Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well - it turns out my R32 was running R32 N1 turbos already – I've just ?upgrade? to R34 N1's.

It's a long story but I already had the R34 N1s when my engine died, and I honestly had NO idea my orginal turbos where N1 too.

Soooo

I now have a pair of R32 Nismo N1s for sale

P/N : 14411-06U00

Comp A/R : .60

Ex A/R : .64

both in VGC (done about 47000klms) no shaft play etc - where running fine when my bottom end gave way :D

I have NO idea how much these things are worth - but I'm watching an eBay listing for a similar pair (.48 Ex housing tho) that is currently selling for ~1400 ish

talk to my ppl - I don't want/need these anymore - and I'm open offers I 'spose

I'd like some input on their value too pls

will clean them up this afternoon and post some pics for anyone interested

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/65100-r32-nismo-n1-turbos-x-2-vgc/
Share on other sites

heheh how funny this happened to myself this week aswell everything besides the rebuild bit.. i took mine off to upgrade to 34sn1s and they were 32 n1s on it .. from my research $1500 upwards mate.. good luck with it..

OK

I'm no expert - but as far as I know they are steel wheeled, but NOT BB (someone correct me if I'm wrong)

They are rated @ 300ps each - and I think they should be good for at least 18psi (maybe 20 with a good FMIC)

I was getting a lazy 210awka on my GTR with std everything running 14psi boost (pots 4 and 6 where shot tho). They give good boost early and hold on strong across the full rev range (I have the output of a power run somewhere if you're keen)

They should be good for at least 250-280awkw (good street turbo) with the right mods. Again someone correct me if I'm wrong.

In terms of price - I agree with OoHArrGTR - $1500+ sounds like a bargain to me. I paid almost $3K for my R34 N1s - and when you see the pics (if you give me your email) you can see these turbos are in VGC - I can't get ANY shaft plat at all !! I cleaned them up this afternoon and the look great.

Having said all that – I'm open to offers at this point

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
×
×
  • Create New...