Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Would you like to hear the story about the Jim Berry Clutch that wrote off a car???

Nah it wouldn't interest you anyway you have selective hearing :laugh:

if its benno's white 32 gtr, im pretty sure the flywheel cracked, nothing to do with the clutch itself u assclown, he even said it himself

Would you like to hear the story about the Jim Berry Clutch that wrote off a car???

Nah it wouldn't interest you anyway you have selective hearing :laugh:

Jim Berry does good, I was surprised something Australian made could hold my 600rwhp and 10.8 runs, in saying that I personally like my OS clutches better and will continue to only use OS

thats cause his heads so far up jim berry's arse that he cant hear anything else

hey, i have an awesome idea of what a killer engine combo would be!

built RB20 by JHH with power adding sand, 200% fueling by richo @ allstar & super grippy and long lasting twin plate from NPC

I know of 2 Jim Berrys...both fairly catastrophic too

got details? i'm keen to hear

if its benno's white 32 gtr, im pretty sure the flywheel cracked, nothing to do with the clutch itself u assclown, he even said it himself

So the ridiculous clamping pressure had nothing to do with it??? Also I believe the fly wheel was recommended

A decent kit wouldn't have that problem

And then the was the clutch plate that broke in half...but look the other way fast!

Jim Berry does good, I was surprised something Australian made could hold my 600rwhp and 10.8 runs, in saying that I personally like my OS clutches better and will continue to only use OS

Both places have proven performers...it is just fun to watch Shane put on his Jim Berry hat

So the ridiculous clamping pressure had nothing to do with it??? Also I believe the fly wheel was recommended

A decent kit wouldn't have that problem

And then the was the clutch plate that broke in half...but look the other way fast!

big clamping pressure and single plate vs multi plates and shithouse drivability, i know which i'd want. even though there are breakages like ben's, it woulda happened with any other clutch with a std flywheel, just the luck of the draw.

comon, the plate woulda snapped after the flywheel broke u douche :laugh:

Both places have proven performers...it is just fun to watch Shane put on his Jim Berry hat
i know i laugh everytime clutches are mentioned when shane is around

rofl, it's good for a laugh!

:laugh:

big clamping pressure and single plate vs multi plates and shithouse drivability, i know which i'd want. even though there are breakages like ben's, it woulda happened with any other clutch with a std flywheel, just the luck of the draw.

comon, the plate woulda snapped after the flywheel broke u douche :laugh:

I personally found driving multi plates through the city in peak hour for work easier then the single. Go figure?

big clamping pressure and single plate vs multi plates and shithouse drivability, i know which i'd want. even though there are breakages like ben's, it woulda happened with any other clutch with a std flywheel, just the luck of the draw.

comon, the plate woulda snapped after the flywheel broke u douche :laugh:

I am talking about a different car

Dave had a drive of my car and said it was one of the most livable clutches he has ever used....which lead to him ditching his Nismo tripple and getting one of these instead!

Jim Berry does good, I was surprised something Australian made could hold my 600rwhp and 10.8 runs, in saying that I personally like my OS clutches better and will continue to only use OS

In what pray tell?

In what pray tell?

An s13 with a built rb25 with two, yes two HKS turbos.

Go read #33 zoom for specs. Fastest S13 in Asutralian and NZ and that time. The power to weight said under 10.5, sold it so who knows. Car lives in WA now.

86809059quDBJp_ph.jpg

Especially with a light pedal...it might have been livable if it had some pedal feel

i hate light pedals, u cant feel what's going on!

had an excedy 5 puk brass in both the gtst and gtr (zomg when it did run!) and the pedal in the gtst was awesome, drove nice as if u were asleep and not paying attention itd stall, but in the gtr with the vacuum assist, it was light as a feather, and i just couldnt get it to work

An s13 with a built rb25 with two, yes two HKS turbos.

Go read #33 zoom for specs. Fastest S13 in Asutralian and NZ and that time. The power to weight said under 10.5, sold it so who knows. Car lives in WA now.

86809059quDBJp_ph.jpg

I remember that car! It had Tokyo toys stickers at one point yeah???

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...