Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Seems to me that the air-temp sensore may have been on the way out earlier in the day. Not taking anything away from anyone in particular but does anyone think that a stock 25 can make 175kW on 9psi and stock ECU? Or that a stock RB20 can make 185kW on 10psi with a stock ECU?

Confusing but don't know that it would've affected results or not...

Adrian

Maybe the dyno was still in shock after the UAS Zed as i went on the dyno right after it. :D

I think no matter what going to a different dyno on the same day will give you different results.

I have had my previous cars on a few dyno's and have had a diff from 5-25kw.

Maybe we should just average them out!

  • Replies 717
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

hey it was a great day

i just wanna know if 2riszmo payed dubble for his 4 runs ??? didnt seem really fare if he didnt everyone gets 2 an he gets 4 ???

Nice. Speak to Ben who was running the dyno about that one. Either way my first run was enough. The nitrous runs were all for show :P

Adrian

Yeah well done to the organisers!

I had an awesome day as after my run, one of the guys said I should be getting more than 185kw, considering I've got an aftermarket turbo. And after 6 months of owning my car, I've finally realised that I have an Apexi AX53B70 P25 (380HP) Turbo in my car! I thought it was stock all this time, and never looked hard enough to really check (its completely hidden from view).

Even the last owner told me it was a stock turbo!! lol :D

Time to crank the boost!

FFS!!! What are you waiting for man.An invitation.. :P

The nos runs were the most entertaining i saw all day, a close second was the zed at the end of the day..

I strongly agree with some others that were there all day that there was definetly some fishy figures coming out, in particular the high ones (maybe not high enough) and the low ones (too high!)

Either way i dont care it was a awesome day to watch and chat with the other guys.

i was a happy with 193rwkw.. stock turbo r33 gtst. wish i could have stuck around to see the end results on who won that category.

Adrian (2rismo) ran away with it, with 190rwkw.

Very nice prize eh ?

El Bee

ps I would like Adrian to define "old pricks" from a previous post. I don't think that it is nice to be ageist in this forum, as I have not seen an age limit on membership.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Please ignore I found the right way of installing it thanks
    • There are advantages, and disadvantages to remapping the factory.   The factory runs billions of different maps, to account for sooooo many variables, especially when you bring in things like constantly variable cams etc. By remapping all those maps appropriately, you can get the car to drive so damn nicely, and very much so like it does from the factory. This means it can utilise a LOT of weird things in the maps, to alter how it drives in situations like cruise on a freeway, and how that will get your fuel economy right down.   I haven't seen an aftermarket ECU that truly has THAT MANY adjustable parameters. EG, the VAG ECUs are somewhere around 2,000 different tables for it to work out what to do at any one point in time. So for a vehicle being daily driven etc, I see this as a great advantage, but it does mean spending a bit more time, and with a tuner who really knows that ECU.   On the flip side, an aftermarket ECU, in something like a weekender, or a proper race car, torque based tuning IMO doesn't make that much sense. In those scenarios you're not out there hunting down stuff like "the best way to minimise fuel usage at minor power so that we can go from 8L/100km to 7.3L/100km. You're more worried about it being ready to make as much freaking power as possible when you step back on the loud pedal as you come out of turn 2, not waiting the extra 100ms for all the cams to adjust etc. So in this scenario, realistically you tune the motor to make power, based on the load. People will then play with things like throttle response, and drive by wire mapping to get it more "driveable".   Funnily enough, I was watching something Finnegans Garage, and he has a huge blown Hemi in a 9 second 1955 Chev that is road registered. To make it more driveable on the road recently, they started testing blocking up the intake with kids footballs, to effectively reduce air flow when they're on the road, and make the throttle less touchy and more driveable. Plus some other weird shit the yankee aftermarket ECUs do. Made me think of Kinks R34...
    • I do this, I also don't get the joke  
    • Return flow cooler will be killing you I reckon. You can certainly push more through a low mount setup but they're good numbers for a stock looking engine bay.  Mine made 345rwkw (hub) at 22psi on 98 with a "highflow" on a stock manifold but it's a long way from a normal high flow or standard engine. I used one of those Turbosmart IWG-75's and it was great with the Motec running closed loop boost with pressure being applied to both sides of the diaphragm. 
    • Hey man do you have pic of adaptor plate by any chance I need to match up the bolt holes as my gearbox adaptor plate ones are way off the only bolts of starter motor are matching thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...