Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Mivec 1.6l 138kw standard

Evo 1 Front Brakes and Jap Spec Rear Discs

Race exractors RPW

16' shadow chrome Mags

1995 cc lancer coupe body,

engine has water leak. as i've got the 33 to mod, the lancer is in the too hard basket!!

upgraded to family 4 door 33 so no need for the second car

evo body kit also avail.

Price Drop $4k wiith out bosy kit

4.5k with unpainted kit.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69828-mivec-16/
Share on other sites

hey mate.

im in perth,i was looking for a cheap cc lancer to do this exact swap on but since ouve already done it ill save me the hassel.

im keen to hav a look if u can send me some details to either my email [email protected] or sms to 0400999162.

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69828-mivec-16/#findComment-1302927
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

Is this still available?? I may be interested as i've bought a house so the silvia's gotta go for a cheaper car to run.

As far as I'm aware the 1.6 mivecs were 175ps -> 130kw's. Anyway still interested, do you know what year mivec engine it is and how many km's.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/69828-mivec-16/#findComment-1443029
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...