Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The RB30 actually has smaller oil head oil restrictors than the RB20DET/RB25DET.

My R32 RB20DET and the stock dash guage used to drop to zero and show the redlight when jumping hard on the brakes.

The RB30DET does this also. :(

It flashes on for a fraction of a second. But its scary enough I don't do it.

I suspect it 'may' be the stock guage playing up under hard brakes as the rb20det clocked ~170,000km's and was still fine. I'm not going to try my luck though.

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The engine i put into my brothers R31 doesn't have the oil light coming on at all under heavy braking.

However it obviouslly uses the R31 sender and dash guage.

I always fill the RB30 to the H mark as the H mark is still along way from the sump baffle and crank seals. So over filling on the dipstick a little is not much of an issue on the Rb30 engines.

I suppose if your front end dives a bit and you are under heavy braking and don't have much oil in the sump it could move forward and uncover the oil feed pipe allowing air to be sucked in and oil light on.

I also stuck with the factory RB30 oil restrictors. (Top end seems to be getting enough oil, no noisy hydraulic lifters or anything, which would be a sign of low oil pressure or volume)

the oil drain for the turbo return on an RB30 block is simply a big hole drilled through the block above the level of the oil in the pan. i don't know what you guys are on about :confused: it's exactly the same as if it went into the sump, above the oil level of course.

I'm not sure about R32's but R33 heads have an external oil drain which some of us have teed into the turbo oil drain. I can't see this as being a problem though.

Cubes, interesting...very interesting. Like me now, sounds like you are suffering from oil surge. Don't see to many faulty oil pressure senders. If it was dodgy, I would think that you would be lucky get 170K klm's out of your rb20! In my situation, I was hoping that if I plumbed in a separate oil drain for the head into the side of the sump and got rid of the shared oil drain there would be enough flow back into the sump to stop my surge problems under hard braking after sustained high revs. If your setup has the same surge problems WITH the proper oil drains AND with a standard oil pump, I would think that i would be wasting my time trying this and should move onto the next solution and fit a larger/better suited sump pan.

It flashes on for a fraction of a second. But its scary enough I don't do it.

 

I suspect it 'may' be the stock guage playing up under hard brakes as the rb20det clocked ~170,000km's and was still fine. I'm not going to try my luck though.

tried filling it a bit over the full marker ?

to the top of the "F" and then seen what happens?

My 20 cents worth...

We have found that at sustained high rpm (5500 rpm plus) far too much oil gets trapped in the cam covers. What we do;

1. Block off one of the oil supplies to the cylinder head.

2. Enlarge the return passages to the sump

3. Fit an external drain from the rear of the cylinder head to the sump

4. Always run a filtered catch can (filter on top and filled with stainless steel wool)

5. Never run the PCV back into the inlet

6. Use large diameter hoses from the cam covers to the catch can to keep the air flow velocity down

7. Don't rev the engine on mineral oil, use a heavy grade synthetic (Castrol Formula R 10W60 in our case)

8. We always run a winged and baffled sump with one way doors on all circuit cars. Drag cars have a simple vertical extension with a surge plate at the rear and the front.

:D

I'm not sure about R32's but R33 heads have an external oil drain which some of us have teed into the turbo oil drain. I can't see this as being a problem though.

jesus, i just found what you're talking about on my R33 head. didn't even realise what it was! what do i do with it, must it be returned to the sump somehow or can i get away with just closing it up? :confused:

I've seen people with it crimped shut.

However i guess its there for a reason, so i always tee it into the turbo oil return for simplicitys sake.

I reckon fark all oil probally goes down it anyway, always seem dry. Head has an internal drain gallery anyway. I think its more for the extra oil from the VCT supply that needs draining away, as the non-vct heads don't have it.

Real world solutions are what we are after, thanks sk. Anyone other than high energy make oil pans for the rb?

A. Block off one of the oil supplies to the cylinder head

I assume this is internal and would have to be blocked off during the build?..too late for me that one.

