Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

cant believe ir just read 13 pages of all this

1.4 sixty foot and 129 mph and only a 10.8

you need to changes gears faster that thing will go 10.1 with ease.

or get an auto.

good work i like it.

our cars would be a good match up.

Yeah love to champ

Reason why i didnt flat change is the scared to blow the box and thats useless money

I have just finished putting the auto in and have driven the car but have noticed i have only got around 4-5 psi of boost

I am going to check this problem out and Do a comparence dyno printout from Manual To auto.

The box i am running is a 2 speed powerglide with transbrake.TCT Converter With a mech Diode

I have also got a Chrome moly 1 piece tailshaft made to help with the transfer

I will post tomorrow the difference and will be back at the track in 2 weeks

My next aim is to run in the 9 second area.If it cannot be done with the standard head which i think is possible with some Nitrous but if not i will use the Solid lifter head which i have got with a steel head gasket.And that also goes if the head gasket goes i will also change heads.

Edited by MR331307
I cant believe that rb25 is still going. I hope my rb30det can make 400rwhp in stock form and be reliable!!! if that rb25 can do then mine can get close to it im sure :cheers:

Hey Guilt-Toy, I have an internally stock (apart from poncams) rb25 making 410.7rwhp and it is running fine. It is on a conservative tune with timing advance and a/f ratios to keep it running as long as possible. But then again others running less have had the motor pop. I guess a lot has to do with the tuning and the condition of the internals to begin with.

Cheers,

JB

Ok have run the box in a bit on the dyno and have done 4 power runs

Without modifying the tune i have made 477 WRHP with the auto on just 18 psi Boost

Before the auto i was making on average 500 RWHP on 18 psi of boost on pump fuel

I will post the nitrous compared sheet next week when im back from Newcastle as well as this sheet

But as far as what i can see i only lost 23 RWHP

I also tried to spool it on the brake and found it couldnt get more then 3 psi

I tried with the nitrous and it flared straight away

This is due to the converter being a Transbrake Nos setup converter

The converter Was built by John @ TCT in melbourne which i think did a unreal job and the box was built by Joe @ Wollongong Automatics.

I should be back at the track in 2 weeks now

Waiting on the car to be teched.

My aim is to run in the 9 second area and further till something gives way.If something does i will change motors and try eventually to run into the lower 9 area.

Any questions just ask

Edited by MR331307
1200hp would be good for 8's or 7's wouldn't it? whens the beast arrive?

Im using this engine in my Full chassis car that my father and i am building

Im using the other engine i have in this one

the one with the solid head ETC

i do

but i am not allowed to Show the Setup

(FAMILLLLYYYY MATTERS)

when its closer to being @ the Track ill post some photos of it and the car

This is what is in the Motor im putting in this Car

-RB26 Crank

-N1 oil Pump

-EAGLE H beam Rods

-ACL forged Pistons

-ARP main & head Stud kits

-Cometic Head Gasket

-RB25 Head with TOMMIE Valve Springs,Solid Lifters,Tommie 272 @ 11.5 lift Cams

Aiming For 600 RWHP+++ and a low 9

Edited by MR331307

hey bro, look ive just spent the good part of 2 1/2 hours reading this thread and its my bloody birthday, ive even held of on the cake till i read this, lol. What a thread, one of the best of read on this site. To the doubters out there, well you said he was dreaming and the dream came alive. The power you got out of the engine was pheonaminal, it makes ya think what a 13 odd year old engine can actually achieve. To the believers, aim high and you can go far. I know that the availability of a dyno and the mind of someone like your self (mechanicaly) not everyone has, but you took advantage of it and done well. That engine had a lot of balls. Anyway good luck with the new one and who knows what power you'll hit with this one.

Damo

hey bro, look ive just spent the good part of 2 1/2 hours reading this thread and its my bloody birthday, ive even held of on the cake till i read this, lol. What a thread, one of the best of read on this site. To the doubters out there, well you said he was dreaming and the dream came alive. The power you got out of the engine was pheonaminal, it makes ya think what a 13 odd year old engine can actually achieve. To the believers, aim high and you can go far. I know that the availability of a dyno and the mind of someone like your self (mechanicaly) not everyone has, but you took advantage of it and done well. That engine had a lot of balls. Anyway good luck with the new one and who knows what power you'll hit with this one.

Damo

LOL HAPPY BIRTHDAY BRO

Anyways ill post some picts of the Internals

If i wasnt Selfish and didnt try to get more power out of it i would say it would of Lasted alot longer but i was always Trying to make more instead of leaving it

Anyways

Shouldnt be to long

Cheers mate, but also in saying that you were selfish, you also did something that im pretty sure a lot of people have always wanted to do but have never had the balls or money to do, run the bitch as hard as it could do and not care about the consiquences, i think a lot of poeple will actually understand that the more you look after the car, the more power can be put into it. In saying that, within reason ha ha.

Damo

After all the Motor Has been through i can say that it is possible to Make 470 RWHP safely on a Street RB25 Standard motor and make it last on Pump Fuel.

To make even more Safer power i recommend Changing the Head Gasket to a Tommie or Cometic and Upgrading Cams in which you wont have to Run as much Ignition Timing and Boost.As for the Bottom end i think that all of it can last.

The main Reasons for the Car making the power is

1) suffiecent intercooler (this is what Makes your Power And makes the Engine last Due to A stable Low Air Temp)

2) the Design Inside the Plenium

3)A Efficent Turbo (there is no need to Get a 1000 hp turbo if all your looking at is 600 engine HP)

4) Great Ignition Setup which is pretty basic and can get even better like the Next setup im doing which runs 6 coils

5) A good ECU

6)Reducing Load Off the Engine EG Clutch fan

7) good Fuel Supply

well done mate its lasted alot longer than the knockers on here had imagined. bout time someone showed em they are keyboard mechanics and dont actually know from there own experience, just from "i heard ..." and "i reckon ..." comments said on forums.

good luck with the new setup

well done mate its lasted alot longer than the knockers on here had imagined. bout time someone showed em they are keyboard mechanics and dont actually know from there own experience, just from "i heard ..." and "i reckon ..." comments said on forums.

good luck with the new setup

Thanks Mate

I havent commented yet and thats becoz I know f**kall about what destroys a good motor at that amount of power, but its interesting to note that it was No6 that lost compession, as that piston seems to be the one that cops it alot, higher temps and first to lean out, have you accounted for this in the new setup?

And Oh well done I would be happy to have your dyno hours :(

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...