Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What's everyone think of the proposed speed limit changes, it's pretty much knocking of 10km/h everywhere. I think it's a shit idea, I think the govenment should make defencife driving courses compulsary, and teach people to drive.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/75693-proposed-speed-limits/
Share on other sites

What's everyone think of the proposed speed limit changes, it's pretty much knocking of 10km/h everywhere.  I think it's a shit idea, I think the govenment should make defencife driving courses compulsary, and teach people to drive.

I was waiting for this to come up. Thought it would of been a hot topic by now. I can't really see it doing anythign except raising revenue again with speeding fines from everyone.

As for the proposed limits i really can't believe that it can go ahead with something so stupid.

Its not the limits that the need to look at in all honesty. I know that speed has an influence on most accidents these days but when you look at what the person is driving/riding and the power and experience of a machine capable of what they are these days say's a lot to me.

Maybe think of bringing in power to wait laws like other states for bikes and have a limit to the capacity and power that a leaner (L & P drivers) and a set age inforced as well.

Like sav man said, make driving courses compulsory for people to do and that way then most people will at least ahve the basics down for defence driving.

Just my 2cents but i can't see the drop in spped doing anything other than making the government money :confused:

ive seen driving instructs and even chief of RACT say its a stupid idea.. i reckon it would mean more road fatalitys.

what pisses you off the most, someone overtaking you or getting stuck behind a car doing 90 in a 110 zone?

I don't care if people overtake me, it's their licence. But i hate drivers who drive under the speed limit, if your not confident doing 110km/h you shouldn't have a licence. And if your car won't do 110km/h safly it shouldn't be road werthy.

PHaT MR30: do you mean dropping the speed would increase deaths? cause I think it will, because you lose consentration if you drive real slow. America increased their speed limits (by ~10 km/h) and got less deaths on the roads.

America increased their speed limits (by ~10 km/h) and got less deaths on the roads.

Yeh but Australian government are deadshits that won't listen to anyone, they are ALWAYS right and don't care about the opinions and lives of others as long as they get more revenue... :confused:

Yeh but Australian government are deadshits that won't listen to anyone, they are ALWAYS right and don't care about the opinions and lives of others as long as they get more revenue... :confused:

Yep, another way to make more money so they get more in there own pockets every year as they are so hard done by and dont get paid enough to be friggen half whit tools as it is!!!!

I cant see this doing anything except causing more accidents with all the people that dont agree with it. People speed as it is and this isn't going to chnage that either. :chairshot

I don't care if people overtake me, it's their licence.  But i hate drivers who drive under the speed limit, if your not confident doing 110km/h you shouldn't have a licence.  And if your car won't do 110km/h safly it shouldn't be road werthy.

PHaT MR30: do you mean dropping the speed would increase deaths? cause I think it will, because you lose consentration if you drive real slow.  America increased their speed limits (by ~10 km/h) and got less deaths on the roads.

Yes thats what i mean, also in america if all the traffic is travelling at a similar/same speed limit over the speed limit you aren't classed as speeding as the whole traffic is flowing at the same rate.

i get so bored doing 110 to hobart imagine if it was lower than that!!!

all the recent accidents are not due to speed IMHO its all due to inattentive driving.

Yes thats what i mean, also in america if all the traffic is travelling at a similar/same speed limit over the speed limit you aren't classed as speeding as the whole traffic is flowing at the same rate.

i get so bored doing 110 to hobart imagine if it was lower than that!!!  

all the recent accidents are not due to speed IMHO its all due to inattentive driving.

Yeah its funny, when there is some sort of accident its automatically blamed on speed, nothign else just that "they must of been speeding" :werd:

Maybe so.........but.........I have been over there (some years ago now) and I can tell you that the road is specifically designed for that purpose. There are slow lanes and fast lanes in the same direction. More thought has been put into it and a heap more money - something that our government is not prepared to spend on our roads.

I think your all on the money. Nothing worse than slow drivers on open roads that make you try do some crazy overtaking.

My Thoughts some legit some for fun

1. Make defensive driving courses part of L's at least 2 times, besides you get a discount on alot of insurance if you have with some companies.

2. make ppl going less then 20 under the speed limit pull over (my dads idea)

3. Anyone ever noticed that most acidents happen at night, so do a bit of both with the limits, increase the speed eg HBT to Launceston to 120 during daylight hrs then drop it at nightspecify some times that account for daylight savings, same way as they do at skewl zones. This would also make alot of drivers drive at different times so they can get there faster,where they shouldn't be drowsy and can see the road further ahead . Im sure we can get some of those electronic speed limit signs like the mainland on the freeways that change!!

