Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The R32GTST is quite different because the Power FC was made by AP Engineering, not Apexi themselves.  It is a bit of a hybrid Power FC with some features found on the GTR Power FC's.  Plus the R32GTST has a map sensor standard, with input to the Power FC (R33GTST's don't).

So when you get the Boost Control Kit it will come with a map sensor that you don't have to use.  The boost control solenoid is simply wired into the outputs of the Power FC.  When you have it, PM me and I will give you the pin outs.

;)

Hey SydneyKid,

Just curious about how you mention that the Map sensor input to the PowerFC where as the R33's dont

If i happen to use a PFC from an R33 on my R32 should it work?

The reason i ask is because i have been using one for more than 6 months now with no problems and always wondered if there was any different between the wiring or connection?

Also is there any difference between the AP PFC and Apexi PFC?

Thanks

Rob

Hey SydneyKid,

Just curious about how you mention that the Map sensor input to the PowerFC where as the R33's dont

If i happen to use a PFC from an R33 on my R32 should it work?

The reason i ask is because i have been using one for more than 6 months now with no problems and always wondered if there was any different between the wiring or connection?

Also is there any difference between the AP PFC and Apexi PFC?

Thanks

Rob

Hi Rob, I have heard of people using R33GTST PFC's in R32GTST's, I have also heard of people using R332/33 GTR PFC's in R32GTSTs. I have not done it myself so I can't say whether it is perfect or not.

AP Engineering supply PFC for models of cars that Apexi don't, they are low volume specialty PFC's that Apexi don't believe it is worthwhile programming for. AP Engineering PFC's are more expensive than Apexi. Looking at our R32GTST PFC (AP Engineering) it is much like an R32GTR PFC physically. AP seem to have devised several program changes (eg; deleting one AFM) so that it will work on an R32GTST. But they have left a few others (eg; inlet air temp) that you wouldn't expect to find on a GTST PFC.

:D

Hi Rob, I have heard of people using R33GTST PFC's in R32GTST's, I have also heard of people using R332/33 GTR PFC's in R32GTSTs.  I have not done it myself so I can't say whether it is perfect or not.

AP Engineering supply PFC for models of cars that Apexi don't, they are low volume specialty PFC's that Apexi don't believe it is worthwhile programming for.  AP Engineering PFC's are more expensive than Apexi.   Looking at our R32GTST PFC (AP Engineering) it is much like an R32GTR PFC physically.  AP seem to have devised several program changes (eg; deleting one AFM) so that it will work on an R32GTST.  But they have left a few others (eg; inlet air temp) that you wouldn't expect to find on a GTST PFC.

:)

HI SydneyKid

Thanks for above as i was always curious about any differences between them.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...