Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Item: Alpine MRV-1507 amplifier

Location: Nowra

Item Condition: BRAND NEW

Price: $650

Contact Details: PH 0421582221

I have for sale a brand new ALPINE MRV-1507 Amp.

I live in Nowra on the south coast. Note. these amps retail for $730 US dollars

Amp has to go.

Ph: 0421582221

$650

This amp was bought to drive four 12" subs in a car i had. Crafted a custom fiberglass enclousure in the boot. Crashed the car before I fitted the amp.

I have since gorn away from car audio. The amp is brand new and has never been used. I use to work as a custom car audio installer and bought the amp after my boss won the SQ PRO class at summernats twice with one of these amps.

Read the specs and a review as attached below:

AlpineMRV_1507p.jpg

Alpine MRV-1507

With a stylized design and solid performance, Alpine’s latest class AB amp offers big power.

Alpine MRV-1507 Specs

Price & Contact: $730 USA; 310-326-8000

All measurements @ 14 volts unless otherwise specified.

Frequency Response (4 Ohm IHF Load 20Hz to 20 kHz, 1 kHz Ref.): +0 dB, -0.2 dB

L/R channel error, max deviation 20 Hz to 20 kHz: 0.2 dB

Phase Response (4-ohm IHF Load 20Hz to 20kHz 1kHz Ref.): +6.5 degrees, -12.3 degrees

Signal-to-Noise Ratio (Below Rated Output, “A” weighted): -118.2 dB

Distortion at Rated Output @ 1 kHz: 0.25% @ 900 watts

Output Power(resistive) minimum output 20 Hz to 20 kHz @ 1%THD+N (all channels driven into 4 ohms): 274 watts x 2 @ 14 volts; 225 watts x 2 @ 12.8 volts; 140 watts x 2 @ 10.5 volts

Output Power (resistive) minimum output 20 Hz to 20 kHz @ 1%THD+N (all channels driven into 2 ohms): 455 watts x 2 @ 14 volts 371 watts x 2 @ 12.8 volts; 227 watts x 2 @ 10.5 volts

Output Power (4-ohm IHF Reactive Load @ 60 Hz to 1% THD+N): 995 watts

Crosstalk (Referenced to Rated Output, 20 Hz to 20 kHz): -52 dB

Damping Factor @ 100 Hz, 2 ohms: 348

Voltage for Rated Output: 215mV to 4.5 volts

Idle Current Draw: 1.5 amps

Current Draw @ 1/3 Maximum Power: 63.5 amps @ 316 watts

Efficiency @ 1/3 Maximum Power: 36%

Power-Up Noise: -3.7 dB SPL

Power-Down Noise: 22 dB SPL

by Brian Smith

The MRV-1507 is a two-channel amplifier with power ratings of 225 watts x 2 or 900 watts x 1 into 1-ohm loads and 450 watts x 2 into 2-ohm loads. Features include an internal crossover and subsonic filter, line level outputs, fan-forced cooling, and a low frequency EQ with full parametric operation.

Performance

I’ll give it to you straight — You’d be hard pressed to find one that performs better overall than the MRV-1507. I’ve seen a whole lot of class A/B’s in this power range over the past few years and have come to dread them. They’re usually the biggest of pains to deal with and are often frighteningly unstable. Anything that draws 140 amps and hums like a high voltage transformer is bound to cause some apprehension. There are times when one feels led to probe the limits carefully, lest the magic smoke should appear.

By comparison, the MRV-1507 ran with no more fuss than a good amp half it’s size. Of course, it has a much larger appetite than a 100-watt x 2 unit, but it’s very well behaved and produces impressive performance specs. Signal-to-noise of 118 dB and 36 percent efficiency at 1/3 power are pretty rare numbers, especially in a kilowatt amp.

