Jump to content
SAU Community

Hunter Valley Lunch Run, 29/03 (at last a date!)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 244
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

oh bum... no putty road... I thought I had everyone convinced... hm I might go up the putty road and then drive back to gosford... 8:30 is a bit late for me anyway. let me think it over.

Ronin,

Can we have a list of those that are coming please?

Cheers,

Dan.

Attendees:

RONIN

MzSupra007 (plates: MZ007)

ed (maybe)

UR2EZ

Moanie

Carlo

BY BY (maybe)

Duncan

XXE-R32

Franks

bigvis

Oz GTR97V (maybe)

GTR-80Y (maybe)

croat

brendanf

dishgirl

Don91E (maybe)

Jimbo

Majanal

QIK78U

Airzone

swifty

jtir (maybe)

MissS13

Grim

MrR33

Endorean

kil41t

skylark

Lozza150

Drivebai

hotino

Merli

Tex (maybe)

Kinks (maybe)

Benm (maybe)

Sura

red900ss

XterC

there will be 2 or 3 others that are not from SAU that may come along.

Looking good :D

Yep I'm going to the Hunter but I don't know whether I will cruise with you all - is the meet point in the valley Cessnock Maccas? (What happened to the days when PUBS were used as landmarks and meeting places.)

Thought I might head to the Mount View region first - some of my favs are here...................

then slowly cruise through some of the boutique cellars in the Cessnock area................

next - attempt the odd "sellect" door in the Lovedale/North Rothbury district before heading to Branxton for a few cleansing ales and a bed for the night...............

That leaves Sunday for a leisurely wander around Pokolbin - out to Broke (which I will be by then) and the spendour of the Putty road with minimal traffic and (hopefully) the same amount of blue checked 5hitboxes.

Will be on 33




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...