4. common sense really if they road is windy don't try go 100 if its only easily drivable at 80 this = Education

I bet the GMENT has not thought about businesses who have people on the road during work hours eg UNI where they pay you to drive from HBT to LST and back thats extra funds they have to pay because it takes longer. so business should jump on the GMENT back!!

Peace ED

5.

I think your all on the money. Nothing worse than slow drivers on open roads that make you try do some crazy overtaking.

My Thoughts some legit some for fun

1. Make defensive driving courses part of L's at least 2 times, besides you get a discount on alot of insurance if you have with some companies.

2. make ppl going less then 20 under the speed limit pull over (my dads idea)

3. Anyone ever noticed that most acidents happen at night, so do a bit of both with the limits, increase the speed eg HBT to Launceston to 120 during daylight hrs then drop it at nightspecify some times that account for daylight savings, same way as they do at skewl zones. This would also make alot of drivers drive at different times so they can get there faster,where they shouldn't be drowsy and can see the road further ahead . Im sure we can get some of those electronic speed limit signs like the mainland on the freeways that change!!

4. common sense really if they road is windy don't try go 100 if its only easily drivable at 80 this = Education

I bet the GMENT has not thought about businesses who have people on the road during work hours eg UNI where they pay you to drive from HBT to LST and back thats extra funds they have to pay because it takes longer. so business should jump on the GMENT back!!

Peace ED

Good thoughts Ed, think ive seen your car around.

My proposed idea for Bass Hwy Between Launceston and Burnie and Midlands Hwy Between Launceston and Hobart is this.

Split dual carriageway with an island inbetween (so two lanes going each way the WHOLE way) this island should have either bush or some sort of screen heigh enough to block the headlights of oncoming traffic.

The speed limit would be RAISED to something more like 140km/h. On approach to the few town you got to slow down for (eg Campbell Town, Cleavland, Brighton, Elizabeth Town, Epping Forest etc) drop the speed limits on the outskirts of the towns to say 100/80/60 (whatever) if the lanes merge back together so be it.

Have a speed fixed speed camera at the lowest speed limit signed through the town (so basically if your stupid enough to speed through there you shouldn't have a licence anyway).

also have +- 20km/h allowance on the open road to allow for overtaking.

IMHO i can't see anyone speeding anymore cos they are going at a more comfortable speed, less prone to tiring and lowers the chance of head ons substantially.

I know this is a big ask by the government but i mean they spend enough on Football Stadiums, Correctional Facilitys, Boats which bring tourists over here etc

if you understand what i am getting at i would love to hear comments

I love that idea PHaT MR30. Aslong as people went the speed limit, or cept in the left lane.

I just e-mailed this to Bryan green this

Dear Mr Green

 

I am writing to you about the speed limit changes you have proposed.  I think they are a bad idea, because it will not save lives.  The real problem is driver education.

Last year I did Berry Oliver's defensive driving course, and It has made me a safer driver.  I learnt how to perform emergency stops on a wet road in my non ABS car, I also learnt about tail gating and how dangerous it is. I used to tail gate slower drivers all the time. but after seeing first hand how following so close leaves no room if the car your following hits the breaks, I stoped doing it.  It also thought me that in main roads I should go the speed limit, not 5-10km/h under it.

If you put money into signing 50km/h zones, and driver education, and getting people to go the speed limit on main roads, here would be a lot less accidents.  Speed is not the problem, in America they raised the speed limits by about 10km/h, and the road toll dropped significantly.  

What I think would be a good idea for new drivers, is that after you get your p's you get 3 months on the road by yourself, and between 3 and 6 months you must sit a defensive during course, or your license is suspended until you do.  Because then they get to see what the road is like before they sit the course.

This is the first time I have ever written in to anyone to voice my opinion, so that is how strongly I feel about it.

 

Thanks

 

Ben

Spot on the money there Tim, Divided roads are the only way to go. This will completely demolish head on colisions. Dual lanes would be excellent as it leaves the overtaking lane. What itcomes down to is a shiteload of money needs to be spent on fixing the roads at least to get them to a decent condition. The RACT idea of putting speed camera revenue back into the roads and education is the best idea ever in my opinion. Roads in Tasmania are disgraceful and something needs to be done about it. :werd:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...