Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well i couldnt wait so i installed the bleedvalve not long ago and took the car for a fang. initial impressions are that revs build up alot fast and smoother - dont know how, but most importantly it holds the pressure bloodly well. best $35 ive spent at this stage it beats my profec a ebc which needed to learn boost curves yaada yadaa. but with this one, its just straight on, set and drive. one happy chappy, cheers mark.

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

i just installed mine this arvo, went for a thrashing. i noticed when i stepped on the pedal (3rd gear) it pulled from 3'thou rpm to about 7'thou with no signs of boost drops or spikes. i didnt adjust it yet, as it came pre-adjusted and the reading on the boost guage was 0.7bar = 10ish psi?

anyways here a pic of the install as i noticed some people had difficulties determining what went here :unsure:

this bleedvalve is on a sr20 but i dont think it make a difference to what car it is. one line goes to actuator and the other goes to intake pipe.

post-1473-1128420587.jpg

so let me get this straight.....

With this controller you can only INCREASE boost......

The reason im asking is my R32 is running 13psi and this uses more fuel and creates more heat then i would want..... i want to put it on about 10 for the street and raise it for the track.....

Is this possible?

Cant you just use ur right foot to control boost? if u want two different settings i would suggest you get a different setup. Something with a high/low switch or something like that.

lol.. Use your foot, its not like the rb20det is known for its early boost build. :D

For the track you would want it the other way around.

Less boost for the track, more for the street.

Having a higher boost on the street is much much safer and creates much less heat than the lower boost would at the track.

Edited by Cubes

i wouldnt mind a hi low switch but i dont see any going for $35......

I dont mind a minute or so under the bonnet.....

Cubes... sorry to sound blunt but how is this so? higher boost creates less heat?? yet uses more petrol tho?

Keeping on the throttle for long periods of time is what creates high heat; that and poor tuning (retarded ign. timing and lean afrs)

Fit a highlow you will find it a novelty, after a couple of weeks you will leave it on high and use your foot to control boost.

Controlling boost with the right foot is a very easy thing to do, especially with the rb20det as its a little sluggy to make decent boost. i.e 3000-3500rpm and a decent amount of throttle. :D

Edited by Cubes
Keeping on the throttle for long periods of time is what creates high heat; that and poor tuning (retarded ign. timing and lean afrs)

Fit a highlow you will find it a novelty, after a couple of weeks you will leave it on high and use your foot to control boost.

Controlling boost with the right foot is a very easy thing to do, especially with the rb20det as its a little sluggy to make decent boost. i.e 3000-3500rpm and a decent amount of throttle. :)

You mean advanced ign. timing... ;)

Longer burn = more energy produced = more power = more heat !

Retarded ignition timing creates high EGT's and essentially makes everything hotter.

Just did a quick google to provide you with a link.

Improper timing - increase in EGT means retarded ignition, decrease means advanced ignition.

http://www.grumman.net/~n4170n/EGTTroubleshootingTable.html

Edited by Cubes
Retarded ignition timing creates high EGT's and essentially makes everything hotter.

Just did a quick google to provide you with a link.

http://www.grumman.net/~n4170n/EGTTroubleshootingTable.html

Advancing the ign. will have the same effect, primarily on the internal combustion temperatures (a more direct effect than EGT). This is also why advancing your timing too much causes "pinging" (usually combined with lean AFR's).

I'd be less worried about retarded timing than advanced timing... EGT's wouldn't jump by a huge amount (although they would increase, as more fuel would be burning in the exhaust side)... i'd mainly worry about oxygen sensors and cats, which would die quicker as a result of the increased temps. I'd imagine the increase in charge temperature (being that the turbo would get a bit hotter) would be pretty small if you had a decent intercooler!

:(

Just my 2 cents... I see where you are coming from though.

So what is it then?

You would rather what? Tune lean run less ignition timing?

or tune a little richer and run more ignition timing?

I am talking about a whole package, not just playing with ignition timing or just with fuel.

Consider most hipo motors, how they are tuned.

They don't lean the suckers out and run stuff all ignition timing, they tend to run them richer and keep the ignition timing in there, especially around peak torque.

Obviously if you dial in too much fuel you will see egt temps climb due to what is known as afterburn. Its a balancing act, if you really hammer the car around the local track I would definitely consider investing in an egt temp guage. Its the only way to achieve the safest tune.

I should also mention the japs tend to tune a little richer and run a little more ignition timing in their drift cars.

I've done quite a bit of research in to the theory of tuning and feel I have quite a good idea what is going on.

A richer tune that allows a little more ignition timing is a safer tune.

EDIT: ESPECIALLY for ceramic turbine turbo's.

:(

Edited by Cubes

That makes alot of sense Cubes. Will take that into consideration when I get mine tuned. So instead of the usualy 11.8:1 - 12.1:1 AFR people are aiming at, if you have ignition control as well you reckon something like 11.5:1 with advancements in timing is better?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...