Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Yep I will be back late tomorrow night...

The training has been pretty cool... the funny thing is though is that the training is for a specific piece of equipment that we only have in Melbourne and Sydney.

So basically I do the training for the equipment then go back to Perth and never use it :(

  • Replies 103.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • GTS-t VSPEC

    20904

  • Nizmo

    13582

  • SHUTO-BOY

    6636

  • skyzerr33

    5353

Yeah for sure... Free trip.... Free hotel ..... A Bit of a wander around a new city.... A week off work ( Well training is a bit of a holiday :( )

Hehe I have only seen Mel when she's drunk and when she's hung over ... Both ways she is funny :P

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Ken, Just incase you needed some advice and wanted to talk to me:p

I should be sorted by early next week:D

The quick engine out and back in on the R has got bigger than ben hur.

The Albany w/end competition could be in jeopardy atm.

Bugga !!

Cheers

Ken

Nope, bailed the car to CRed due to a lack of time and Lumpy owes me a favour.

Pulled the engine out and has too much blowby.

Am sourcing the forgies , metal h/gasket etc as we speak. I think this thing is gonna be a rocket ship when finished and will look cool with the blue rocker , polished trust pipes yada yada..

Cheers

Ken

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Ken, It would suck if your not going, but we will anyway, we have other accomodation already booked:D

No will still go but may have to find a backup plan if the engine is not back in time. Has to be machined etc , assembled and run in.

Can see me running it in by driving to Albany.

Lumpy won't let me have the Autronics on till the engines bedded.

Untrust worthy bastard.:(

Cheers

Ken

All it takes is pre planning .... just work out how long you will be gone then work out how much higher than 100ppd you need to not post in the uk and have the average to drop to the 100ppd and then get to that point before you go :(

I hope that made sense.... I am now hell tired and am going to bed... it is 1.15 and I will have to be up around 7.00am... so thats just about it for me.....

I will chat with you again on Monday hopefully :P

Bye bye

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Mmm, sounds good Ken. Blowby from ring-lands? A bit of money to spend, but it should be able to withstand the extra boost from the 581's:D

Yea , I had my suspicions when it popped the dipstick out once.

It's not like I thrash it around a race track or nuthin...

Cheers

Ken

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...