Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, I recently purchased an R32 GTR, but there seems to be an problem with the torque split system but im not sure 100% if it is, i will describe here what i have noticed and hope someone here has an idea of whats wrong. :D

Everynow and then when im just crusing along, with a bit of throttle usually in 3rd or 4th gear doing city speeds at around 2-3k rpm i notice that the torque split gauge is flickering a little bit, the needle moves up and down and it makes the car a bit unsmooth when it is running. Feels like it is constantly changing between front and rear wheel drive. But this hasnt affected the performance of it though, it still goes hard when i put my foot down but just very annoying. I have taken it down to a workshop and they plugged it into a diagnosis thing to check for error codes, but there were none.

Does anyone have a similar problem or have any idea what the problem could be? The car is stock standard by the way.

Any opinions would be appreciated. Thanks in advanced!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94625-atessa-problem-help-please/
Share on other sites

Phil,

It *may* be a dodgy wiring connection or ABS wheel sender. These usually show up as a fault code on the 4WD/ABS computer in the boot as intermittent faults are typically logged.

On the other hand, it might be getting dodgy signals from the wheels so the computer is thinking there is wheel slip and its engaging 4WD. I've repaired this once before and all it took was unplugging and replugging in the ABS wheel speed senders (which also tell the ECU when to engage 4WD by difference of speed).

Try that and failing it, let us know.

Cheers

Just to back Bozz up,, mine done the same, it was a faulty ABS sensor,,, even stopped the brakes working properly was really annoying.

So where are these abs sensors and wheel speed sensors located? Should I take it to a workshop to get it checked?

If checking those comes up trumps then it will be your 4wd pump located above the diff. Have had a few GTR's and GTS4's with this problem now and it doesn't matter how many times you bleed the system, change gearboxes or transfers it always ends up being the pump. Check out the sensors first though.

hey i sort have same prob,it moves the gauge even when not under load sometimes,also my breaks are dead set bad as,could i have the same prob?

yeah my sguage is constantly moving, like its always in 4wd mode even when i drive normally. But my brakes are okay though. I reckon we both got dodgy abs wheel speed sensors

Only time I've seen that happen in mine is when i go over bumps on the road and see the torque gauge flicker up the scale, if i lift my foot off the throttle for a sec it goes back to normal.

This sort of thing happens in my one aswel - when the awd split is changing does your GTR shake a bit???

Are you in Sydney??

Yeah mine shakes a bit when it flickers. very annoying!

Yesterday i had the car down at the workshop fixing a torn CV boot, and found what causes this vibration!!!!!

Will post up more details when i have more time

Looking forward to your findings!

Before you go wasting money on ABS sensors, check your tyre tread... even minimal wear will cause what you are talking about (mine does it too when the rears start to wear down a bit). Its because the rear wheels are now a different rolling diameter to the front (only slightly, but enough to make the torque guage move around when cruising and make the car jerk around a bit).

Before you go wasting money on ABS sensors, check your tyre tread... even minimal wear will cause what you are talking about (mine does it too when the rears start to wear down a bit). Its because the rear wheels are now a different rolling diameter to the front (only slightly, but enough to make the torque guage move around when cruising and make the car jerk around a bit).

Yeah i asked a mechanic today who owns an r32 gtr and he said the same thing as you. that the different wheel sizes will cause different rotational speed. And I have noticed this has been happening after I got two new front tyres only, and the rear ones are worn. So i will probably have an excuse to get 4 brand new rims instead :lol:

Ok, now i have a bit more time,

We had to replace a broken CV boot on the right hand side, at the same time it was time for a little investigation into the problem, as soon as the CV was off the car the 2 guys in the workshop (Simon and Nathan) saw the problem.

There are 3 symetrical "dents" in the end of the CV housing from the roller part (sorry lack of technical speak) from where the two had clearly been bashing each other for a long time.

Also there was a lip formed at the other end that looked to be caused by the driveshaft grinding away at this point.

Nathan got rid of the lipped sections and put the front back together.

I took it for a drive to get it to shake, it will still shake a TINY bit but only after one of those huge speed humps where the car gets all 4 wheels on it (the type outside most schols). This is really no problem as you can simply wait for the rears to be back on the road and then accelerate. By doing this there is no shaking at all.

Hope this helps guys.

(total cost inc new genuine CV boot was only a few hundred - a small price to pay to solve this issue)

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...