Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nah, that'll be classified as in the Skyline GTR section and your about 38seconds off the pace of Kamikaze, sorry

hey, he only beat my r31 gtsr time by 4 secs, give him some credit lol

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

You can also cheat majorly if you run the car straight over the grass just before the second last corner...and also if you full throttle and hug the wall around the Karoussel you get a faster launch out of the corner. None of my laps involve this, really!

Kamikaze I cannot stop watching that video in your sig, its preiceless >_<

  • 4 weeks later...

Wow, some really quick times in this thread!

Gave Nurburgring a crack the last couple of days - Heres my time with the only car i've really tested on the track:

-Modified R34 GT-R M-Spec Nur

-Racing Soft Tyres

-No Wings

-No NOS

-Really stiff suspension (72mm off the ground) and no traction control! = lots of fun :P

Time: 6:21.522

Steve.

Here it is, post your nurburgring lap times. I have also created sub categories for the fastest lap times

Heres a link to the old Nurb Laptimes Thread

Happy racing :D

Skyline GTR times

R31 GTSR - 7m06.509sec [KamikazeR33]

R32 GTR (N1) - 6m33.245secs [Topaz]

R33 GTR (Nismo LM) - 6m36.225sec [KamikazeR33]

R34 GTR (Carbon R) - 6m23.172sec [KamikazeR33]

R34 LM RACE CAR - 5m46.881sec [Topaz]

F1 car times

5m30.998secs [Topaz]

5m37.218secs [KamikazeR33]

Race car times

Nissan R92CP Race Car '92 - 5m09.446sec [v_twin]

Jaguar XJR9 Race Car '88- 5m29.043sec [Topaz]

Toyota TS020 - 5m36.533sec [KamikazeR33]

Peugeot 905 Race Car - 5m45.478sec [WHENNY19]

Audi R8 Race Car - 5m51.105sec [KamikazeR33]

Mitsubishi FTO Super Touring Car - 6m14.696sec [Topaz]

Auto Union V16 Type C Streamline - 6m57.772sec [Topaz]

Falken R34 GTR Race Car - 6m59.866sec [KamikazeR33]

Modified road car times

Unmodified car times

VW W12 Nardo Concept - 7m13.066sec [Topaz]

R34 GTR - 8m03.316sec [AzzurrA]

R33 GTR Vspec '97 - 8m37.421sec [Freddy Kruger]

R32 GTR Vspec '93 - 8m46.039sec [Freddy Kruger]

I have done a 05.07.989 with a Nissan R89C Racecar 89... hehe..

post-29787-1150186013.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...