Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've just purchased a cast for my RB25DET in a 180SX setup. (not on the road yet)

The manifold is designed for IHI/Apexi Turbo's and a Greddy Type R External style wastegate.

I have a GCG Garrett GT30/40R (.63AR) Turbo, and a Tial 38/40 External Wastegate though, and need some assistance with adaptor flanges.

Can anyone advise where i could buy such adaptors?

Is it likely that i'll have to buy a 38mm tial adaptor, and a (??mm) Greddy Type R Adaptor and have them welded together to make it join up?

Thanks.

Edited by silman
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/110007-exhaust-manifold-adaptor-flanges/
Share on other sites

In a nut shell yes. Though you can get your exhaust shop to make up custom flanges for you to if your in a bind and cant find any off the shelf

As the manifold is cast it isn't as easy as lopping off the flange and welding on a new one.

It does look like the wastegate flange already has an adapter on it as well which you should probably remove to tidy the whole thing up a bit.

Where you will benefit though is by having the adapter you can cutsom make it to fit the wastegate pretty much where ever you want to mount it.

And atleast you know the manifold won't crack.

most tials come with flanges when you get them, an exhaust shop can get a laser cut flange done custom pretty easy (for the manifold end of the wastegate feed - had to do that for exhaust flange on my turbo) then weld up a pipe to position the wastegate lower in the engine bay.. to keep some of the heat away from other gear

prob quicker and easier to just get them to do the mod on the turbo feed too.

i would have thought a genunie apexi one would have been better designed than that

Are you really in the moderators group?

what's so wrong about this manifold?

keep in mind the flange sits back to keep the centre of gravity towards the middle of the car. The wastegate points straight down to avoid heat issues. What exactly is so bad about it?

yeah i am in the moderators group, how come?

nah sorry i should have re-said what i meant

i expected tuned lenght tubular style instead of log style

no real reason why, i just expected that i guess

to brutally honest, your first reply was not helpfull, and didn't answer any of the questions i asked and either has your second. I'd expect more from a moderator.

thanks to the rest who replied, i'm going to look at selling the tial and purchasing an hks w'gate.

As for the turbo, i rang gcg today to ask if they have any experience with using an apexi/ihi turbine housing on any of there gt range turbo's to which the answer was no. Will have a custom flange built up to retain the current turbine housing i have.

right and so because im a moderator im expected to instantly answer everyone's questions?

i dont think thats the case at all. its an open discussion forum for exactly that, an open discussion. i never said the product was good or bad, i just commented on it. sure it didnt help. it's not like this place is an online helpdesk system, its an online discussion board.

sorry if you were given the wrong impression.

just noticed that this manifold would fit both RB26 and RB25 ..

wouldn't see it as being as efficient as a tube style, and the wastegate feed is in an opposite direction to the gas flow..

but still would beat any modified std log manifold with external gate flange welded on.

interested to see how much room you have for the dump pipe too, with the turbo sitting so far back, will be tight to the firewall in a sylvia/180 i would think.

check your prices for HKS wg's too, very pricey, might be cheaper to get the flange made than swap to HKS unit. dont go the cheap copy, they suck balls

Yep, also fits RB20. I agree it wouldn't be as efficient, but i weighed that up against not having to worry about a cracking manifold. The dump pipe will be a very tight fit indeed. I buy everything from Greenline. Yes definitely wouldn't risk my setup on a cheapy hks copy.

I didn't comment on the turbo inlet flange before, but it looks to be common t3 sized so you shouldn't have an issue.

You can always wander into gcg or garrett with the manifold and ask to trial fit a t3 flanged turbo.

check the centre to centre spacing of the studs, T3 is 86mm/43.5mm (long/short side), T2 is 73/38.5.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...