Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a standard R32 basically just a air intake, fuel pump and manual boost controller. I'm running it at 12 psi but it seems to drop boost from 12 pretty quickly at higher revs. I was told a digital boost controller would make a pretty big difference. Any thoughts out there?

the pressure will vary and taper off most likely due to an exhaust restriction. you should get a 3" turbo back exhaust system, this will free up the backpressure and also give you some more power everywhere as it will allow the engine to breathe easier. a digital boost controller will also help the boost taper off a little, but it will only try so much, if the physical exhaust system doesn't allow then it simply wont allow it

dude got the same prob with my 32 running same boost, my mechanic told me its the stock 32 turbo, and when i put something bigger on it will hold boost till redline better, i have a full 3" zorst from the turbo back..

i have a ebc that holds boost at 3800 and 4800 fine, but once u go over 5 or 55 as u accelerate up the boost fades off say from like 13 to 11.5 or so

so relax dude from what im told that shiz is normal.

but hey my mechanic could be a blowass and we might both have a problem :P

im waiting till i put my new turbo on and see what happens.

If you do what Paulr33 suggested you should get boost to hold untill round 6-6.5k but after you will get a fair drop in boost.

The stock RB20 Turbo tends to run out of puff after that.

Edited by RedDrifter

its always goin to happen with a manual boost controller it is just 1 of the cons of hvin 1 an electronic boost controller will help cause they adjust themself to keep boost constant but it would also be ur turbo the rb20 turbos r pretty small i am just about to upgrade mine to an rb25 hi flow

Thanks for all your help guys that is much appreciated. I will get the 3 inch and thats the only real way to find out. I do plan on getting the R33 turbo on shortly. Gor about $600 you can't go wrong.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...