up to norm operating temp.

That sounds more like it. Normally if a thermostat is broken it lets all the water through the radiator, so the car takes longer to warm up. This is also the case with the nismo thermostat, except it opens earlier.

The car doesn't take long to warm up though. There really is no issue with how long or how hot it gets except that it gets too hot AND probably quicker than it should.

What if the thermostat does not open? then radiator runs hotter than normal, less fluid in it, return hose doesn't get warm because the warm water that should be flowing through it isn't because the thermo isn't opening to let it through [at all]...

Igor there isn't much logic to your comment? But I am trying :)

Sounds like you understood it backwards perhaps?

Nismo , igor has a point when he says that when thermostats play up they usualy stay open all the time , not closed . Thats not always the case ( obviously not in your car if its stuffed ) some times they wont open up or they open at much higher temp . Of course the radiator could be blocked , the fan not working and a lot of other things but you have to eliminate the possible causes one by one and the thermostat is easy for you check so do that first .

You cant tell by puting your hand on the hose how hot it is , the bottom hose is always going to be cooler than the top .

OK, I pulled out the thermostat last night and it's pretty much stuffed. After 3 attempts I finally managed to get it to open with boiling water straight out of the kettle. I also tried slightly cooler temps ie. mixing 400ml 60 degree tap water with 1600ml 100 degree boiling water and it didnt budge.

Also after having it open [just] in the boiling water only, I removed it for 20 seconds and put it back in, at this stage I was assuming the water was still at least 90-95 degree and it did not open back up.

The temperature stamp on it says 82 C - so I think it has grown tolerant of that temp.

I have a mate [RedlineGTR] going to Nissan to try get me a replacement today!

I lost about 4-5 litres of coolant mix whilst removing the thermo and also managed to snap the air release bolt [on top of the plenum] in the process ARGH!!!!

I may do another flush or just top up with more of the same coolant... hopefully after replacing the thermo, things start to run normal again. Still need to test the Clutch Fan activity though... thanks!

I agree that igor has a point [a good point] in general I just didn't think it related to my situation.

I also didn't think my radiator was blocked [and still don't] because when I flushed it 2 weeks ago I witnessed coolant coming out of ALL orifices...is that enough to be convinced of it not being blocked? I guess a partly blocked radiator will still let coolant flow at a lower rate.

You know you dont have to go to nissan for a thermostat don't you ? You can buy them at any auto shop , just buy one with a temp the same as yours or if you like slightly lower , say 80deg .

The correct way of testing would be to have a thermometer in the water so you know at what temp it opens . When you say it opened at boiling water temp , how much did it open ? fullly open it should be around 10 mm , not just cracked open .

Anyway they are cheap so just replaced since yoy have it out .

As for the bolt you snapped you will need to drill in the centre of the bolt and use an easyout to remove it , next time dont be so agro with bolts , the snap !!!

If you are not experienced doing bolts up use this rule : do it normaly with whatever , socket spanner ... then get a ringy open end spanner ( have you noticed how they are small for the small sizes and they get bigger as the size goes up ? ) now if you use that spanner do it fairly tight , without busting your finger !!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...