Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Lakeside Motor Racing Enthusiasts' sources confirm that at least three of the seven organisations invited by the Pine Rivers Shire Council to manage Lakeside International Raceway have declined to tender for the business. It is understood that those who decided not to submit business proposals were not strong supporters of amatuer motorsport.

"We know the organisations that have made submissions have taken it very seriously and conducted themselves in a professional manner. We can only hope the Council will see fit to reciprocate in kind and finally deliver a return for ratepayers", said LMRE president Ian Milton.

A 20 year lease has reportedly been offered by the Council in exchange for limited track days at the former Australian Grand Prix circuit. It is not yet known if other restrictions will be applied to motorsport operations.

The historic track has suffered vandalism and neglect since the Pine River Shire Council purchase in 2001. Applicants are anticipating a need to invest in the facility's infrastructure and are confident of cooperation from motorsport's governing bodies to re-license the track.

The deadline for submissions was Friday, 26 May and tenderers are expecting a decision as early as mid-July 2006.

Ian Milton stated, "I'm pleased to see efforts heading in the right direction, but I still harbour concerns that the tender process is but a cynical ploy by Council to satisfy their obligations under the heritage deal!"

Additionally, the PRSC has been busy over the past few weeks demolishing the old office and barn, along with old toilet blocks.

However, essential motorsport items such as the racing surface and guard rails are protected for another four years by the deal with the Queensland Heritage Council that resulted in the removal of the heritage listing.

More info available at www.lakesideraceway.com.

Scott

Publicity Officer

Lakeside Motor Racing Enthusiasts, Inc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/120670-lakeside-near-the-starting-line/
Share on other sites

The public dont like hoons on the streets, but they dont want race tracks around either cause of noise pollution or whatever their personal preference is regarding the matter. At least 75% of the qld police force is dedicated to making sure 'hoons' dont drive their cars on the roads, yet there are not enough tracks around so people can have their fun in a safe environment. Ive heard recently that Carnell raceway at Stanthorpe is now under attack from public cause of noise and whatever else is bugging the surrounding residents, last short circuit meeting had to be moved to Morgan Park because of it, and it maybe a possibility that there might not be anymore meets at Carnell.

I hope the council and parties involved all realise these things and do the right thing and allow the track to reopen even if it is for limited forms of motorsport, at least it will be a start.

Cant wait for the new track to open out at Kilcoy. Godbless the Historic Racers.

  • 1 month later...
The public dont like hoons on the streets, but they dont want race tracks around either cause of noise pollution or whatever their personal preference is regarding the matter. At least 75% of the qld police force is dedicated to making sure 'hoons' dont drive their cars on the roads, yet there are not enough tracks around so people can have their fun in a safe environment. Ive heard recently that Carnell raceway at Stanthorpe is now under attack from public cause of noise and whatever else is bugging the surrounding residents, last short circuit meeting had to be moved to Morgan Park because of it, and it maybe a possibility that there might not be anymore meets at Carnell.

I hope the council and parties involved all realise these things and do the right thing and allow the track to reopen even if it is for limited forms of motorsport, at least it will be a start.

Cant wait for the new track to open out at Kilcoy. Godbless the Historic Racers.

As reported elsewhere in this forum, the Kilcoy track is no more. The landowner has apparently pulled out of the deal, so the track isn't going ahead >_<

Edited by Simonster

i believe with the Kilcoy track that the car club that was organising it (was it the MG Historical car club or something) are still looking at going ahead with it, however, it may not be at the same location.

i'm all for seeing lakeside re-opened, however it is an insurance nightmare for whoever takes it over, due to the track having little to no run-off areas in places, and the track starting to degrade due to little to no use over the last 4 or 5 years.

i was actually out there a while back for a skidpan day, probably about a year or so after the complex had closed (there's a small skidpan at the back of the track) and even then, you could see that the place was starting to fall apart due to lack of upkeep on the council's behalf.

don't get me wrong, i want to see it opened up again, however i can see it being a case of it may reopen, then the first time someone has a bit of an intimate encounter with the armco, they'll shut the place down again.

RE the condition of the track surface at Lakeside, its pretty much as it was last time I went to a general practice day in the weeks before it closed. I walked around it last summer reminiscing...

Yeh i know about it...the landowner pulled out cause of advice she received from her legal half...lawyer told her it wasnt in her best financial interests as it wouldnt pay itself off quick enough or something...i think i posted it all up in the other thread about the kilcoy track.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...