Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Question, is that with the bottle, or without it?

without

i think it comes on about 3300 with nos and full at 4300 or so

when i get the ecu back

ill post two dyno sheets

one without nos and one with to compare

Edited by MR331307
i own the one ur building, hurry up and finish it! :starwars:

ahhahahahhaahhahahahaha

yes i better anounce this

i borrowed my mates plates SCRMER

my plates are LNEMUP

im building his car

it has a Trust t88

Forged pistons,rods,crank,jun pump,Larger oil sump,GTR head,LARGE CAMS,custom cooler,Hydra ECU,1000cc injectors.

will be ready in 2 weeks

R31Nismoid

where you located

i will be traveling to heathcote one day over the next few months

maybe you can come to view the car

Vic, about 1.5hours from heathcote.

But lemme know if you do head down there, and if im free ill come for a cruise.

Might even have my car back for some drag workout :starwars:

hey jason good work mate, ya always get people having a go at whatever you try, but thats life :)

u shut alot of people up runnin a 10 and now u just gotta shut the rest up with a 9 haha :)

good luck in the hunt for 9's :)

Thanks mate

if i can organise an auto or dog box

i will gain .7 of a second

to start with from what we calculated in time losing while changing gears

then a little more power and harder launch should run a 9

well what im aiming for anyway

ahhahahahhaahhahahahaha

yes i better anounce this

i borrowed my mates plates SCRMER

my plates are LNEMUP

im building his car

it has a Trust t88

Forged pistons,rods,crank,jun pump,Larger oil sump,GTR head,LARGE CAMS,custom cooler,Hydra ECU,1000cc injectors.

will be ready in 2 weeks

2 weeks he says! i have witnesses now :)

compressor surge is caused when your cylinder head cant flow what is being pushed through it. camshafts are your answer. GT35/40 are rated for 700hp.

Just a quick question, you say you have a gt3540 - just wondering what specs as mine has the 0.82 rear and is making 480rwhp with slight compressor surge (meaning the turbo has run out of flow) and 24psi, mine also sees full boost early 4000rpms - just after a comparison with when yours sees full boost as im assuming you have a 1.06 exhaust

And congrats on the power and qtr time

Thanks mate

if i can organise an auto or dog box

i will gain .7 of a second

to start with from what we calculated in time losing while changing gears

then a little more power and harder launch should run a 9

well what im aiming for anyway

Does that mean you think 10.8 is as fast as it is going to go with the standard gearbox?

:P cheers :)

Does that mean you think 10.8 is as fast as it is going to go with the standard gearbox?

:P cheers :)

i think that is

if i flat change i think it will blow in the first couple runs

i am trying to find a dog box if any 1 has 1 for sale.

I was of the impression compressor surge meant the turbo had run out of flow capacity, GCG apperantly do an anti surge front cover which has small holes to help with flow. I am thinking of doing this and 66mm front wheel if it won't make it noticeably laggier

according to garrett's site compress surge occurs when the pressure past the compressor outlet is greater than the pressure the compressor wheel can supply, ie the compressor map dictates that it can supply 12psi compression in the ideal scenario in the compressor island, but for some reason the pressure past the outlet, in intercooler/manifold pipework is above that 12psi level

I was of the impression compressor surge meant the turbo had run out of flow capacity, GCG apperantly do an anti surge front cover which has small holes to help with flow. I am thinking of doing this and 66mm front wheel if it won't make it noticeably laggier

They are bypass holes, they don't increase the maximum flow capacity of the compressor. They are used to prevent the problem that paulr33 explained in the previous post.

:) cheers :P

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...