Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just a quick hi from another new person.

Just a quick bit of about myself, live in boring maryborough in qld (its near hervey bay). Just about to buy an r33.

Its a 95 r33, black, 87 000km. Pretty stock apart from a hks cat back exhaust, lowered and 17's. I think its a type M too with the taller wing and different front bar.

Hopefully its quick enough, comfortable and reliable. Thats all im after after the last bloody car, modified tx5 turbo, nearly as quick as the stock r33, but bloody unreliable and no working aircon.

Thats about all of my story anyway,

Tim.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/107974-another-noob/
Share on other sites

Yeah i wasn't overly set on a skyline, but seem like a pretty sensible choice. Not much more weight than an s14 (the most likely other car), yet more power, better brakes and gearbox.

Insurance was pretty cheap for me too (1k fully comprehensive/year).

Ill prolly keep it pretty much as is and near stock. Maybe a front mount. Dont really need crazy power.

Found some pics on the net, but they are pretty rough as it came off the boat a couple weeks ago. Might have to go some more once i get it I reckon. Looks a fair load better now.

Linky

Apparently someone here works for that dealer anyway.

Just hope it doesnt cost me too much in shit breaking anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/107974-another-noob/#findComment-1991680
Share on other sites

Just a quick hi from another new person.

Just a quick bit of about myself, live in boring maryborough in qld (its near hervey bay). Just about to buy an r33.

Its a 95 r33, black, 87 000km. Pretty stock apart from a hks cat back exhaust, lowered and 17's. I think its a type M too with the taller wing and different front bar.

Hopefully its quick enough, comfortable and reliable. Thats all im after after the last bloody car, modified tx5 turbo, nearly as quick as the stock r33, but bloody unreliable and no working aircon.

Thats about all of my story anyway,

Tim.

Congrats on choosing an R33 and welcome to the club.

AFAIK all R33 GTS25Ts were 'Type M', the front bar is part of a factory aero package which many refer to as an 'M-spec' front bar and the 'taller wing' is a Series 2 wing which is often found on Series "1.5" 1995 models as well.

LeonR34 is the guy you're thinking of, he works at Brad Bottcher.

Let me know what they're like as I've had my eyes on a few R33 GTSTs that they are selling.

Did you have a good look at any of the other R33s that they're selling? If you did could you please tell me what you thought of them? Cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/107974-another-noob/#findComment-1991886
Share on other sites

Cogs, not all R33 GTST's were type M's. So not all have the Type M front bar.

Oh there are enough here in pieces etc to sell the parts cheap but its not the norm, and go to Nissan for new parts and be prepared to hold onto to something when they tell you the cost. Then there is the fuel issuse, they like to drink.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/107974-another-noob/#findComment-1991896
Share on other sites

Cogs, not all R33 GTST's were type M's. So not all have the Type M front bar.

You seem pretty sure but I always thought it was understood that in the R33 range, all turbo models (series 1 and 2) were all type-m.

The bodykits which people often refer to as 'M-spec' (or type-M) are actually just factory options.

Could someone please clear this up for me? :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/107974-another-noob/#findComment-1991922
Share on other sites

THanks for the comments guys.

Yeah I let you know how it goes with the car (by pm of course). So far they have been good, tidying up most little things that werent perfect.

PM me with the cars in question if you want. They are only 2km or so from my home.

Dont worry, im used to expensive factory parts owning a telstar tx5 turbo, some of the stuff i have had to buy over the gears is just ridiculous. $350 for engine mounts etc., $450 for strut tops, the list goes on.

Fuel isn't a huge deal, i only live about 700m from work.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/107974-another-noob/#findComment-1992123
Share on other sites

You seem pretty sure but I always thought it was understood that in the R33 range, all turbo models (series 1 and 2) were all type-m.

The bodykits which people often refer to as 'M-spec' (or type-M) are actually just factory options.

Could someone please clear this up for me? :P

No not all of the 33's were type M's. My friend had a 95 model that was just a gts25t not a type m. There is no such thing as an m spec on a 33 only mspec available is on the gtr 34.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/107974-another-noob/#findComment-1993579
Share on other sites

Just hope you dont have to buy parts for it, kind of expensive to buy!

Sorry, but I think its statement is garbage.

There is massive support throughout Australia for both new and used Skyline parts.

I had a 1996 series 2 GTS-T, and that was great on fuel, in fact I got 600 km's to a tank on freeway driving and my car had identical mods to Turbo Tim's - so I cant say that I agree with your comments about fuel consumption either. If the car were significantly modified, thats a different story.

Turbo Tim's car looks like a typical series 1.5 R33, nothing more.

Regardless, welcome to SAU and the world of Skyline ownership Tim :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/107974-another-noob/#findComment-1993728
Share on other sites

Yeah i reckon driving style with have a lot to do with it (in regard to both parts and fuel). I found the same in my old cars, it would break stuff on a weekly basis if I drove it hard, but once i got over that it was fine, and would get as low as 7l/100km on the highway when a lot of people cant break below 10 with the same car.

Yeah mines a typical s1.5 r33, i dont really want anything more though. Don't need anything ridiculous quick or attention grabbing so it suits me just fine. Maybe a front mount and a little more boost, but that will be all thats for sure. I would have like a s2, but seems like a fair step up from the 14.5 i am spending now. Especially considering im not hugely sold on a skyling anyway. It will probably just be an in between car anyway.

Sorry about the long and rambling post :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/107974-another-noob/#findComment-1994124
Share on other sites

I had a 1996 series 2 GTS-T, and that was great on fuel, in fact I got 600 km's to a tank on freeway driving

mate you're the exception to the rule then

i dont know too many skylines that would return that sort of economy

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/107974-another-noob/#findComment-1994410
Share on other sites

You seem pretty sure but I always thought it was understood that in the R33 range, all turbo models (series 1 and 2) were all type-m.

The bodykits which people often refer to as 'M-spec' (or type-M) are actually just factory options.

Could someone please clear this up for me? >_<

series two are an M spec in the R32 and R33

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/107974-another-noob/#findComment-1995478
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...