Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 717
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It only took that long as I asked Ben from UAS to ramp it slowly to 4400rpm then bury it :/ Not a great idea ramping from low rpm with nitrous on a dyno under load. Rods don't like it. lol

I was happy with the 190kW no gas - I hope anyone who watched the curve or saw the power vs. manifold pressure graph took note of the values. If there are any old pricks with something to say purely for the sake of saying something still talking i'd be surprised.

Thanks to Adam, Turbosmart and UAS for a great day.

Adrian

whatever u did it was awesome to watch man. Did u end up taking out stock turb winner?

whatever u did it was awesome to watch man. Did u end up taking out stock turb winner?

Nothing like the Nissan hardware doing the sh1t....well done 2rismo.

If only Stace had her Nissan with bolt ons there to blow the "top secret" apart...T88-34GK...lol...put that turbo back on the truck it belongs on!!

It only took that long as I asked Ben from UAS to ramp it slowly to 4400rpm then bury it :D Not a great idea ramping from low rpm with nitrous on a dyno under load. Rods don't like it. lol

I was happy with the 190kW no gas - I hope anyone who watched the curve or saw the power vs. manifold pressure graph took note of the values. If there are any old pricks with something to say purely for the sake of saying something still talking i'd be surprised.

Thanks to Adam, Turbosmart and UAS for a great day.

Adrian

Congrats to the win! :no:

lol no hard feelings now d00dz??

:no:

Naw.. But Adrian musta spent heaps on the car.. powerfc, boost controller? etc...

Mine didnt even have a powerfc!!!! or boost controller.

Ah well... Im surpised at what I got anyways.. It was like "OMG WTF?"

Ya.. Think first run was 170 something which was expected. Then they did another and it was like 178? then they rested the pc and did another and it got 180 something... then they did another and it got final value of 180.2.

So they did like 4 runs of my car yay :no:

Weird dyno... Gonna go back to another dyno next week maybe, just to see the values, coz initially I had 158 without the fmic, turbo back, hiflow.

Its gonna be interesting..

OH GREAT WORK TO ADAM AND THE SAU TEAM FOR DOING THIS. Not to mention UAS dudes.!

Adam any chance of posting all the results in say the Members forum?

It was a FUN FUN DAY,

I was suprised at my result.

I am thinking the dyno reading rather high???

Bought my R33 Stock 4 months ago.

these are the mods i done:

- split dump + 3.5 Hks cat back

- r34 IC

- K&N POd + heat shield

- 35 bucks boost controoler

i was expecting 170-180 kw,

but i got 197.4 KW @ 10 PSI,

something isnt right?

Edited by RBFIRE

Im a bit sceptical of the power figures......

my run was all over the place and yeah my reading was 40kw lower than my last tune.

183kw....stock turbo but pretty much everything else.

power fc

EBC

front mount

exhuast from turbo back etc.....all base mods basically.

first run was 256kw and I was like...nah it cant make that much power.....so I told them and they said the air temp sensor for the dyno had gone haywire, so they replaced it and had another run...183 first run and second got 203 which sounds more like it....but for some reason I got the print out of the 183kw????

Anyways it was a great day despite that and id like the thank adam, steve and charlie and anyone else who helped to make the day possible !!

adam bring bob along next time!! :no:

Edited by shonen
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey crew, Failed my WOF cause of a lower control arm, and I've decided to hit both arms, and also the compression rods at the same time(seems they're gonna be the most likely upcoming failure points from some discussions with the lads over on the G35 reddit). I've looking at these form Z1:  https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-compression-rod-p-40716.html https://www.z1motorsports.com/front-suspension/hayaku-automotive/hayaku-g35-front-lower-control-arm-p-40674.html I asked Z1 if they'd work as it's the same platform, just RHD vs LHD. I basically got told "Lol dunno". Specifically they aren't aware of any difference but can't guarantee fitment as they haven't done it on a 350GT. So guess I'm asking is if there is any issues with using 2005 G35 coupe suspension parts on a 2005 350GT coupe? Orginally I thought it could be something in the way of the arms that each control arm is designed to be positioned around, but that'd be an engineering nightmare for Nissan needing two different shaped control arms 😅
    • ^ This. The mode door actuator is a common failure, as is the actuator and/or the actual valve for the coolant flow control valve. I also don't know how available the mode door actuator is these days. I've been meaning to look into it and get one from wherever is possible, to keep in the shed for the rainy day when mine eventually fails. Anyway, the advice to you is to search the usual NOS part supply places, or even just go to Nissan and see what they list.
    • Have you got a pic of the actuator? My guess is that unit has failed internally and was flopping around, so the previous engineer who owned it forced it to be fully open to cold air (blocking the heater core path). As far as you can tell, is anything else wrong in the system? Likely you just need a new actuator (not sure how available they are) and then "installation is the reverse of disassembly"
    • I'm happy with the Lsailt unit that I put in, it puts full Android on the top screen so you can run whatever Nav and other Apps you want, while still existing inside the factory functionality like automatic reverse cams, audio input switching, retains factory bluetooth etc. Not cheap and the install was moderate (not simple, not hard) Yours is a V36 not V37 though right?
    • Yeap, all the NC's that I originally looked at that had a hard top were PRHT, which makes the roof line look horrible, hence why I said nope to them My only caveat for another MX5 was it needed to have a hard top, and initially I didn't think you could get a detachable hard top for the NC,  like my NB had Again, a big thanks to Matty for helping me source the detachable hard top for my little girl, they are as rare as hens teeth in Australia, and the few people who have them, keep them Also to Greg, for initially pointing me in the NC direction NC PRHT 🤢🤮 Not mine (I really should take more photos of my car), but a NC with the detachable hard top 😁 To me, the difference in how the detachable hard top roof line looks, and how it actually follows the bodies lines, like they do on NA's and NB's, is chalk and cheese compared to the bulbous looking PRHT  
×
×
  • Create New...