Connections & Adjustments

The MVR-1507’s chassis is laid out with power connections on one end and input/output connections and configuration switches at the other. All of the units variable controls are located on top of the heat sink with a protective cover. Connections to the amp include RCA inputs, RCA line level outputs, and 1/2-inch spade receptacles for all power and speaker connections. The amp has an extra B+ connection, which can be used to bypass the internal fuse and line choke. Switched adjustments include input mode, phase invert, crossover enable, and parametric EQ enable. Variable adjustments include input sensitivity, high pass cutoff frequency (30 Hz to 200 Hz), low pass cutoff frequency (30 Hz to 200Hz), and the parametric EQ controls, which include center frequency (30 Hz to 200 Hz), Q factor (1 to 10) and boost/cut (+/-12 dB), and a fixed subsonic filter.

Installation

A parametric bass EQ? Hello, now you’ve really got my attention. Simple bass boost is one of the most useless features in car audio. It wasn’t designed to fix problems; rather, the idea was to give the customer more of what they already had (bass). If you don’t know any better, or are primarily concerned with being obnoxiously loud, that might sound like a good idea. However, if you’re looking for SQ and do know better, then an arrangement such as the one found here will be much more likely to satisfy. The ability to cut rather than boost is particularly helpful. You can actually smooth a lump in response with a little bit of cut, but all the boost in the world will never correct a destructive resonance. Try removing what you don’t want rather than boosting what you do — it really works. (Alpine reports that this is part of the company’s BassEngine system concept — it allows users to maximize the sound quality and impact of bass reproduction in any vehicle.)

At about 2.4 x 10.3 x 21 inches, and about 19 pounds, the MRV-1507 definitely won’t fall into the small amp category. However, it appears to have a decent heat sink design in addition to fan-forced cooling. All controls are either recessed or otherwise protected and, well, it’s just a good looking amp. The subdued matte gray and brushed aluminum finish indicates that there are a few companies in mobile audio that have retained some measure of class. There’s more than enough room on the top of the MRV-1507 for one of those 1500-watt MAX POWER blurbs, but Alpine didn’t go that route. I guess tacky amps aren’t in their repertoire.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Reading through the engine service manual their advice is do a cylinder balance test. Unplug one injector at a time and see if the idle drops a consistent RPM. You can also do this using a Consult cable which is easier. They also call for unplugging the power transistor, then with the engine off and the fuel rail unhooked from the manifold verifying that you have good fuel flow (even injection, no dripping/leaks, etc) when you twist the CAS by hand. Also verify the spark by pulling the spark plugs and allowing the plugs to ground and turning the CAS by hand. I would also start doing the sensor checks and idle valve checks in service manual. Make sure the MAF tests reasonably, the intake air regulator is sane, etc. You may have to get new spark plugs.
    • This sounds very old of me, however since buying the Tiguan shit box, my view on shit boxes have changed.
    • I've looked up the parts number (41011AL501). It's around $700 OEM. Usually our Infiniti G35 here in Canada have interchangeable parts with my Stagea but the parts number are not the same. I have looked around and it seems the JDM 2005 V35 Skyline (which is the same as our G35) has the same caliper but I cannot confirm. And I can't find a repair kit. The inner brake pads drags on the rotor, seems to be rusty piston. Thanks for the info by the way
    • This coupled with 6-9 speed autos with ridiculously short gearing is why these modern shitbox cars always seem so fast off the line. If it wasn't for those things, Raptors would not seem fast. The problem we have is there is a driveability gap between a more gentle take off and a wheelspinning sideways launch. The difference between ankle flex required to achieve one and ankle flex required to achieve the other is about 0.5°.
    • Yeah I think I'm also with the opposite here. It's 'hard to keep up with traffic' because in the real world I'm accelerating with 15% throttle and they are pinning it. It feels like I'm being an overt dickhead at anything above 15% throttle, so the car sounds like I'm being an overt dickhead to keep up with/get ahead of traffic when I'm really just trying to drive with traffic. There would be no issue 'keeping up with traffic' if we used the same level of throttle input/aggression to drive around. People really do just drive around with their foot nearly pinned in econoboxes.
×
×
  • Create New...