Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi, I am a bit confused here (nothing new, no cheap shots please unless you really feel you have to).

I have heard alot of 'if you are running stock pistons, you cant turn the boost up over xxxpsi (usually about 14psi), because you will put holes in the pistons'?

I was under the impression that damage to pistons was usually due to detonation which 'may' be caused by excessive boost.

How can boost pressure (eg 14 psi is safe, 15psi and you will have a hole in your piston) be true. It just doesnt seem to add up.

WHAT AM I MISSING?

I would be interested to hear comments for and against, anyone had experience running over 1 bar boost with stock pistons?

Thanks for any input.

Steve

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11547-boost-and-piston-damage/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You are right Steve, detonation is what wrecks pistons. Usually it breaks the ring lands or sometimes even the top ring.

Detonation is when the combustion process turns into an instantaneous explosion. The idea is that the combustion process creates a steady increase in pressure which smoothly pushes down the piston.

There will be a critical combination of temperature and pressure where the mixture spontaneously explodes. This is the dreaded tink tink shock wave created by detonation.

High octane fuels can stand more heat and pressure before they spontaneously explode.

Excessive combustion chamber temperatures due to lean mixtures, or too high a compression ratio will do it as well as excessive boost pressures, or excessive ignition advance.

There is a combination of factors, not just one factor. You cannot say that a certain engine will detonate with 10:1 compression, and not detonate with 9.8:1. Or that 14psi boost is o/k and 15psi is not. Or a certain particular weak air fuel ratio will detonate at full load.

It is the combination that counts. If you have detonation you are going to have to change something to get rid of it. What is easiest or best to change depends on what you have.

Usually there is something wrong with the engine tuning, and a proper dyno tune by an expert can put things right. But the higher boost you run, the less margin for error there is.

Also remember that the fuel you buy may not always be up to the advertised octane standard it is supposed to be. So a bad load of fuel can destroy your engine if it is tuned right up to the detonation limit on best quality fuel.

Good answer Warpspeed, I would only add that we have run up to 1.7 bar with standard pistons without issue on a properly tuned engine. I have seen improperly tuned engines crush the ring lands at 0.7 bar. It is more about tuning, that boost.

Hope that helps

Yeah, I agree with what is being siad, high boost will not the piston damage. I think most people say high boost cause if your car does start to detonate, which is more likely at high boost, then you will wreck the pistons.

Full aftermarket management is the only way to go for boost higher than 14psi, cause then it can compensate for air temp etc, to prevent detonation in any situation.

See'ya:burnout:

Thanks for all the replies,

Clears things up nicely, and somewhat of a relief, as I was intending on going over 1 bar, with everything else sorted of course:)

Cheers

Steve

GTS-t VPEC, have you been watching a star wars vids of late?

'high boost will not the piston damage'...j/k

Originally posted by Steve

How can boost pressure (eg 14 psi is safe, 15psi and you will have a hole in your piston) be true.  It just doesnt seem to add up.

Your sources might be confused with the max recommended

boost (14psi) with the standard turbo?

chinese whispering is rampant amongst the import world :(

yer detonation has a million variables, u cant say all engines will detonate on a certain CR or boost level. Things like quench distance of the engine (if it has a quench head at all), the cr and boost levels, the quality of the casting (if u have say little spurs sticking out of ur combustion chamber, they tend to induce detonation) and a million other things all go towards it.

Things uve gotta watch out with stock pistons are rpm levels (depending on wether the stock RB pistons is cast, hyper or forgie?) and detonation. There the main killers.

Hi GTS-t VSPEC, we have used Arias pistons a lot, good product no problems, although we use Total Seal rings not the ones supplied by Arias with the pistons. Haven't used their rods, don't know if they make them themselves or buy them in. There is a bit of this going on in the US at the moment, piston guys selling rods and rod guys selling pistons.

Competition makes the prices cheap.

Well Steve, I certainly do not claim to be an expert, but my beginners understanding of the stresses on engine parts are as follows.

Maximum pressure loading on the piston will occur at around 20 degrees ATDC on the power stroke. It should rise to a smooth hump peak around this point. Thermal loading depends on all sorts of things, but if the engine tuning is correct there should be no hot spots, and the piston crown temperature should not be high enough to cause pre ignition or lower the structural strength of the piston material. Detonation is really the only way you are ever likely to kill a piston, assuming it was installed and clearanced properly.

Conrods really only have two problems. Firstly the tensile (pulling apart) stress at TDC on the exhaust stroke is the highest stress the rod will see. This depends on piston weight and RPM. The cyclic tension and compression can eventually fatigue the rod to the point where fatigue cracks can begin. That is the reason they polish rods to help to eliminate surface imperfections where cracks can begin.

The second problem is that the same tensile stress can stretch the big end bolts and cap out of shape. This can lead to bolt failure, or lubrication problems where the big end bearing can spin or burn. As the big end stretches, the sides pull inward and squeegee all the oil off the journal. This is RPM related as well.

You only really require special rods if you are planning an increase of RPM well above stock. On a road car a piston speed of 4000 FPM should be the redline with steel rods. For drag racing, or where the engine will be regularly inspected and rebuilt, 4400 FPM might be as high as you would want to go.

A large power increase, using stock RPM levels does not require special rods unless the original stock rods are rubbish, or boost levels are truly extreme. Usually the rod bolts are the weakest part of stock rods.

Crankshaft bearings should not present any real problems, provided engine balance is reasonable. Beware of crankshaft torsional vibrations with six cylinder engines that have longish strokes. This can lead to crankshaft fatigue failure, and ring flutter problems causing blowby in the front cylinders.

I am sure Sydney Kid will be able to add to this list.

MEP is mean effective pressure. If you add up all the positive and negative pressures during the induction, compression, power, and exhaust strokes, you end up with a positive average pressure dominated by the power stroke.

This average pressure can be thought of as what pushes down on the piston and produces output torque from the engine. If you know MEP, bore, and stroke you can easily calculate flywheel output torque. It is a figure of merit for an engine.

There are two ways to gain more power, increase MEP or increase max power RPM.

The reason I was asking Peewee what MEP his supertuned engines run that easily break pistons. I wanted to know if he could give me a figure, for peak pressure, and average pressure (MEP). If he can so easily break pistons, I would not want him to tune my engine thats for sure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When you crank your car, and hit it with a timing light, can you see a steady crank timing?
    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
×
×
  • Create New...