Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i have a a r34 rb26 in need of a rebuild and need help!!

the car it is in is a ex D1GP car and is obviously used for drift.

it has run a bearing (1 or more) possibly due to oil surge

anyway it is now due for a rebuild, we were atleast going to go

pistons, rings, rods, n1 oil pump, trust extension kit, is highly likely we will need a new crank

as we realised what was happening quite late ( can't hear anything over the 3 fuel pumps)

we were going to go with the first stage hks 2.8l kit but evidently the block wouldn't like it

and we would need an N1 item, so that scraps that idea also we were told that we may aswell

throw the engne away as bits of bearing would be scattered throughtout the engine (i thought a good flush and tidy up/porting would be sweat!)

any way what options do i have with the crank, scatered metal in the engine, etc.

ps we are looking for around 600-700hp rear wheels (we have all the externals to handle that and more!)

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/110005-r34-rb26-rebuild-time-drift-spec/
Share on other sites

yeah 450-500kw drifter

it is nuts already but hey can never have enough and since it needs a rebuild anyway

it did a team event with kuroi at an option 2 event in 2004 i think,

anyway, do i need a n1 block for 450-500kw? with a stage 1 hks 2.8l kit?

what are my other options with the crank what is good out there and what $$

any of you guys that has had an rb26 expire in the same way have any problems

with debris through the engine?

ohh and yes it is a four door

cheers guys

might even post a pic of one of the laps before it let go

yeah 450-500kw drifter

it is nuts already but hey can never have enough and since it needs a rebuild anyway

it did a team event with kuroi at an option 2 event in 2004 i think,

anyway, do i need a n1 block for 450-500kw? with a stage 1 hks 2.8l kit?

what are my other options with the crank what is good out there and what $$

any of you guys that has had an rb26 expire in the same way have any problems

with debris through the engine?

ohh and yes it is a four door

cheers guys

might even post a pic of one of the laps before it let go

u got jun 2.7L billet, full counterweight crank, tomei 2.8L (not full counterwieght i dont think) and the hks 2.8L crank, though there a few different hks cranks in the 2.8L depending on power. and n1 block is only 3K i was told which if i knew when i did mine id be using one str8 up, not worth risking on a normal block when they are sooo cheap :down: plenty of options around, try searching the site for stroker kits as their was a large thread on it a fair while ago now discussing all the options :(

show us some pics :( is it a skyline or a chaser going by the jzx (rb26 powered) as your listed car?

at the time it blew it had 334kw rear wheels and 1100nm of torque but that was detuned running pump gas.

the head has all the bits (may be looking at new cams if debris got up there though).

Was told that the r34 block was basically similar to the n1 in design ( with extra ribing for greater torsional strength stopping cracking in the block at hi rpm) , would be going for the first stage

2.8l kit the second and third is a bit overthe top

yeah its a mark 2 toyota powered by a r34 rb26

post-27431-1142630382.jpg

350rwkw is a much smarter, cheap and more reliable approach than 500rwkw.

plus drifting is more about car setup than power.

personally stick under the 400rwkw marker, far better response and throttle control can be achieved. And thats what you need correct?

yeah decided 500kw is a bit over the top but would like 400kw, the power hits in an awkward time for me anyway and was going with the stage one 2.8 kit (highest compression version) to move the torque down in the range a little bit with a bit of response (would this be the case?)

as for the power in drifters issue have you seen kuroi's 900ps onevia powered by rb26, but yeah i do agree

does any one know if the r34 block is similar to the n1 in design ( with extra ribing for greater torsional strength stopping cracking in the block at hi rpm)?

btw the track is in NZ pukekohe infact (mega entry speeds into that sweeper!)

my work brought in a 33 gtst x Garage Aqua track car from Japan with r34 n1 crank, rods and oversized pistons stroked the 25 to a 2.7lt its fitted with a RX6 made 355rwkw on flat out mode i.e 1.8 bar

Its super responsive span the semi slicks up in third without any problems on 1.2 bar.

the guy that bought it drifts it on 1 to 1.2 bar so just on 280 - 300rwkw plenty of power

R34GTR (RB26DETT) block measures up exactly the same as an R32GTR N1 block. Personally I think the N1 block is under utilised in a 450 rwkw application, a standard block will handle that easily.

My 20 cents…….

Dismantle the R34GTR RB26DETT, clean it up and work out exactly what it is that you need to replace. Then get on with the rebuild stick a standard crank, some good rods, bearings and pistons in it and control the oil temperature and flow properly. It will handle the power you want easily and with a decently ported cylinder head and 9 to 1 compression ratio it will have all the response you need. Ceramic coat the piston crowns, the combustion chambers and the exhaust ports for the superior temperature control and a further improvement in response.

:P cheers :)

thanks Sydneykid, i thought the 34 block was similar and could handle over what we wanted, will

look into your suggestions engines in the process of coming out at the mo.

one of the strong reasons we were looking at the hks kit is that it would only be alittle more (not much at all) to get it than get all the bits and a good stock crank :P

(over here anyway)

still cant belive it had oil surge after competeing in d1gp and other japanese events

only thing i can think of is they ran it over full?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...