Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

PRICE DROP TO 10.5K FIRM

Must sell this weekend

Hi all,

Have a R32 gtst with rb25 for sale, exact list of mods will be coming soon but its fresh from japan and has no compliance, but can be complied. Its perfect for those looking for a track car, i'm yet to go over the car but from a quick drive the engine sounds good its got adjustable susp. and mech. lsd also has numerous gauges and controllers floating in the car.

$11,900 ono

Those interested can see the car 039574 7868 and ask for Ray.

IMG_0116.jpg

IMG_0113.jpg

IMG_0111.jpg

IMG_0119.jpg

Edited by N1RAY
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/112807-fs-r32-rb25det-price-drop-105k-firm/
Share on other sites

The car is in Clayton, VIC and it was a 15y import but yet to be complied. Has another quick look under the car and found:

Nismo suspension

adjustable castor rods

Splitfire coils

feels like a HD clutch.

New Price $11,000

Not sure what you mean?

It doesnt have to be complied if you dont want to.

Cheers

Ray

Was it brought in under the 15 year old rule????

If not, it has to be complied within 12 months or it will be crushed!

I am asking because I want a track car only and don't want the hassell of having to comply and register it.

RB25 box? or just engine swap? K's on engine? power output? compression? nismo suspension asin adj coil overs ride height/damper? hook me sum pics and as much details as u know more specific about wat bits are on the car as im very interested!!

Edited by shy_s6
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

the price on carsales has now gone up to $9,990 but it is still more expensive on here....

POO TO YOU MATE thats not at all nice to the SAU community considering most of the skyliners know this site.....

i think you will find it nearly impossible to LEGALLY comply this car due to the engine conversion

you have been found out buddy

also seeing as you joined on the 8th, and straight away advertised this car without any other insterest in this community other than to make a quick buck goes to show how much of a person you are

DOOSCHESBAGS LIKE YOU NEED TO BE BENT OVER, KICKED IN THE ASS AND SENT ON YOUR WAY :cool:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...