Come on ppls... You all know VVT aids both bottom and top end.
Reduce overlap, improve bottom end.
Increase overlap, improve top end.
Without VVT you land some where in the middle and try are forced to be happy with what you have.
Does the SR head really breathe better than the rb20's?
Sure it runs larger valves similiar to that of the rb25's head but it does have to pass 500ml puffs vs 333ml puffs.
Lets look at valve size.
RB20.
Inlet - 30mm
Exh. - 27mm
RB25 (SR's have a similiar combustion size so I'm assuming similiar valve size)
Inlet - 34mm
Exh. - 29mm
333ml is 66% of 500ml.
Do the valve sizes reflect similiar?
RB20 inlet - 88%
RB20 exh - 93%
TO me.. it looks as if the rb20 individual pots have it over the sr/25 type sized valves when it comes to how easy air flows past the valves.
But it also tells me that there is little room for a nice quench area and airspeed will be down, resulting in a lack of low end torque and slower spool BUT a much better top end that will simply keep holding power and not nose off sharply.
So...
Which motor will be better suited to road use... The SR.
Which motor will be better suited to track use... The RB.
Back to the origional question.... Why does a mild SR make power easier than the rb....I have NFI!
Maybe.....
Higher comp ratio, quench area, DEFINITELY a better std exhaust manifold, DEFINITELY VVT, higher lift cams with greater duration that close the airflow gap.