Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Advancing the timing too much can cause problems - detonation. I would be taking the car back, and dont go too hard until you are sure this isnt happening. Having said that there can be alot of different causes of poor idle - but if this has only just occured after the tune - thats the first thing I would be cheching.

How much advance are you actually running.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11960-timing-advanced/#findComment-211716
Share on other sites

Originally posted by sLo-32

Just had a dyno tune on my car with the new plugs i got.

The timing was also advance and now the car idles ALL over the   place! The car randomly pops on idle...rev range is not consistant, goes up and down and even stalls sometimes :) Is this normal and can advancing the timing cause any damage?  

cheers

sLo :P

Advancing the timing will not effect the idle that much. If it was detonating at idle, you would hear it... Sounds more like you got an airleak, before you take it back, you could spend a few minutes checking all the clamps are tight as they would of dissconnected a few pipes getting at the plugs. Also, the plugs might not of been gapped properly which can cause an irratic idle and misfire. If theres nothing obvious, take it back....

But I doubt its to do with advancing the timing...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11960-timing-advanced/#findComment-212196
Share on other sites

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Unless it is very advanced then I doubt this would be the problem, but take it back if it happened after they tuned it, they may have forgotten to do something up properly.

See'ya:burnout:

what would be considered too much?

How is a figure generated for this?

Do variables like modifications affect the threshold for advancing the timing?

I am curious b/c I was considering advancing my timing to about 25 degrees TDC. I have basic mods like cooler, turbo back exhaust, and boost (~11 psi).

George

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11960-timing-advanced/#findComment-212219
Share on other sites

Yeah....i got about 30rwhp from the tune / plugs / advance.

everytime they advanced it a lil more i got a few more horses but they just stopped and that was the end of it.

Another thing....when they were dynoing it, there was a guy holding a steel rod which looked to be between the head and the block and was holding this to his ear as the other guy was revving the car...is this done to listen for detonation?

i forgot to ask :P

AND....sorry :D

How would i know if there is detonation. Is it audible etc... cheers

Cheers

sLo :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11960-timing-advanced/#findComment-212267
Share on other sites

Anymore that 20+ deg of advance you need to be careful. More advance can increase the chance of detonation. Advancement should always be done on the dyno, where you can listen for pinging properly. You can determine the amount of advance via a timing light.

I run 25deg of advance, but I have a full management system, which allows for it. Pinging is not always audible, so take car if advancing the timing.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11960-timing-advanced/#findComment-212296
Share on other sites

Booster,

If its done the same as a 33, you might find a wire thats looped out from the rest at the igniter module on the top rear of the engine.

hook on to this. thats no.1 ... some have said its not real accurate but my cheap-ass timing light hasnt had a prob hooking up from there at all.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11960-timing-advanced/#findComment-215104
Share on other sites

Stock timing is 15deg on a R33 GTS-t, and I assume it's the same for the R32. This is safe, but won't make as much horsepower as when it is advanced further.

If you dont have a loop to hook the timing light to, then remove the coil pack cover and do it straight off that.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11960-timing-advanced/#findComment-215455
Share on other sites

Well i took the car back and discovered that the timing was on 15 deg =/ which is standard. So the timing was retarded ( no pun intended :D ) originally....crap

they brought the timing back 3 deg...sayin that when you accelerate your timing goes up 3 deg?

is this correct?

cheers

sLo :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11960-timing-advanced/#findComment-215698
Share on other sites

I recently had my timing reset from the mid 20's. I had been having detonation problems in the past and on the dyno my fuel graph's were looking dangerously lean.

Since i did my dump pipe at the same time i cant exactly measure the difference its made returning it to stock, however the workshop did tell me they had trouble getting it to sit at 15 degree's. Apparently it was stalling and dying when they made only mild adjustments (maybe the aftermarket management didnt help). But its all ok now.

I think with australian fuel its probably most advisable to run around the standard mark unless your going to highly modify things. At least then when you do turn the boost up your less likley to get detonation.

Red17

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11960-timing-advanced/#findComment-219478
Share on other sites

Originally posted by GTS-t VSPEC

Stock timing is 15deg on a R33 GTS-t, and I assume it's the same for the R32. This is safe, but won't make as much horsepower as when it is advanced further.

If you dont have a loop to hook the timing light to, then remove the coil pack cover and do it straight off that.

See'ya:burnout:

the stock base timing for a 32 is 20 deg and they do have the loop to put the timing light on to but it is sometimes taped back to the loom, removing the tape dose not reveal anymore than the desired loop wire the others will remain in the main loom tape.

Regards DAMQIK

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11960-timing-advanced/#findComment-221246
Share on other sites

one thing ill add is that half the timing lights out there wont pickup low voltage pulses

It does measure a current pulse but at a certain voltage and most are based on using them on high tension leads rather than the lower voltage which is apparent at the timing loop :D

Keep it in mind if you receive a funny reading

happens alot

cheers

mac

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11960-timing-advanced/#findComment-221275
Share on other sites

I have a r33 gtst 94 model the best I can get with out pinging @14psi is 23 deg however 25 deg feels more powerful up high though it starts pinging @ 5500 or so rpm at that timing setting.

macka Ive tested to see if there is a difference between the pick up loop and plugging in the coil to an ign lead to the spark plug, and there is no difference (using a snapon programable timming light) my $25 supa cheap timing light also reads the same weather placed at the coil or the loop. I think getting the loop through the pickup properly has more bearing on the accurcy of the reading. I have also found simply sitting the pickup on top of the coil gives a good reading if not too close to the No 2 coil.

Reagrds Damqik

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11960-timing-advanced/#findComment-221398
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...