Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was defected for (no shit) not having a rego sticker displayed because it was stolen when it was

Obviously not displaying a valid sticker is not in that category, but we live in a state where doing a few k's over the speed limit is regarded almost as a firing squad offence, so there can be no real 'surprise' in it for you......at the end of the day you should have known. You also do realise that you have the option to appeal in writing over the fine and if you have a reasonable excuse the fine might be waived ??

In any event you seem to want to have a bit each way on this. I've seen you and others post here regarding getting 'smoky old bombs, etc' off our roads, and this at is least one of the purposes of stings like this along with the other things I mentioned. AFAIC that's a good thing and always will be. Unfortunately, yes, some will also be pinged for minor offences, but that's the luck of the draw. You can't seriously be suggesting that they shouldn't have random inspections ??.....think of the alternative: annual inspections which might also include some sort of emissions inspection if the EPA have their way (it's under serious discussion according to my sources).

I repeat, if you knowingly go out in the roads with illegal mods and get pinged for it, go have a look in a mirror for someone to blame......

I also got defected for brake light not working at the same time.

Which side was the brake light on that wasn't working?

Passenger side, or drivers side?

My brother got fined years back for having a brake light out.

He went and got some law books from the local library, and managed to get himself off on a technicality.

The law said something to the effect of...

providing the brake light located directly in front of the person driving behind you is functional, there's no problem.

Meaning that if it was the brake light on the passenger side which is out, you can probably tell them to stick it.

It may be worth investigating if this loophole still exists.

I'd pass a yearly inspection with my GTSR no problem as it would be done legitimately.

The roadside ones are very much pick anything in a "try our luck" scenario. They dont care if its not a legit defect.

The sad thing is you can be defected for anything, even if it isnt defective.

You are just handed a defect. Its not skin off thier nose if you take it to court.

Thats the core problem. There is no accountability for the Police. Although it will never happen......

The officer (if the case is lost by the Police) should be made to pay a proportion of the court fees out of thier own pocket rather than the Tax Payer.

Its pretty dumb that even if i win a case, im still paying for it through tax

Then you'd see people legitimately defected, not for some rubbish and stupid reason, that doesnt even hold up in the eye of the court.

cops are ghey, and always will be ... have to live with that, surely there are some good ones out there, cant say ive encountered any of them, ehehe, but these defect stations are good, and yet bad in the whole sence.

Sure they will defect a car that is clearly illegal to drive on the roads, be it an old car or new car, or performance car.

But if you come in ur skyline, u will get the whole yard, whoa, handbrake clicks to many times, meh, this thing, what ever it is, is illegal etc ...

im sure they pick on different cars harder than others

if i was a 40 + driver getting pulled over in a relativly new commodore/falcon. Im sure they wouldnt check the handbrake n other little insignifigant things.

Btw, the handbrake is a real grey area, cops say 3 clicks, vicroads state as long as it secures the vehicle, ffs, my gf, took her brand new (at the time) 03 civic in to the dealer to tell them, my handbrake goes to high, and clicks to many times, they said, we leave them like that otherwise it just wears out the brake pads ...

yeah ...

I'd pass a yearly inspection with my GTSR no problem as it would be done legitimately.

The roadside ones are very much pick anything in a "try our luck" scenario. They dont care if its not a legit defect.

The sad thing is you can be defected for anything, even if it isnt defective.

You are just handed a defect. Its not skin off thier nose if you take it to court.

Thats the core problem. There is no accountability for the Police. Although it will never happen......

The officer (if the case is lost by the Police) should be made to pay a proportion of the court fees out of thier own pocket rather than the Tax Payer.

Its pretty dumb that even if i win a case, im still paying for it through tax

Then you'd see people legitimately defected, not for some rubbish and stupid reason, that doesnt even hold up in the eye of the court.

Yes a very good point u make. The same should apply to parking offices that get it wrong. There is just no incetive for the police to get it right in the first place.

Mayb start a petition to make police accountable for their mistakes. If u get enough pple to sign it as well as some influencial ppl, u never know.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...