Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

Just trying to remember where true cam measurement is taken from, Memory is telling me at 50 thou (is the more excepted measuring point). I reason i'm asking is i going to measure up the true cam timing and actual overlap of my rb26, so i can reset on rebuild and have a bit more meaning fully information on where the cams are at the momnet.

pete

Pete,

.050" timing is what most cam manufacturers use as it's where the lift becomes a little meaningful. SAE timing is at .006" lift from memory. It doesnt really matter what you use as long as it's repeatable, RB's are a bit of a prick to measure lift, I made up an extension for the dial gauge that bends in under the cam and down again, you just need to be careful that you get the gauge parallel to the valve axis each time.

Hi Guys,

            Just trying to remember where true cam measurement is taken from, Memory is telling me at 50 thou (is the more excepted measuring point). I reason i'm asking is i going to measure up the true cam timing and actual overlap of my rb26, so i can reset on rebuild and have a bit more meaning fully information on where the cams are at the momnet.

pete

Hmm, why are you going to this amount of trouble? If you want to put the cams back in the same place, just mark them. You are going to change the timing on the dyno anyway, so why does it matter where they are now?

:D cheers :)

Cheers guys, just to clarify why i'm doing this is

1/ to get a better (meaning full) estimate of what the tomei cams are ie most other brands of cams from US are measured at the 50 thou lift point which gives you no idea what referrence is to a Japan cam (so i can compare apples with apples)

2/ Sydneykid the other reason is if you know where the cams are in relation to crank (not just setting on cam wheels) you can reinstall/ and reproduct the same setting on a different engine, as you are removing the variables out of the systems, plus you will find setting that work well and can go to them staight up and if you require dyno tune from there. Which can save a lot of time on the Dyno (which equals saved money and wear and tear) because anyone who has tuned exhaust cam timing will tell you it takes alot of time. I should also have the ability to go to a motor and dial in a cam timing i know will work.

pete

I would imagine with the higher pressures in the inlet and exhaust the point of meaningfull lift would be smaller in a turbo engine compared to n/a but as previously said as long as you only want a base line doing it at 50thou would be ok.Companies like tomei list factory cam timing in lobe centre points for in/ex and their duration so you could work out the opening and closing points they use.They also use this for their own cams but i would imagine this is done at "advertised duration" aswell.Using lobe centre points and lobe seperation can be another way of keeping data.This data would also need to be compared to things like boost pressure and the size of the turbo and exhaust a/r as an engine that runs factory turbos at 1.5 bar making say 340rwhp will react differently to cam adjustments on the same engine running a larger turbo with a big a/r exhaust housing running say .7bar and making the same rwhp.This is where keeping a track of exhaust back pressure can also come in handy.Some people worth talking to about turbo camshaft timing/design would be phil morris from motec,clive from clives cams and ivan tighe as these guy have much experience with camshaft design for turbo engines.

Fifty though is probably your best bet with GTR solid lifters for several reasons.

It is the historical figure that most cam grinders call the "advertised duration" and it is almost universally used as a yardstick when comparing different cams. The reason being that it is always going to be well beyond any known starting and ending ramp built into the cam.

Hydraulic cams don't require an initial slow ramp to take up tappet clearance, but solid lifter cams do. Hydraulic cams can easily be measured "seat to seat" at five or six thou lift, because the cam lifts instantly off the base circle. But measuring at five to six thou lift on a mechanical cam is meaningless because the tappet clearance would not even have closed up.

Fifty thou is also good because at that lift the follower will be moving pretty fast, and there will be a lot of movement per degree of rotation. That is good for accuracy. Trying to set a mechanical cam at five thou will be difficult because the lift per degree will be extremely slow at that point, and setting it will not be so accurate.

Pete,

.050" timing is what most cam manufacturers use as it's where the lift becomes a little meaningful. SAE timing is at .006" lift from memory. It doesnt really matter what you use as long as it's repeatable, RB's are a bit of a prick to measure lift, I made up an extension for the dial gauge that bends in under the cam and down again, you just need to be careful that you get the gauge parallel to the valve axis each time.

have to agree

was not very easy to measure but i got i done in the end

pete

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey keep the ideas coming, I'm always keen on projects! But, problem fixed!  I got a cheapie ozito scope from Bunnings and had a good look in and around the bearing and sensor hole. I couldn't see a smoking gun but the bearing looked a bit strange, especially when comparing with a new one. I thought the cover had come off the bearing magnets.  Sorry for pics of a screen, I didn't have an SD card.     Good thing I had the old one to inspect. So, given I'm like a pit crew with wheel bearings and luckily I had a spare bearing because I f**ked up my parts order, I decided to just smash it out. Got the old one out in about an hour. So much easier when the parts haven't had a chance to rust together yet. 😂 And, well, found the problem.    In the second pic at about the 8 o'clock position, you'll see what I think is the tip of the old sensor.  The new sensor has definitely been rubbing but it's all intact, just a little shiny so I'm hoping it's fine.  The car brakes perfectly now and no errors.  I think the job took about 2.5h in the end. 👍🏻 I really appreciate the help in here as usual. Thanks guys.
    • I was only looking because I saw some drops on the ground but it wasn't alot. Recently had it serviced will ask the mech to confirm. Find it strange that it looks standard though, can see in another photo of a random box 
    • So...not sure if you know if that has always been there or why you went looking. It could be old damage from a clutch explosion, or even just the gearbox got dropped somewhere along the line. Basically, you should seal it up to stop oil and dust getting into the bellhousing, but it doesn't matter too much and is not structural. I'd suggest something like a glob of JB Weld. BTW what gearbox oil are you running, I would guess the breather has been spewing it everywhere.
    • Hey Duncan thanks for your reply. Sorry mate I know the photos are shit.  Took another photo for reference. Seems the casing does have a hole in it looking on the net, fluid seeping out. Added a photo   
    • Very hard to make out what you mean, is it the squarish hole with redline shockproof (probably) under it? Is that pic from on top of the engine with the firewall to the left of pic and engine to the right? Either way, spray the area liberally with degreaser and try again, maybe circle the part you are worried about
×
×
  • Create New...