Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

some of them look like 3dstudio or lightwave images.

Very elaborate ones.

*shrugs*, it looks very similar to the artist's impression on the official site www.gtrproto.com

(should've looked at all the images before I linked!)

well.. i'll see what mine show's in 4 minutes.. hmm dissapointed about the whole V8 thing.. and not sure about the whole RWD.. they obviously didn't want to put much more R&D into Atessa...

I would be bargaining on alot of shared parts from the 350Z as well..

Good chance that alot of them a rendered alot of car companies do this :P

The biggest give away is the pitch black windows :D but who knows these could be real..

Either way renders are usually created from the manufacturing data so these images are exactly what the real one will look like.

I like it !! It could have been a bit better but it also could have been a LOT WORSE !! The front and side views are evil ( IMO ) but the back lacks something ( although it's good to see they retained the taillights ) :D

As soon as the Jap tuning shops get their hands on it I'm sure there'll be a modified version to suit every taste :angry: Picture it slammed with a Do-Luck style rear wing .... yum !!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...