Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Funny how those details that everyone loves are usually left out if the driver is in a Pulsar, or Camry, or Golf.

...and just like the media you only quoted what you wanted to, to make your point more relevent. What people want to hear.

He was in the wrong, he is 'one of us' so to speak. Hell he was VERY in the wrong. Maybe now we know this person is a skyline driver, maybe we should name and shame him??? Cause he aint going to stop driving in a hurry, and just continue to give 'us' a bad name.

Think of it from this point of view. Media, the point of it is to MAKE MONEY, not to do good, not to inform us of nice stuff, but to make money. Making money involves giving people a product they want or need. IE, hoons doing bad, people want to see that, so that makes money. Get it. We need to make good examples, shame the people who do bad. Its us that gives us our rep, and can make it worse or better. Having a whine about someones car getting named when they aren't legally allowed to drive for 6 years, then them driving off in said car... give it up dude.

End rant for now.

...and just like the media you only quoted what you wanted to, to make your point more relevent. What people want to hear.

He was in the wrong, he is 'one of us' so to speak.

1. I'm making an observation. When I see them mentioning Camrys and Commodores by name (which they do occasionally) I make a note of it too, usually in surprise.

2. I'm also not a journalist, so when I publish something I am not adhering to journalistic integrity. The article linked is not an opinion piece, at which I'd still be offended but by his opinion and not by his lack of consistency in reporting.

The driver is someone who's been repeatedly suspended for driving illegally, and continues to do so despite those suspensions. Whatever group he is a representative of, I'm not one of them.

I actually believe imports are less dangerous than Falcodores/Camry's etc. Performance doesnt just include the engine, it also includes brakes, suspension (to say the relevant least) and if you add that to normal law abiding driving your actually better off arent you.

Media spins always portray import drivers as speeders and as if we are always "on boost" and accelerating hard because the cars make a pssshhh noise.....Its sad that they will never have their facts right because telling everyone import drivers are bad people on the roads is much better for ratings.

Its like forum flaming, every opportunity you get to embarrass someone publically, you take it.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/north-...7545360994.html

It continues :laugh:

Up to three men lifted the ATM into a waiting white van, before driving off in the van and a white Nissan Skyline.

Up to three men lifted the ATM into a waiting white van, before driving off in the van and a white Nissan Skyline.

Yeah! Some of us are quite curious as to whether the van was a Mitsubishi Express or a Toyota Hiace. It might even have been a Mercedes-Benz Sprinter or Ford Transit!

Its those details that grab me, and make me want to buy newspapers.

I actually believe imports are less dangerous than Falcodores/Camry's etc. Performance doesnt just include the engine, it also includes brakes, suspension (to say the relevant least) and if you add that to normal law abiding driving your actually better off arent you.

agreed.

but the media are idiots... omg a skyline makes a sick psshhh noise he must be one o them street racer FnF type hoons :thumbsup:

sif the words nissan and skyline werent included in that article coz of the car it was. agreed with the others who have said that if it was just a random commo they would have said "to his car"

I agree that had he owned just about any other car it probably wouldn't have been mentioned. Skylines have a reputation for being the car of choice for many reckless young hoons. Therefore the writer obviously though it worthwhile to include the type of car in his article. Which only adds to their bad reputation.

Strangley enough though, I noticed this photo in the Daily Telegraph the other day. Found it interesting that just about all the cars in the photo are Commodores, and the one high-performance Japanese car in the photo was incorrectly said to be a Commodore. :D

post-19138-1147962383.jpg

HAHAH! Poor silvia. Just out of curiosity, what happens to cars when they get impounded? Do you have to get them back after a certain time?

its also an S14... which is a domestically sold model and not an import if you want to be technical :D

whoever owns it deserves to have it confiscated anyways for mounting gauges on the outside of the car.

HAHAH! Poor silvia. Just out of curiosity, what happens to cars when they get impounded? Do you have to get them back after a certain time?

Usually keep them for 3 months in NSW. You have to pay the impound fees for the whole term. I guy I know got caught doing a burnout. Had to pay the fine for dangerous driving or something, also had to pay the towing fee from the Central Coast to the impound lot in Sydney, and then the 3 months worth of impound fees. He was a wanker who throughly deserved it though. :D

its also an S14... which is a domestically sold model and not an import if you want to be technical :D

Yeah, I know. But they are usually tarred with the same brush. And it definately isn't a Commodore, which was my main point. :wub:

Edited by shyster
its also an S14... which is a domestically sold model and not an import if you want to be technical :D

whoever owns it deserves to have it confiscated anyways for mounting gauges on the outside of the car.

Fulli sik Hektik Yo Gauges on bonnet! As if the interior gauges werent hard enought read! LOL

Usually keep them for 3 months in NSW. You have to pay the impound fees for the whole term. I guy I know got caught doing a burnout. Had to pay the fine for dangerous driving or something, also had to pay the towing fee from the Central Coast to the impound lot in Sydney, and then the 3 months worth of impound fees. He was a wanker who throughly deserved it though. :D

Yeah, I know. But they are usually tarred with the same brush. And it definately isn't a Commodore, which was my main point. :wub:

3 months!!! Thats a pretty long time dont you think? i also hear that if a car gets impounded a certain amount of times it then gets sold off?

LOL, S14 Commonwhore :unsure:

It also says they were all caught doing burnouts........

"Sorry officer my GTR is 4WD"

"Yeah, so"

"You can't really achieve these said burnouts with 4WD"

"Step out of the car please, sir"

"But I didn't...."

"YOU DON'T WANT TO CAUSE A SCENE NOW DO YOU, SIR?" (*policeman raises vioce)

Always register your car in joint names, or better still in a company name. That way they can’t impound the car for any period of time because legally it’s not “your car”. It belongs to someone other than the driver, so they can’t punish them for something that they didn’t do.

Yes, it has been tried in court, it stands up and has precedent. Car registered in joint names, father and son. Son gets busted for “doing wheelies”, BS charge BTW, car gets impounded. Father needs car to go to work. Police say “no it’s impounded for doing wheelies”. Father takes it to court and wins, gets car back the same day.

Pregnant wife joint owner was even better, got that car back in under 5 minutes in court. Police and RTA not impressed, most angry prosecutor.

This is one of those cases when time is not your friend, get the car back NOW.

:unsure: cheers :rofl:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/mother...8150178401.html

Someone runs over a mum and 2 kids.

They've impounded the car, so they know what it is, yet the make and model of the vehicle is somehow absent......

I have yet to receive a reply from the Sydney Morning Herald. They're probably in too much shock and horror that I was able to write out such a sensible and concise email that they couldnt reply :P

They probably thought that a skyline drivers vocabulary consisted mainly of 'fulli sik uleh's!' and 'wicked bruss!'

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...