Just a reminder boys, I would be less worried about engine smoking and oil burning and more worried about low oil pressure @ mucho revs!! Can't think of anything worse to kill or shorten the life of an engine....Right, my new mission is to improve flow from the cam covers back to the sump.......Will keep everyone informed on the solution........

Thanks again team.

P.S Anyone done a sump change WITHOUT the engine coming out?

Hi Guys,

I am starting to get really concerned, but im hoping its over nothing...

This is the second time now when giving my car WOT in 1st, and all the way thru 2nd... just as i am about to change into 3rd at high RPM blue smoke just trails behind the car and fills the cabin. Its definately not tyre smoke!

Now after about 5 mins the smoking goes away, i pop the bonnet and there is oil all over the cam covers, turbo, exhaust. (This is due to my dodgyness with the breather hoses, regardless it still proves a point that a fair bit of oil is coming out the cam breathers)

Now my RB20 used to do this, but i always thought that was because the rings were shagged... and i hope that is not the case with my RB30DET!!

Anyway after reading Garys (SK) posts I dont comply with:

* dont have a catch can with filter

* revving it on mineral cheap crap oil

I also read the excessive oil in the head when greater than 5500rpm.. I can tell you now I held 2nd gear above 5500rpm for about 10seconds or so...

I looked at my head and there is a flange blocked off... could this be an extra oil drain??

head.jpg

The more research i do on this problem the clearer it looks. These engines have a real tendency to flood the top end with oil with any sort of high revs and need mucho oil return paths and probably a bigger capacity sump for motorsport applications. I can't believe that the major oil return path from the head to the sump on your car has been BLOCKED OFF!! Ahhhh. If you are in my boat and using a S1 vl block (1 oil drain available) you will have to tee it into the turbo oil return line or run a special drain into the sump, or if you have a S2 vl block (2 oil drains available) you should be able to run it into a spare oil return at the bottom of the block. Which ever way you solve it, do it soon. Hot engine bays and excess oil spraying arounbd equals fire.

The Series 2 block does not have an extra oil drain. It has one only!

That plate that is covered is the extra drain that most people are plumbing into the turbo oil drain for simplicitys sake.

I would be suprised if it was the problem. But plumb it back for peace of mind.

RB30-Power.

This oil drain in the block.. I have 2 little copper looking tubes that drain off in to the sump.

I have an 88 VL Commodore Wagon block.

Bl4ck32 has just had his tuned up recently, no problems with blowing oil smoke from his.

He recently made 218rwkw from a small rb20det t3/4 on 16psi.

Definitely sounds as if its an R33 RB25DET head thing.

I am making 256rwkw on the run in tune.

I only seem to have this problem when powering HARD thru 1st and 2nd, soon as 2nd gear is over the smoke comes and the oil has sprayed out.

I am NOT running VCT

 

This oil drain in the block.. I have 2 little copper looking tubes that drain off in to the sump.

I have an 88 VL Commodore Wagon block.

Cubes,

If you have two, one must be tapped as an extra, this pic shows the single drain from the turbo. (Why would the RB30ET have two, it doesn't need two?)

block.jpg

I think its definitely an RB25DET issue. :rant:

I have no external head drain in to the sump.

The only oil drain I have are the 2 internal ones that run in the block as standard.

With the sump off you can see the oil drain copper looking pipes on the edge of the block where the sump bolts are between cyl 1 & 2 and cyl 4 & 5.

I'm not talking external, internal galleys that drain the oil from the head.

As I said previously our engine builder checked it out and said there is going to be zero oil drainage problems. I'm unsure if he fiddled to ensure so or not as I did mention to him how the GTR's throw the oil in to the head at high rpm.

Just a thought..........If the smoke dosn't appear until you change from 2nd to 3rd is it possible the vacuum created through the PCV when you shut the throttle is sucking excess oil (due to no external drain) into the space above the baffles. But instead of actually sucking it through the PCV, it is blown out the breathers?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 😐
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
×
×
  • Create New...