Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I keep hearing that the "V" design is inherently stronger than the inline design.

Can anyone explain to me why?

let's talk 6 cylinder engine here being SAU and all.

say an RB26 (if it were in an NA setup - and there have been some)

compared to the engine in the 350Z's... what is it VQ35 or am I making up engine names..

anyway, why are "V" engines "inherently" stronger than inline?

How are they stronger?

at what stage (power wise) does this strength become a factor?

:cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/79465-v-vs-inline/
Share on other sites

You can make a inline 6 stronger than a V6 or vise versa - just add more metal in the right spot and you will have a stronger engine.

Note: I'm talking about the the block only and for the same materials, casting techniques, etc, etc

Probably more intersting question to ask which is stronger for a given capacity, stroke and block weight.

The V block could prolly be made stronger because they can be made far more compact than a inline, although the extra forces induced by the unbalanced V configuration may outweigh the advantages.

If I was putting my money on one or the other I would go V6.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/79465-v-vs-inline/#findComment-1449483
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • neither stumble or cut really seem to be an appropriate term....hard to explain its like a rev limiter but at 4k, but it violently shakes engine and entire vehicle as the rpms will not rise over 4k, even with slow acceleration. as soon as it hits 4k, it sounds like entire spark is lost entirely. plugs were 1.1 which I used as such, but later put in new plugs gapped down to .8 changed back after issue arose when I replaced the coils, still does it with either plug gap...damn and it was all running so good.
    • Oh how times have changed! I actually lean it out relative to my water/methanol injector duty cycle. The methanol adds a lot of fueling and you can then lean it out even more due to reduced knock. 
    • Yeah my thoughts are the same, a well thought out WMI setup, would be slightly ahead of just straight E85 and you're also chemically intercooling the charged air, dropping it even further. This is why you need to add so much more fuel as soon as you spray. I remember someone taking me through their set up before (Dennis, has a R33, lives around Cabramatta - no idea if he's still around on this forum). He would target AFR 10:1 on 98, then as WMI ramped on, AFR would lean back up to 11:1. Amazingly, he did this all through his PowerFC, a relay to cut power to his EBC solenoid if there was not enough line pressure on his WMI kit. And of course, if there wasn't any boost made above gate pressure, you wouldn't be accessing the load cells with heaps of timing for WMI. One downside to that rudimentary setup, once the WMI came on, the EBC would unleash the dragon, and of course all the timing. Tyres would fry lol.
    • Shimmed or shimless, still solid, no hydraulic pump up stuff.
    • They have said food will be limited. Mainly meat pies and sausage rolls from memory. But they have a coffee van!
×
×
  • Create New...