Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

if you are using the 400wrms item look at a VPA11500.thats a 1500w monoblock.

also the 80% off retail. I think not.

Gee umm.... My apoligies about the price. And yes, I will be going for that amp, just been added to my contract :(

what would you like to know about the brand.( I sell the complete line.) also did you chat with the dealer or the manufacturer?

the screen you mention hasn't been released yet. I'm waiting on one currently.

I'm going through the manufacturer in America. They offered the screen to me... So maybe its been released in the US?

All I wanted to know is if the gear I have mentioned (with the edition of the new amps) would be enough to crack late 140db's? (with proper sound deadening as well)

Monoblock amplifier with 3000 Watts max power and 1500 Watt RMS

Max. Power@4 ohms 1x3000 watts

Max. Power@2 ohms 1x 4500 watts

RMS Power@4 ohms 1x 1500 watts

RMS Power@2 ohms 1x 2200 watts

VPA 11500 great amp hasn't let me down.....

With the gear you have you should have no problem cracking 140db's

Once you've tried the head deck especially if it is there new dvd navigation head deck can you get back to me on performance only thing that really worries me is the 50Wx4 power of the unit there is alot of higher powered head decks out there.

AMS,

could you fire me a PM with whom you are dealing with. there's a blau dealer in tamworth currently so why bypass them.

after talking to the regional manager of SE aisa in melbourne(who had a chat to the US manager) he says that there is not currently a sponsorship program going nor vehicles being sponsored.

NEO,

the screen/DVD he's mentioned isnt the aspen ( the only ones available are prototypes and these are still in testing.). could be a chicago. to answer your question on power - the chicago does 26wrms /ch and hammers . still better to use an amplifier on them.

VPA 11500 is great isn't it! used one on a set of VPW300s on a slightly tuned box in a hatch and broke 152.

so 140 on the proposed setup is definitley doable.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...