Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Most of us are runing pods and larger exhausts. While others are running even bigger turbos, larger fuel pumps and different ECU tunning. Even the odd gutted cat (pack the panadol for the headaches), its not worth it.

This can change the emissions from the factory limits which should meet the Australian standards.

Any one been pulled up for an emissions check in Qld?

Anyone else from other states been pulled over by their EPA/police/Department of transport?

Did you pass or fail, did you have to get a retest?

It would be a pain in the arse to have to change all your mods back to standard, espically turbo and ECU mods.

I think it is one of those things that is just around the corner, espically looking at the cahnges to some of the import regulations

Maybe dual fuel mapping is the key ...one for emissions/fuel, one for serious power...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9377-random-emissions-testing-in-australia/
Share on other sites

Hmmm. I don't think its much of an issue.. they don't do much in victoria from what i've seen and heard around. It seems like its more of a somebody makes a complaint thing they check it here.

It looks like in NSW and QLD its used largely just an excuse to get some of the high spec ones off the road. Probably the same here but i've never seen them doing spot checks.

If anything, a skyline is going to have much less emissions than older Aussie produced cars as Japan has had pretty strict regs on it for a lot longer than us.

it is an issue Ihave heard of a number of people in vic who ahve been causght and have had to take their mods out to get the car to comply if you have an epa test in victoria nd they see an aftermarket ecu even if the car passes the test the car is failed cause to is not approved. that is why I'm an advocate of the power fc and remapping ecus.

becarful guys when you do your mods this could happen to you

meggala

Regulations for cars will get tighter ; the import regulations for better or worse are an example of this…. Owning a ‘legal’ modified car will take some careful planning with mods…. I could not get over the fact an air pod is a defect ….. How many imports do you see with the standard air box.

Queensland still only requires a roadworthy on a transfer of registration. A yearly road worthy will probably be brought in at some stage like NSW & VIC (?)

Mandatory emissions testing could become part of a yearly road worthy. Random emissions testing would be a great way of getting a modified car off the road.

Japan does have high emission standards but Australia may actually focus on different pollutants and different levels. I read about an import company have a lot problems complying some of the RX7 series 6, 7,8 because (I think) in standard form they did not meet Australian standards. (The current emissions testing is also biased towards piston engines)

Meggala

What’s the go with the power FC does it piggy back onto the standard ECU? Or is it a true plug in system…. I have always thought it was a plug in ….

The Power FC would be a great option but wouldn’t it fail, as it is not the standard ECU?

Sorry about the doom and gloom post, I am not that negative really! I just don’t want modified car/performance car owners to stick their heads in the sand and get caught out big time …. Kind of like the new import regs and its attitude to modified cars …..

We need to be on the ball and keep on eye on what our ‘best interests’ are according to the bureaucrats, politicians and the domestic car industry … and like some motorcyclists organise (ie the mandatory headlights on campaign) some action when its needed….

And maybe not pull off the most awesome drift up some crowded café street with a screamer pipe and no Cat …. I know it its tempting !

:burnout: :)

Mandatory emissions testing could become part of a yearly road worthy. Random emissions testing would be a great way of getting a modified car off the road.

Hmmm, they have talked about this for many years. Even Vicroads testing has shown that there is no evidence to suggest unroadworthy cars have any bearing on accidents. It was raised before parliament at one stage. I think it is one thing that will keep coming up. My thoughts are that it will not end up being brought in due the backlash by community groups and people on lower income - the cost of owning an older car will be pushed up by too much. Quite rightly I think so too - as I spent $2000 on my first car and i just could not have afforded to pay more while at uni, etc. The cost of enforcing and regulating this each year would also be quite a cost to the government too.

I'm more a fan of regular license testing to improve road safety but that is a different issue. I know each state is different. VIC requires a RWC to transfer a car, and yet 3rd party is not compulsory - but in SA requires neither. And NSW is different again. There never will be a unified approach to it all as it really is a state based issue.

I think it is only two aftermarket intake modifications allowed in VIC but i could be wrong. So a pod and intercooler pretty much puts you over. Then it comes down to what actually comes out the other end.

PowerFC is a full replacement ECU. Still its a 15 second job to check it assuming they know what to look for...they just have to see the logo on the box for a start. I assume he meant its more capable to tune to balance emissions better with all the aftermarket gear??

Everybody gets screwed over when they decide the road rules... there is very little consultation other than with industry "groups".

They want everybody to drive a Ford, Holden, or Mitsubishi and "standard" cars or "factory engineered" local or locally imported cars. There is a lot of pressure by these companies to encourage government to force people to buy newer cars for obvious reasons.

To me though .. make a decent aussie produced car for a decent price and i will buy it.. but i can't see that happening.

Not everybody wants to spend 30k+ on a new car every 3 years and go through that "cycle".

I agree .... Once we locally start producing/importing decent cars that are realistically priced ... we will buy them .... The new XR6 is probably getting a little closer but even if you had the money to buy one you would void the warranty once you start modifying properly.

Cars in the States and New Zealand even after the exchange rate tend to be cheaper! Imports do have different compliance standards in different countries .

But I hope that wouldn't stop the import car scene all together.

If the Power FC is a straight plug and play system, you could always plug the standard ECU back in and run standard boost if you are due for your emissions test. Don't know how a different turbo or fuel delivery system would affect the ECU…

The important question is down track can Skylines Australia and other related interests groups present a united front with the import/performance industry if more stringent legislation is placed on the modified car scene.

Legislation is there for a reason, I think its great if we can have better performing safe cars which may not only meet the emission standards but exceed them (some of the tuners out there are great but some are pretty average ie max power, crap mid range and fuel consumption and only mapping a couple of points) …

What frustrates me are seemingly pointless rules such as no pods because they may effect the emissions or it is not a standard ECU even though the emissions may past the standards …

  • 5 years later...

I got pulled over last night and the guys were too lazy or didnt know how to test me instead they defected me and asked me to complete an IM240 test for emissions.

Not sure if I will pass though, aftermarket FMIC, exhaust and POD?? Apparently its pretty common though particularly in rural areas. I got done in the Hunter Valley.

I got pulled over last night and the guys were too lazy or didnt know how to test me instead they defected me and asked me to complete an IM240 test for emissions.

Not sure if I will pass though, aftermarket FMIC, exhaust and POD?? Apparently its pretty common though particularly in rural areas. I got done in the Hunter Valley.

Its becoming increasingly common in Sydney as well.

Where abouts in the Hunter did u get done? What did u get defected for?

A guy on these forums GLTOY has passed numerous emissions tests on his RB25 >300RWKW with his own tune. I think he even tuned it on E85.Just search in the forced induction thread .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...