Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all just got a black r34gtt 38000kms, complied last month :cheers:

ill post some pics sometime soon :)

I live in syd and am looking for a good place to do a custom 3 inch full exhaust maybe.

also it came with a non standard BOV, just wondering where i can get a factory BOV as i dont want a defection :S

tnx for any help

Edited by Shado34
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89447-new-car/
Share on other sites

tnx all for the help, ye its a HKS SSQV Blowoff Valve Kit i think.

Trying to geta digital cam, will try poat some pics soon :)

Welcome to another 34GTT owner :)  Damn our private community is growing larger and larger everyday - saw three 34s in the city last night not including mine :(  Was it you?

no wasnt me i havnt done a city run yet :)

Edited by Shado34
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89447-new-car/#findComment-1615126
Share on other sites

yep thats pretty much defectable.. as many car mods are..

If u let it off whist police are close, and the police know what it is. (though they usually call hwy cars to come and look at the car).

Get a stock one quick! :)

Have you tried HiTech Mufllers? I think they are good. Though dont know and never been there.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89447-new-car/#findComment-1615131
Share on other sites

hey all, i was wondering if its normal for the boost guage to be at -0.5 to -0.6 when idle (i know it should be a negative figure at idle but this low?), it goes up to the lo boost and hi boost fine when im driving but this just worries me abit ;)

Edited by Shado34
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89447-new-car/#findComment-1616124
Share on other sites

yea dont worry about it.. The stock gauge is always usulaly very wrong.. bet a aftermarket one its better.. and it has zing factor :D

i havent seen one thats wrong, have you?

the only thing i notice is that they are slow to react (electric) and the markings dont give enough detail.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89447-new-car/#findComment-1630712
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Man, you've got a sunroof....

couldn't find one with a sunroof, unless it was auto...

btw nice car, have you got any plans for it?

nah mine dosnt have a sun roof, i had a look at one with a sunroof but it effects head room...

I plan on getting power fc first and soon turbo back exhaust; then i might work on a sound quality audio system :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89447-new-car/#findComment-1661249
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...