Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Finally got around to having a look at my RB26 head last night and found more wear than I'd run it with in some exhaust guides . SK once said that this is not uncommon for these heads due to the Japanese refusing to change their oil . By the nature of these cars you'd have to say that most of them have had a hard life in the old country as well .

I'm curious as to why a cam lobe over bucket valve train would allow enough side load to wear the guide (or valve stem) - are the std exhaust guides a little on the soft side ie some sort of exotic Hidural Bronze or some such for better heat conduction ?

Can I take it as granted that K Lines are not an acceptable fix .

The burning question is do these heads eat valve guides over time even with good maint/oil/bit of mechanical sympathy ?

My previous experience of this kind of valve train ie FJ20/4AGE/7MGE is that the guides seem to live forever so this is new to me - though was told to expect it .

I guess this leads into what makes these valve trains reliable long term . A good friend of mine (SC) who's been on the tools for ~ 30 yrs said that while hollow sodium cooled valves are good , if they hit anything they tend to break rather than bend . He was recently given two transverse 4AGE's , one of which had dropped a valve or seat and destroyed the chamber and daylighted the piston .

Obviously no one intends for this to happen but I prefer bent valves to destroyed engine .

Also while I'm here , some in the aftermarket are offering different buckets to go with reduced base circle cams for more lift and alternate material guides . Is this the way to go - dread to think of the cost ? Wish list includes highest lift ~ 260 cams but at what cost .....

Sorry so long but need all the facts , don't want to do it twice .

Cheers A .

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/101317-rb26-valve-guide-wear/
Share on other sites

Finally got around to having a look at my RB26 head last night and found more wear than I'd run it with in some exhaust guides . SK once said that this is not uncommon for these heads due to the Japanese refusing to change their oil . By the nature of these cars you'd have to say that most of them have had a hard life in the old country as well .

I'm curious as to why a cam lobe over bucket valve train would allow enough side load to wear the guide (or valve stem) - are the std exhaust guides a little on the soft side ie some sort of exotic Hidural Bronze or some such for better heat conduction ?

Can I take it as granted that K Lines are not an acceptable fix .

The burning question is do these heads eat valve guides over time even with good maint/oil/bit of mechanical sympathy ?

My previous experience of this kind of valve train ie FJ20/4AGE/7MGE is that the guides seem to live forever so this is new to me - though was told to expect it .

I guess this leads into what makes these valve trains reliable long term . A good friend of mine (SC) who's been on the tools for ~ 30 yrs said that while hollow sodium cooled valves are good , if they hit anything they tend to break rather than bend . He was recently given two transverse 4AGE's  , one of which had dropped a valve or seat and destroyed the chamber and daylighted the piston .

Obviously no one intends for this to happen but I prefer bent valves to destroyed engine .

Also while I'm here , some in the aftermarket are offering different buckets to go with reduced base circle cams for more lift and alternate material guides . Is this the way to go - dread to think of the cost ? Wish list includes highest lift ~ 260 cams but at what cost  .....

Sorry so long but need all the facts , don't want to do it twice .

Cheers  A .

i'm sorry if you already knew this but you are awhere that the rb26 exhaust valves run very large clearances i believe because of the sodium find valves that exspand conciderable when they heat up. I found this out rebuilding the last two rb26 (R34,R33) the head shop thought the exhaust guides were gone but once we checked to factory tolerences we found that was how they were surpose to be setup quiet loose.

pete :O

Have you measured your guide clearence?

RB26 max EX guide clearence is something like .004"

(will feel quite loose with valve in guide)

Factory guides are cast iron and prone to cracking,

I change guides in brand new heads for bronze guides in BIG HP GTRs.

Klines are definately not an option.

I have seen a few bent sodium filled valves (RB26 and others) none actually broken.... yet.

You'll find if you check the exhaust guides with a 7mm valve seat cutting pilot they will more than likely be ok. They do feel like they are pretty rooted (technical term) if you check them with the valve.

Edited by proengines
  • 5 years later...

I'm sorry for reviving an old topic, but I've got something to ask.

So there is ABSOLUTELY no need to use sodium-filled exhaust valves if an engine doesn't feature forced induction and I want it to be pretty durable, right?

I'm building a russian engine in 4AGE style, changing all the valves to light 6 mm stem ones. I've got a set of Subaru WRX STi sodium filled exhaust valves, but they would require larger clearences than solid ones, would they? So if I'm likely to build the engine in Toyota durability style, I'm better to switch to solid valves and tighter clearences.

The engine is quite known for burning exhaust valves, that's why I've chosen the WRX STi sodium-filled exhaust valves. (They are almost completely identical, only +0.5 mm in height)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...