Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

was the pedestrian on a pedestrian crossing?

I think you know where I'm heading with that question.

Also are you dead sure thats a GTX V-Spec.

Coz you have the GT-T wheels and a front strut brace.

If you have the GT-T front brakes and suspension as well, your car is a GT-V.

I could be wrong, just overly suspicious/curious at what I can gather from your pics. <_<

well if it was a GTT, then there would be gauges above the sterio for boost oil and battery charge..

a GT-V has the turbo model brakes, suspension, strut brace and wheels but runs the N/A RB25DE not the DET, so there will be no turbo-spec 3 guage console above the stereo.

I never said it was a GT-T.

Like svd164 and shim said, check out the dash. Take a picture if you're unsure and these guys will be sure to be able to tell you what you've got :)

this a 2001 series 2 GT-V..all the turbo gear without the turbo,can`t say ive heard of a GTX-V ,thought it was 1 or the other X or V

post-7472-1124525905.jpg

Like svd164 and shim said, check out the dash. Take a picture if you're unsure and these guys will be sure to be able to tell you what you've got :)

thanks man I'll suds it out. Just came back from work tonight, damn tired. saw a lancer(don't think it was an evolution) with evolution kit and all. nice ride.

where abouts on the dash should i be looking at?

this a 2001 series 2 GT-V..all the turbo gear without the turbo,can`t say ive heard of a GTX-V ,thought it was 1 or the other  X or V

I am roughly guessing its what you said, but i'll check it out just to be sure.

I've already looked over the pics again on your webpage and you don't have the turbo-spec 3 guage console above the center aircon vents. I'm going out on a limb saying that it is a GT-V coz from all my research through the Nissan Japan R34 pages I have'nt seen a GT-X V-Spec. Translate these pages for a bit more info http://history.nissan.co.jp/SKYLINE/R34/0008/SPEC/soubi.html

http://history.nissan.co.jp/SKYLINE/R34/00...PEC/syogen.html

The car yard probably just called it that coz they only ever knew of the GT-X being N/A and knew of no other model designations for N/A R34's.

Reggie.

I've already looked over the pics again on your webpage and you don't have the turbo-spec 3 guage console above the center aircon vents.  I'm going out on a limb saying that it is a GT-V coz from all my research through the Nissan Japan R34 pages I have'nt seen a GT-X V-Spec.  Translate these pages for a bit more info http://history.nissan.co.jp/SKYLINE/R34/0008/SPEC/soubi.html

http://history.nissan.co.jp/SKYLINE/R34/00...PEC/syogen.html

The car yard probably just called it that coz they only ever knew of the GT-X being N/A and knew of no other model designations for N/A R34's.

Reggie.

:( hey man cheers for going through all these trouble in trying to help me identify my car. to be frank i never did any research on skylines when I'd brought this - I was going for a Toyota Supra. Anyway man cheers for all that.

Try this fella if you want i did and was very happy

Sound n Security  0412584747

he can come to you

you can say clint with the yellow 33 refered ya if u want (might help)

hey man thanks alot i'll give him a call 1st thing in the morning :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...