Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What does it take for an r33 gtr to run mid-high 12's all day everyday?and reliably as well, is that a bit much to ask, or easily do-able?, im still deciding on the whole r33 gts-t mod it up, or just buy an r33 "r"

thanks

Very easy to do a low 12 in a 33 R, I did 12.3@110 mph in a friends 33 . The only mods were: Power f/c,

cat back exhaust, front pipes and ebc ( 1 bar boost ) .

The only risky thing in them are the ceramic turbos, if they let go ( just a matter of when, not if) they usualy take the engine with them ...

Plenty of 33's for sale in australia starting at around $29 k .

thanks heaps ppl, i think i mite just go with the "r" like ive always wanted to:), umm the risky issue?why so, is it cause your running too much boost on the stock ceramics???, i wouldve though an exhaust/pod and tune would only benefit the car, with no real disadvantages??

thanks heaps ppl, i think i mite just go with the "r" like ive always wanted to:), umm the risky issue?why so, is it cause your running too much boost on the stock ceramics???, i wouldve though an exhaust/pod and tune would only benefit the car, with no real disadvantages??

Yes but @ 1bar the turbos are at their limit.

So like it was said it will only be a matter of when not if.

I ran my car with stock engine/turbos, 1 bar boost/exaust, stock ecu which ran 12.4's easy, I drove it everyday as a daily driver, no problems for 40,000ks :P

A bit hard to believe you when you're selling the turbos in your signature :lol:

A bit hard to believe you when you're selling the turbos in your signature :lol:

I rebuilt my engine because the ringlands were stuffed (which is only because a certain workshop stuffed something up and detonated my engine to death).. and i figured why not upgrade to GTSS turbos at the same time, so my turbos for sale are still in good cond :happy:

I rebuilt my engine because the ringlands were stuffed (which is only because a certain workshop stuffed something up and detonated my engine to death).. and i figured why not upgrade to GTSS turbos at the same time, so my turbos for sale are still in good cond :happy:

How's the GTSS turbos compared to the N1, 2530 and 2540's?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...