Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

how about getting some of the girls to run their cars? i havent seen one girl at WSID racing her car yet.. be the first!

you obviously don't go to wsid that often do you!! lol!!!

whats your best time?! and what times do you hope to get?!

will try and make it to spectate on the 14th!

i was talking about girls from this forum, because its usually the guys who talk about the drags and that. not that i notice any girls at the drags anyway.

my best was 15.1... embarassing, i know. but it was my first time and my starts were pretty shitty so i was actually expecting it.

im not sure what to expect this time around. im pulling alot more power then last time so im not going with any kind of expectation.

what about you?

Edited by SECUR1TY

Yay we have been cursed again!

Precis For Wednesday Min Max

Sydney: Afternoon shower or storm 22 33

Liverpool: Afternoon shower or storm 21 33

Penrith: Afternoon shower or storm 19 33

Richmond: Afternoon shower or storm 19 33

i was talking about girls from this forum, because its usually the guys who talk about the drags and that. not that i notice any girls at the drags anyway.

my best was 15.1... embarassing, i know. but it was my first time and my starts were pretty shitty so i was actually expecting it.

im not sure what to expect this time around. im pulling alot more power then last time so im not going with any kind of expectation.

what about you?

You should do an easy 12 with 191kw and auto tranny, good luck, i maybe there as well .

Yes, problem rectified. Hard-hitting turbo'd RWD GTR's are not fun, trust me.

HAHAHAHA Charlie,

I know they aint fun. Cause i was there when you tuned your car @ Catle Hill with dave and then took it down the road for a quick test run. Getting it sideways up and down the road ( as if you werent shittin it)

HAHAHAHA Charlie,

                              I know they aint fun. Cause i was there when you tuned your car @ Catle Hill with dave and then took it down the road for a quick test run. Getting it sideways up and down the road ( as if you werent shittin it)

Sounds internesting......i will be out watching. I hope it aint 40 degrees like yesterday.

I would expect a large turn out of cars because its just before 17th drag wars and it was so hot yesterday.

boys I am in!!

bringing the old girl out for a few runs. best was 12.1 last time on 10psi. tis tuned to 12psi, might up the wick me thinks.

regardless, i have a pair of 99% nearly brand new 195/60/15 rally tyres. the tread is deeper than an abyss!

cant wait to smoke em up in the burnout comp.

see you boys there.

mark




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...