Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

IT RUNS, OMG, DOES IT EVER RUN!!, WILL HAVE IT ON THE ROAD IN A FEW DAYS!!!

Hello again gents.

I have a mystery of a problem here. Bit of a long explanation but here it goes:

I have a 1990 S13 240sx with an R32 RB26DETT in and running.

I have the turbos, intercooler, and piping temporarily run with PVC. It's sufficient for plumbing design, fitment, and testing. I have built a downpipe to keep the stock twin turbos which is connected to a full 3" exhaust.

I do have several vacuum/pressure lines unhooked, however they are plugged (not well mind you). I have not hooked up a boost regulator or the BOV's yet. Better to get the motor running well first before worrying about getting that worked out.

When the AFMS are unplugged the motor starts at the turn of a key and runs rather well in "limp mode." It's rpms settle in around 2200 most of the time, sometimes around 1600. The motor responds to the throttle by idling down further. It is ofcourse running overly rich to the point it stings your eyes a bit (I figure this is normal as the engine will dileberatly run overly rich to prevent internal or turbo damage). At no point can I get the motor to go over 3000rpms, once again this seems normal for not having AFMS plugged in.

O.K. now the interesting bit:

With the AFMS (stock r33 ones thanks to HUNGRY 6) plugged in the motor will start, but only up to approx. 800rpms before immediately shutting down. The same goes for having in combination either AFM plugged in one at a time. As well as, with the engine running, if I plug in one AFM the motor will sputter for 1/2 a second and then shut down.

I am beginning testing of the wiring harness and other sensors however this process is tedious and even the solution can be overlooked. I have tested the fuel pressure and it hits pretty close:

Test ....................Standard........Actual

Ign. On ..................43psi .......... 40psi

Idle .........................36psi .......... 39psi

Idle w/o vac line.......43psi .......... 45psi

Here are my thoughts:

In "limp mode" (am I calling it right?) the ecu gives me a set amount of fuel and timing, without knowing how much air is coming in, it's ignoring most of it's other sensors.

When the AFMS are plugged in the ecu then attemps to set the correct air-fuel mixture and appropriate timing. Some other sensor (now that it's out of limp mode and being monitored) could be giving faulty information causing the motor not to run.

Or, something else is seriously wrong and ignored in "limp mode," hence when the AFMS are plugged in the ecu responds by killing the motor. i.e. Faulty ECU or Knock sensor.

Also, it's probably not something tuning related, i.e. bad O2 senors, boost/vacuum leak, etc... I believe these sort of issues would cause it to run poorly, not necessarily shut down the motor.

-------------------------------------------------

There are a world of things to test for, however I'm hoping that someone with a little more experience with the RB series than I (which would be none) could help point me in the right direction as I am pretty well stumped here.

Any thoughts no matter how small or seemingly trivial will be helpful. Our collective brain storming might get me going down the right road.

THANK YOU, THANK YOU in advance, This is a full 1 year prodject nearing it's completion and I am beside myself trying to get it finished.

P.S. located in the middle of the U.S.A. there are virtually no tuners within 5hrs of here that have ever seen an RB motor.

Edited by RB240Dav

With running the RB25 AFMs, What sort of ECU are you running?

if you are running the standard ECU without any extra calibration (SAFC or other) you will not get it to run.

However I would be guessing you are running a PFC?, if so have you selected the correct AFM's on the PFC?

:P hope this helps...

The reality here is you most likely have a whole host of sensor/wiring problems. Limp home means nothing more than 2,500 rpm. In fact "limp home" is a bit of an overstatement, more like "limp to the side" of the road".

The best diagnostic tool I have is the Consult interface, I guess that comes from years of reliance on the Power FC Commander. They let you see, in real time, the inputs from the sensors which makes fault finding so much easier.

There are a number of them available on the forum;

I just ordered one of these, I like making up kits

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=92853

If you don't want to make up a kit, I have used one of these a number of times and they work great;

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...2617&hl=consult

I haven't used on of these, but plenty of guys have;

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...showtopic=92105

Without one of these you are going to spend hours with a multimetre chasing around the wiring looking for an answer. A Consult interface will help you find it in minutes.

Hope that was of some help

:) cheers :)

Well, this is about to become one hell of a learning experience since there is no easy way out.

It's time to get down and dirty, and I'll let you chaps know what I find.

I'm sure you hear it a lot SK and I hope you never get tired of it. . .

THANKS.

I want to run a code check on my ecu by counting the l.e.d. flashes on the ecu, but I have a Nissan Remanufactured One, and for some reason it doesn't have any lights or dials on the back of it, WTF!!

So anyways, I know that you can also count the "check engine light" flashes. I'll splice into the wire coming from the ecu to the light but I don't see a "check engine light" on the instrument cluster I've got (it's not installed) What light flashes?

I want to run a code check on my ecu by counting the l.e.d. flashes on the ecu, but I have a Nissan Remanufactured One, and for some reason it doesn't have any lights or dials on the back of it, WTF!!

So anyways, I know that you can also count the "check engine light" flashes.  I'll splice into the wire coming from the ecu to the light but I don't see a "check engine light" on the instrument cluster I've got (it's not installed)  What light flashes?

Yep, most of the ecu's don't have lights, I kinda figured you wouldn't have a GTR dash in there for the "Check Engine" light to flash codes for you. That's one of the prices you pay for an engine swap. Hence why I suggested the Consult interfaces.

Pin #32 is the output from the ECU to the dash warning light, so try wiring a 12 volt 1 watt globe there, if you can't wait for a Consult to arrive.

:) cheers :)

I remember reading about two wires you short (if you have the diagnostic connector you can jump the pins) in order to get the ecu to flash the codes to the dash. I can't seem to find the thread now, anybody know if I'm on the right track again?

SILLY SILLY QUESTIONS.

Thanks again SK

IT RUNS, IT RUNS, IT RUNS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

There was a break INSIDE the wiring harness (damn importers don't know how to properly pull a loom)

I was wiring up the check engine light to run the codes. So I had to move the harness around a lot, plugged in the mafs. Gave it a turn for the hell of it, and it started, and ran.

OMG, IT SOUNDS SO GOOOOD!!!

THANK YOU ALL!!!!

Good to see you got it up and running, have fun with it.

In those pics youve got quite a car yard there, is that a FC RX7 in the background?

Thanks,

yeah it's an FC. Rather unfortunate incident for the owner, poor guy. . .

It was near mint and he stored it in the winters. (he's 23yrs old) So he pulled it out of storage this spring, started it up and ran out of gas about a mile down the road. Was gone for 15 minutes to get more gas and when he came back the fire department was there putting his car out. The battery cracked and leaked acid onto the harness underneath all winter long, and then wham, catches on fire. Thankfully it went up on the road and not in storage where there were 2 other rare cars. He's going to work on wiring it back up this winter, as you can see, he already replaced the panels.

The motor just screams, I should have it rolling in a few days, just have to finish the intake, brakes, alignment, and install driveshaft. All the tracks are closed, so I'll have to find someone with one of those G-Force tec thingies to get a 1/4 mile estimate.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...