Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been puttering around http://www.fordxr6turbo.com

keeping a low profile being a skyliner but questions are coming

to mind.

I know these things can be made to go fast in a straight line

with min mods.

But, my question is what are they like around corners and on a

track in the real world? I mean stock do they handle, corner, etc

like a family barge.

I guess any car can be made to handle well with enough wise $

spent but am wondering how much u need to spend on one of

these to make it competitive for say weekend track use? Or do they

handle reasonably well in stock form?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/66504-xr6-turbo-questions/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm sure you could have fun with them at a track day, as you could with anything, but you have to remember they are based off a family car. They are built with carrying kids and towing a caravan in mind, not hooning around a race track. The skyline on the other hand is opposite, and has some good natural handling characteristics. As you said, if you throw enough $$ anything can go fast.

I think if you want to be competitive at club track days, your 40k+ on an XR6T would be much better spent on a GTR. But if you need to carry the kids and tow a caravan around then the GTR wouldn't be the best car for you. Guess you need to weigh up what you want it for.

every thing he just said is right if you want a real car stick to your skylines. i work for ford and work on a least one xr6 turbo each day and i can tell you, your beter off without one. the skyline was a better built car for starters and id love to do a quality comparison between my car and an xr6 turbo but i would probably loose my job. just remember that the japanese take pride in there work expecialy when it comes to designing and building motor vehicles and i can tell you from experience that the austalian car companys dont even come close

and to answer your question they handle like crap

I currently have 2 XR6 turbo's at the moment. One is a ute and one is a sedan for the family. I am a member of the fordxr6turbo.com forum as well. The only reason I still drive a XR6 Turbo is due to the fact I can CHP/Lease them through the business. They are a good car. The ute is fully modified as the sedan is stock standard. The ute has given me a lot of headaches since I have modified it. Such as gearbox. Everything else has been OK. At the moment it makes 330KW at the rear wheels and thats only on 12psi. I have spent 15K though through trial and error. In my eyes you cant go past a Japanese car no matter what.

I took my ute out on atrack day at Eastern creek one day and tell you that it was awesome. The only thing that I couldnt catch around the corners was my mates R32 GTR. He had coilover suspension though, but I have lowered suspension with nolathane bushes etc. as well. He would zip past me through the corners and I would come straight past him in the straight. The other thing with having that amount of power that my ute has it is a bit of a problem trying to keep the power to the ground. Even when I change into second gear with the triptronic and nail it, it wheelspins/fishtails.

I honestly found the XR6Turbos are good family car and work horse in my books.

I spose in the back of my mind I was comparing the Auto R34GTT to the Auto XR6 Turbo. GTR isn't an option as I need 4 doors.

I have read some track tests giving it to the GTT and others giving it to the XR6t. I'd assume that the XR6t's tiptronic is possibly better and faster than the older GTT's. On paper the power to weight ratio between the 2 (stock) is negligible. Although it blows me away that you can just reprogram the Fords's chip and get approx 300rwkw.

I get the feeling that the GTT would have it on the corners but the XR6t would have it on the straight. Overall I think they would perform similar and that driver skill would be the determining factor provided both vehicles hold it together.

I've heard good things about GTT's in the handling dept, the twisty stuff puts a :) on my dial.

Don't believe it for second when someone says the XR6T handles

like crap, they don't. They are the best handling Aussie made car at the moment, you only have to read Australian Car Magazine's like Motor and Wheel's where they both score the XR6T best for handling. Motor even took a lightly modified XR6T to Tassie a couple of years ago for a rally and it cained alot of exotics, even a R33 GTR. The GTR owner said it was the first time someone had past him. As for the engines, they are very strong, Nizpro have taken the XR6T beyond 1000 horsepower and the new 6 speed should handle the goods. The beautiful thing about skylines though, is that they are stronger and better engineered.

... you have to remember they are based off a family car. They are built with carrying kids and towing a caravan in mind, not hooning around a race track. The skyline on the other hand is opposite

*Cough* BS *Cough*

I am no fan of Commodores/Falcons, but that' not right. The Skyline has always been based on a 4-door family sedan, just like the Commodore/Falcon.

LW

That is true, they are heavy cars but look at German cars and it's the same deal over there with 4 door sedans. What can you do.

Falcons are getting to their limit in terms of weight, I cant imagine anymore engineering to go into it that would make it heavier, unless it got high tech like Mercs and added lots of computer hardware and other gadgets. The problem is people wont buy them if petrol keeps going up and consumption is increased, so you would think losing kilos would be on Fords agenda.

*Cough* BS *Cough*

I am no fan of Commodores/Falcons, but that' not right.  The Skyline has always been based on a 4-door family sedan, just like the Commodore/Falcon.

LW

Care to explain more? I don't know much about the older skylines, but somehow i don't think the R32/33/34 skylines are/were based off a 4door family sedan?

somehow i don't think the R32/33/34 skylines are/were based off a 4door family sedan?

Somehow I think your wrong :cheers:

As you can see here -- http://www.japanesesportcars.com/skyline/specs/ -- even the R32/33/34 lines had bargin basemount family carrying models. Base model R32s came with CA18I or RB20E lumps of iron; R33s with RB20Ds, and R34s with RB20DEs. Obviously these cars were hardly performance oriented: they were designed as the high volume models.

LW.

Just because there were some that came with lower end engines etc, doesn't mean they were designed around that.

I dont _know_ but thought the skylines were designed around the GTR, and the rest were based of being the GTR's baby brothers etc... as opposed to Say Falcons, they are based of a family car, and the XR6/XR8's just have a bigger engine and a couple of other things thrown at them? Now you have me intersted - how can we find out?

use firefox :cheers: (if you are then *shrugs*) haha

Yeah history/older skylines probably were based on passenger cars etc...

I may be wrong about the late model skylines 32/33/34 being based of more of a race car than family car, but the point i was trying to make, is Falcons/Commodores are good family cars (build quality isn't always the best), good to tow the caravan etc.. things that skylines (GTRs, gtst coupes etc) aren't really made for, the same way falcons and commodores aren't made to race around a track...

Care to explain more? I don't know much about the older skylines, but somehow i don't think the R32/33/34 skylines are/were based off a 4door family sedan?

bet you didn't know that the skyline shares the same floorplan structure/design as the silvia....

HPI did a big feature on the linage of the GTR a while back.

I own a GTR with modded handling and it is much sharper than my Father-in-laws XR6, that said, for a big heavy car it handles well and I like to drive it.

It is not as 'involving' as the GTR, and it feels like I'm sitting on the old Massey ferguson from the driving position, but it has good squirt and makes a great family car. I'd get the XR6T especially if leasing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...