Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 717
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It only took that long as I asked Ben from UAS to ramp it slowly to 4400rpm then bury it :/ Not a great idea ramping from low rpm with nitrous on a dyno under load. Rods don't like it. lol

I was happy with the 190kW no gas - I hope anyone who watched the curve or saw the power vs. manifold pressure graph took note of the values. If there are any old pricks with something to say purely for the sake of saying something still talking i'd be surprised.

Thanks to Adam, Turbosmart and UAS for a great day.

Adrian

whatever u did it was awesome to watch man. Did u end up taking out stock turb winner?

whatever u did it was awesome to watch man. Did u end up taking out stock turb winner?

Nothing like the Nissan hardware doing the sh1t....well done 2rismo.

If only Stace had her Nissan with bolt ons there to blow the "top secret" apart...T88-34GK...lol...put that turbo back on the truck it belongs on!!

It only took that long as I asked Ben from UAS to ramp it slowly to 4400rpm then bury it :D Not a great idea ramping from low rpm with nitrous on a dyno under load. Rods don't like it. lol

I was happy with the 190kW no gas - I hope anyone who watched the curve or saw the power vs. manifold pressure graph took note of the values. If there are any old pricks with something to say purely for the sake of saying something still talking i'd be surprised.

Thanks to Adam, Turbosmart and UAS for a great day.

Adrian

Congrats to the win! :no:

lol no hard feelings now d00dz??

:no:

Naw.. But Adrian musta spent heaps on the car.. powerfc, boost controller? etc...

Mine didnt even have a powerfc!!!! or boost controller.

Ah well... Im surpised at what I got anyways.. It was like "OMG WTF?"

Ya.. Think first run was 170 something which was expected. Then they did another and it was like 178? then they rested the pc and did another and it got 180 something... then they did another and it got final value of 180.2.

So they did like 4 runs of my car yay :no:

Weird dyno... Gonna go back to another dyno next week maybe, just to see the values, coz initially I had 158 without the fmic, turbo back, hiflow.

Its gonna be interesting..

OH GREAT WORK TO ADAM AND THE SAU TEAM FOR DOING THIS. Not to mention UAS dudes.!

Adam any chance of posting all the results in say the Members forum?

It was a FUN FUN DAY,

I was suprised at my result.

I am thinking the dyno reading rather high???

Bought my R33 Stock 4 months ago.

these are the mods i done:

- split dump + 3.5 Hks cat back

- r34 IC

- K&N POd + heat shield

- 35 bucks boost controoler

i was expecting 170-180 kw,

but i got 197.4 KW @ 10 PSI,

something isnt right?

Edited by RBFIRE

Im a bit sceptical of the power figures......

my run was all over the place and yeah my reading was 40kw lower than my last tune.

183kw....stock turbo but pretty much everything else.

power fc

EBC

front mount

exhuast from turbo back etc.....all base mods basically.

first run was 256kw and I was like...nah it cant make that much power.....so I told them and they said the air temp sensor for the dyno had gone haywire, so they replaced it and had another run...183 first run and second got 203 which sounds more like it....but for some reason I got the print out of the 183kw????

Anyways it was a great day despite that and id like the thank adam, steve and charlie and anyone else who helped to make the day possible !!

adam bring bob along next time!! :no:

Edited by shonen
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
    • That's my life. Past-Duncan has a lot to answer for
×
×
  • Create New...